Page 403 - v11i4
P. 403

International Journal of Bioprinting                               Bioprinted liver dECM/GelMA tumor model




            solution for 14 h, followed by treatment with a DNase   For morphology characterization, the bioinks with
            solution  of  100  U/mL  for  6  h,  and  washed  with sterile   different ratios were cross-linked using ultraviolet (UV)
            PBS for 3 days, with 5 mg ciprofloxacin added to prevent   light and subsequently immersed in PBS for 12 h to reach
            bacterial contamination. The resulting decellularized   swelling equilibrium. After freeze-drying, the samples
            liver matrix (DLM) was collected, washed with sterile   were fractured at the midpoint and coated with gold for
            PBS,  freeze-dried,  and  stored  at  –20°C  overnight.  After   60 s using a conductive gel to secure them onto the holder.
            72 h of freeze-drying, the DLM was then digested in a   The fracture surface morphology of the hydrogels was
            solution of hydrochloric acid and pepsin. The digestion   then observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
            process took place at 37°C and 250 rpm for 6 h. The   Additionally, the internal pore sizes of the hydrogels were
            pepsin concentration was maintained at 1 mg/mL, with   quantitatively analyzed using the Nano Measure software.
            a hydrochloric acid concentration of 0.1 M and a ratio of   For rheological measurements, all tests were conducted
            1:10 between the weight of DLM and the amount of pepsin   using  a  rotational  parallel  plate  rheometer  (MCR  302,
            used. After digestion, the pH was adjusted to neutral using a   Anton Paar, Austria). A volume of 5 mL of each bioink was
            sodium hydroxide solution. The digested mixture was then   pipetted onto the bottom plate of the stage, with the gap
            subjected to dialysis with a 1000 D cutoff membrane for 3   distance set to 1 mm. Shear rate sweeps were conducted in
            days, with water replenished every 4 h. Finally, the dialyzed   the range of 0.1–800 s  at room temperature. Temperature–
                                                                                –1
            dECM was collected and freeze-dried for further use.  viscosity measurements were performed from 40 to 15°C.
               Both native liver tissues and DLM were immersed in a   The storage modulus (G’) and loss modulus (G’’) of the
            4% paraformaldehyde solution for 24 h to fix the tissues.   bioinks were evaluated by changing the temperature from
            Following fixation, the tissues were embedded in the   40 to 5°C, with a cooling rate of 5°C/min.
            paraffin. Paraffined sections were cut into thin slices of 5   2.4. Three-dimensional printing
            μm for deparaffinization and rehydration. Cell component   To bring the bioink to a pre-gel state, it was placed at 4°C
            residues  were  then  observed  by  hematoxylin  and  eosin   for 20 min. Subsequently, the bioink cartridges were loaded
            staining. In addition, 5-μm-thick sections of native and   into a 3D bioprinter, with the nozzle temperature set to
            decellularized liver tissues were stained using the nuclear   25°C and the print platform maintained at 4°C. During
            stain, 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. The staining process   the printing process, the extrusion pressure was set to 0.25
            was performed at room temperature for 5 min. Collagen   MPa and the fill spacing was 1.2 mm. A porous scaffold
            I and III were also observed by immunohistochemical   with dimensions of 20 mm × 20 mm × 3 mm (length ×
            staining of tissue collagen.                       width × height) was printed. After extrusion, the printed

               For DNA, protein, collagen, GAG content, and    porous scaffold was exposed to UV light at an intensity of
                                                                        2
            proteomic analysis of dECM, a Tissue DNA extraction   30 mW/cm  for 30 s to induce cross-linking. To evaluate
            kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was used to determine DNA   the printability of the bioink and the print resolution of
            content, a hydroxyproline assay kit (Aladdin Biotechnology   the porous scaffold, the scaffold’s surface morphology was
                                                                                               44
            Co., China) was employed to measure collagen content,   analyzed using SEM, and the Pr value  was calculated.
            and a GAG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit    This value was determined based on the circularity of an
            (Sinopharm  Chemical  Reagent  Co., China) was  used   enclosed area, as shown in Equation (I):
            to assess GAG content as an indicator of residual cells
            in dECM. A microplate reader (Thermo Scientific™                c = 4ΠA/L^2                    (I)
            Multiskan™ GO, USA) was used to quantify the DNA,
            GAG, and collagen content.                            where c is circularity, L is the perimeter, and A is the
                                                               area. A perfect circle yields a value of 1. For square shapes,
            2.3. Preparation of three-dimensional printing     the maximum circularity value is π/4. Therefore, the
            bioinks and characterization                       Pr parameter for square shapes can be calculated using
            Five different printing bioinks were prepared with varying   Equation (II):
            compositions and ratios as follows: (i) 10% (w/v) GelMA
            (GM); (ii) 10% (w/v) GelMA and 5% (w/v) gelatin (GM/G);
                                                                                      2
            and (iii–v) GM/G combined with dECM at concentrations          Pr = Π / 4C L  / 16A            (II)
            of 1%, 3%, and 5% (w/v), labeled as GM/G/d-1, GM/
            G/d-3,  and  GM/G/d-5,  respectively.  The  components   To measure the swelling ability of scaffolds, the freeze-
            were dissolved in a PBS solution containing 0.25% (w/v)   dried scaffolds were first weighed and recorded as  Wd.
            lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate.  The  scaffolds  were  then  immersed  in  PBS  (pH  7.4)  at

            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                       395                            doi: 10.36922/IJB025160142
   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408