Page 350 - v11i4
P. 350

International Journal of Bioprinting                                 GradGelMA 3D-bioprinted vascular skin




            a significant impact on the growth characteristics  of   a transitional layer, whereas the structure printed using the
            cells, such as cell-oriented growth and the degree of   FCP method showed a distinct boundary between layers
            differentiation and maturation. 46-48  HaCaT cell suspension   (Figure 6C). To quantify the interlayer bonding strength,
            was dropped onto the surface of 20% (w/v) GelMA samples   the samples were cultured in vitro for 96 h to simulate the
            with groove textures and smooth planar film, respectively.   skin substitute. Tensile testing results (Figure 6D) revealed
            On Day 1, HaCaT cells on the grooved samples exhibited   that the fracture strength at the bonding interface of
            a clear tendency to grow along the grooves, while cells on   FCP was 9.6 ± 1.4 kPa, while that of PCP was 18.4 ± 2.5
            the smooth planar membranes appeared scattered and   kPa. The PCP method effectively enhanced the bonding
            clustered. By Day 5, HaCaT cells on the grooved samples   strength between different layers, increasing it by 91.67%
            continued to grow along the grooves without forming a   compared with the FCP method. The reason may be that
            continuous layer. In contrast, cells on the smooth planar   the upper-layer ink in the PCP printing method can form
            membranes had largely converged into a continuous layer   an intertwined structure with the lower-layer ink, thus
            (Figure 6A).                                       improving the inter-layer bonding strength. Based on the
                                                               PCP process, a four-layer skin model was printed by mixing
               The multi-concentration layer fusion process is shown   pigments into inks of different concentrations (Figure 6E).
            in  Figure  6B.  The cross-sectional images show  that  the   The thickness of each layer can be controlled to vary, with
            bilayer structure printed using the PCP method exhibited   the thick layer exceeding 1 mm and the thin layer less than









































            Figure 7. Printed vascularized skin substitutes. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and Masson staining of the bilayered skin. The red dashed line indicates the
            dermo-epidermal junction, black arrows point to fibroblast nuclei in the dermis, and red arrows indicate collagen fibers. Scale bar: 200 µm, magnification:
            40×. (B) Laser confocal microscopy images of vascularization in a defined ZJU region within human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs)-laden
            gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA). (C) Exemplary confocal microscopy images of self-assembled microvascular networks forming “U” and “J” shapes. The “U”
            and “J” shapes were printed using 3% (w/v) GelMA containing HUVECs, while the surrounding area was printed using blank 5% GelMA. Scale bars: 10
            mm, 2 mm, 50 µm, and 100 µm; magnification: 100×. (D) Schematic diagram of the construction of vascularized dermal skin. Vascularized dermal models
            were constructed and subjected to immunofluorescence staining: green fluorescent protein for HUVECs, F-actin for HaCaT cells and human foreskin
            fibroblast (HFF) cells, and DAPI for nuclei of HUVECs, HaCaT cells, and HFF cells. The white dashed line indicates the boundary between the papillary
            and reticular layers. Scale bar: 30 and 100 µm.


            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                       342                            doi: 10.36922/IJB025090069
   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355