Page 30 - v11i4
P. 30

International Journal of Bioprinting                             3D-printed scaffolds for osteochondral defect




            Generally, the knee joints of small animals are in a   Conflicts of interest
            highly flexed position, unlike in humans.  Additionally,   The authors declare no competing interests.
                                              196
            humans engage in a wider range of movements—such
            as walking, squatting, and stair climbing—that generate   Authors’ Contributions
            different mechanical stress patterns on the knee joint
            compared to animals. Therefore, while experimental   Conceptualization: Qi Wang, Wei Zhu
            success in small animal models is valuable, a gap remains   Writing-Original Draft: Qi Wang
            in clinical translation.                           Writing-Review & Editing: Qi Wang, Wei Zhu
                                                               Investigation: Qi Wang, Ruoying Wang
               In contrast, large animals such as pigs, goats, and horses   Resources and supervision: Xisheng Weng
            exhibit biomechanical features and joint sizes that are
            more similar to humans. 194,197  Validation in these models   Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
            can provide more clinically relevant data. Nevertheless,
            significant interspecies differences persist. For example,   Not applicable
            only the human knee achieves full extension, a feature not   Consent for Publication
            observed  in  common  large  animal  models.   Therefore,
                                                197
            clinical translation of osteochondral repair strategies   Not applicable
            requires careful adaptation to human physiological and
            biomechanical characteristics.                     Availability of Data
                                                               Not applicable
            6. Conclusion

            Osteochondral defects  remain  difficult  to  repair due   References
            to  the  complex  structure  and  specialized  function  of
            osteochondral tissue. Recent advances in 3D printing have   1.   Mahmoudian A, Lohmander LS, Mobasheri A, Englund M,
                                                                  Luyten FP. Early-stage symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee
            enabled the fabrication of hierarchical scaffolds that better   - time for action. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021;17(10):621-632.
            mimic native tissue and support zone-specific regeneration.      doi: 10.1038/s41584-021-00673-4
            This review has highlighted four key strategies—composite   2.   He B, Wu JP, Kirk TB, Carrino JA, Xiang C, Xu J. High-
            gradients,  microarchitectural  patterning,  biochemical   resolution measurements of the multilayer ultra-structure of
            gradient, and cellular heterogeneity—as essential     articular cartilage and their translational potential. Arthritis
            approaches to achieving functional hierarchical design.   Res Ther. 2014;16(2):205.
            Despite progress, challenges like degradation mismatch,      doi: 10.1186/ar4506
            poor interface integration, and inflammatory responses still   3.   Soderquist M, Barnes L. Osteochondral allograft
            limit clinical translation. Future research should prioritize   transplantation for articular humeral head defect from
            the development of stimuli-responsive biomaterials,   ballistic trauma. JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024;4(3):540-546.
            validation in large-animal models, and the integration of      doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.04.008
            multi-material bioprinting technologies to further advance   4.   GBD 2021 Osteoarthritis Collaborators. Global, regional,
            scaffold-based osteochondral repair.                  and national burden of osteoarthritis, 1990-2020 and
                                                                  projections to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global
            Acknowledgment                                        Burden  of  Disease  Study  2021.  Lancet  Rheumatol.
                                                                  2023;5(9):e508-e522.
            The graphical abstract was created using BioRender.com.     doi: 10.1016/s2665-9913(23)00163-7
            Funding                                            5.   Weng Q, Chen Q, Jiang T, et al. Global burden of early-onset
                                                                  osteoarthritis, 1990-2019: results from the Global Burden of
            This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation   Disease Study 2019. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024;83(7):915-925.
            of Beijing, China (Grant No. 7232119), the Beijing Natural      doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-225324
            Science Foundation (Grant No. L232006), Peking Union   6.   Abdulghani S, Morouço PG. Biofabrication for osteochondral
            Medical  College  Hospital  Talent  Cultivation  Program   tissue regeneration: bioink printability requirements.
            (Grant No. UHB11847), the National High Level Hospital   J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2019;30(2):20.
            Clinical Research Funding (No.  2022-PUMCH-C-036),      doi: 10.1007/s10856-019-6218-x
            and the National Natural Science Foundation Youth Fund   7.   Brophy RH, Fillingham YA. AAOS clinical practice
            (Grant No. 82102582).                                 guideline summary: management of osteoarthritis of the



            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                        22                            doi: 10.36922/IJB025120100
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35