Page 334 - v11i4
P. 334

International Journal of Bioprinting                               Nozzle geometry for enhanced cell viability




            Author contributions                                  doi: 10.3390/IJMS24076357
            Conceptualization:  Annachiara Scalzone, Piergiorgio   7.   Mazzocchi A, Soker S, Skardal A. 3D bioprinting for high-
               Gentile, Daniele Tammaro                           throughput screening: drug screening, disease modeling,
            Formal analysis: Lorenzo Lombardi                     and precision medicine  applications.  Appl Phys Rev.
            Investigation:  Lorenzo Lombardi, Annachiara Scalzone,      2019;6:1–12.
                                                                  doi: 10.1063/1.5056188
               Chiara Ausilio
            Methodology: All authors                           8.   Chen A, Wang W, Mao Z, et al.  Multimaterial 3D and
            Writing–original draft:  Lorenzo Lombardi, Annachiara   4D  bioprinting  of  heterogenous constructs  for  tissue
               Scalzone, Chiara Ausilio                           engineering. Adv Mater. 2024;36(34):2307686.
            Writing–review  &  editing:   Piergiorgio  Gentile,     doi: 10.1002/adma.202307686
               Daniele Tammaro                                 9.   You S, Xiang Y, Hwang HH, et al. High cell density and
                                                                  high-resolution 3D bioprinting for fabricating vascularized
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            tissues. Sci Adv. 2023;9(8):eade7923.
                                                                  doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade7923
            Not applicable.
                                                               10.  Scalzone A, Tonda-Turo C, Ferreira AM, Gentile P.
            Consent for publication                               3D-printed soft hydrogels for cell encapsulation. In: Azevedo
                                                                  HS, Mano JF, Borges J, eds.  Soft Matter for Biomedical
            Not applicable.                                       Applications.  Royal Society of Chemistry. London, UK;
                                                                  2021:594–625.
            Availability of data                                  doi: 10.1039/9781839161124-00594. Soft Matter Series.

            Data are available upon request via  lorenzo.lombardi@  11.  Levato R, Jungst T, Scheuring RG, Blunk T, Groll J, Malda
            unina.it and annachiara.scalzone@iit.it.              J. From shape to function: the next step in bioprinting. Adv
                                                                  Mater. 2020;32(12):1906423.
            References                                            doi: 10.1002/adma.201906423
                                                               12.  Ying G, Jiang N, Yu C, Zhang YS.  Three-dimensional
            1.   Jim´enez M, Romero  L, Dom´ınguez IA, Espinosa MdM,   bioprinting of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA).  Bio Des
               Dom´ınguez M.  Additive manufacturing technologies: an   Manuf. 2018;1:215–224.
               overview about 3D printing methods and future prospects.      doi: 10.1007/S42242-018-0028-8
               Complexity. 2019;2019:9656938.
               doi: 10.1155/2019/9656938                       13.  Pedde RD, Mirani B, Navaei A, et al. Emerging biofabrication
                                                                  strategies for engineering complex tissue constructs.  Adv
            2.   Gu BK, Choi DJ, Park SJ, Kim MS, Kang CM,  Kim   Mater. 2017;29(19):1606061.
               CH.  3-Dimensional bioprinting for tissue engineering      doi: 10.1002/adma.201606061
               applications. Biomater Res. 2016;20(1):1–8.
               doi: 10.1186/s40824-016-0058-2                  14.  Tian X, Li M, Chen X.  Bio-rapid-prototyping of tissue
                                                                  engineering scaffolds and the process-induced cell damage.
            3.   Jose RR, Rodriguez MJ, Dixon TA, Omenetto F, Kaplan   J Biomim Biomater Tissue Eng. 2013;17:1–23.
               DL.  Evolution of bioinks and additive manufacturing      doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/JBBTE.17.1
               technologies for 3D bio-printing.  ACS Biomater Sci Eng.
               2016;2(10):1662–1678.                           15.  Lucas L, Aravind A, Emma P, Christophe M, Edwin-Joffrey
               doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00088               C. Rheology, simulation and data analysis toward bioprinting
                                                                  cell viability awareness. Bioprinting. 2021;21:e00119.
            4.   Bertassoni LE, Bertassoni LE.  Bioprinting of complex      doi: 10.1016/J.BPRINT.2020.E00119
               multicellular organs with advanced functionality—
               recent progress and challenges ahead.  Adv Mater.  2022;   16.  Ning L, Betancourt N, Schreyer DJ, Chen X. Characterization
               34(3):2101321.                                     of cell damage and proliferative ability during and after
               doi: 10.1002/ADMA.202101321                        bioprinting. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2018;4(11):3906–3918.
                                                                  doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00714
            5.   Parihar A, Pandita V, Kumar A, et al. 3D printing:
               advancement in biogenerative engineering to combat   17.  Bae YB, Jang HK, Shin TH, et al. Microfluidic assessment
               shortage of organs and bioapplicable materials. Regen Eng   of mechanical cell damage by extensional stress. Lab Chip.
               Transl Med. 2021;8:173–199.                        2016;16(1):96–103.
               doi: 10.1007/S40883-021-00219-W                    doi: 10.1039/C5LC01006C
            6.   Lam EHY, Yu F, Zhu S, Wang Z.  3D bioprinting for   18.  Ning L, Chen X. A brief review of extrusion-based tissue
               next-generation  personalized medicine.  Int  J Mol  Sci.   scaffold bio-printing. Biotechnol J. 2017;12(8):1600671.
               2023;24(7):6357.                                   doi: 10.1002/BIOT.201600671


            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                       326                            doi: 10.36922/IJB025190182
   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339