Page 260 - v11i4
P. 260

International Journal of Bioprinting                         Deep learning-based 3D digital model of fetal heart













































            Figure 6. Variance analysis and significance test of clinical evaluation parameters (n = 3). (A) Histogram of the ratio of LDRV to LDLV. (B) Histogram of
            the ratio of TDLA to LDLV. (C) Histogram of the ratio of LDLA to LDLV. (D) Histogram of the ratio of TDRA to LDLV. (E) Histogram of the ratio of LDRA
            to LDLV. (F) Diagram of LDLV, LDRV, LDLA, TDLA, LDRA, and TDRA. Four parts are marked in the figure: the horizontal lines of the corresponding
            parts indicate the transverse diameters, while the vertical line indicates the long diameter. Abbreviations: LDLV: Long diameter of left ventricle; LDRV:
            Long diameter of right ventricle; TDLA: Transverse diameter of left atrium; LDLA: Long diameter of left atrium; TDRA: Transverse diameter of right
            atrium; LDRA: Long diameter of right atrium.




            availability of digital models and 3D printing has opened   to sonographers. It allows for the adjustment of relevant
            the  door  to visualized  prenatal  examinations,  offering   parameters to enhance segmentation accuracy, granting
            benefits such as personalized preoperative planning,   healthcare professionals more control over the process.
            surgical simulations, enhanced medical education,   Moreover, the application of deep learning in this context
            and improved doctor–patient communication. Despite   is not merely a computational convenience, but a necessary
            these advantages, 4D US scanning systems, viewable   enabler of clinical progress. The fetal heart is exceptionally
            only on 2D screens, are more commonly preferred by   small, with indistinct boundaries and low image contrast,
            hospitals due to the laborious and time-consuming   making manual segmentation challenging and prone to
            nature of traditional manual remodeling methods.  FRT,   variability. Traditional image processing tools are often
                                                     28
            however, can effectively address these limitations by semi-  insufficient to achieve reliable anatomical reconstruction
            automating image processing tasks, thereby facilitating   under these conditions. FRT’s integration of AI-driven
            fast reconstruction of fetal heart models that combine   detection and interactive thresholding directly addresses
            seamlessly with 3D printing technology. This enables   these challenges, demonstrating that AI can be purposefully
            a quicker, more visualized, and intelligent approach   designed to overcome domain-specific limitations, not
            to  prenatal  cardiac  examination.  Comparing FRT  to   just automate existing workflows. While the proposed
            end-to-end methods, our interactive semi-automatic   FRT framework does not directly optimize 3D printing
            algorithm offers greater flexibility and interpretability   parameters, such as print path, material composition, or


            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                       252                            doi: 10.36922/IJB025200192
   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265