Page 27 - IJOCTA-15-1
P. 27

Significance of stochastic programming in addressing production planning under uncertain demand...

                                       Table 3. Monte Carlo Simulation N=10, m=10
             Cluster No      Product       Product       Product      Value of        Test      Gap
                                 1             2            3        Objective      result in
                                                                      Function       large
                                                                         (z)        sample
                                                                                      (Z)
                   1        22.986       31.976        20.897        -5.049.434   -5.019.969    -29.465
                   2        22.112       34.344        21.575        -4.888.018   -5.020.088    132.070
                   3        21.734       35.576        21.868        -5.009.936   -5.020.124    10.189
                   4        23.298       32.411        20.655        -5.018.321   -5.019.987    1.666
                   5        22.166       30.828        21.533        -4.849.015   -5.019.920    170.904
                   6        23.127       31.020        20.787        -4.941.427   -5.019.922    78.495
                   7        22.201       36.355        21.506        -5.194.353   -5.020.120    -174.232
                   8        23.236       30.391        20.703        -4.939.808   -5.019.891    80.083
                   9        23.500       34.633        20.498        -4.934.362   -5.020.092    85.730
                  10        21.322       31.052        22.188        -4.947.533   -5.019.921    72.388



            gap value was observed to be Cluster 4, which is recom-  decision support mechanisms.
            mended as the solution to apply.
                                                              When planning production under various uncertainty cri-
            Table 3 points up that the decision variable values for  teria, managers should ensure that their decisions are
            Cluster 4 are close to the average of the objective function  supportive for the subsequent period. A stochastic ap-
            values obtained from the large sample test, and it provides  proach to production planning problems can make uncer-
            the best gap value. Although the minimization problem  tainty manageable for them, allowing for linear operations
            allows for accepting the smallest objective function value,  aligned with their goals. This approach supports cost min-
            this study focused on the gap value. Therefore, the best  imization and provides valuable data for various aspects
            solution cluster has been determined as Cluster 4 among  such as inventory management, workforce planning, and
            the clusters with 10 scenarios.                   raw material consumption.

            4. Conclusion                                     This study provides a comprehensive overview of the sto-
                                                              chastic modeling approach used to determine production
            Achieving and maintaining stable production conditions is  quantities for a company manufacturing natural gas pipes.
            quite challenging in today’s world. Furthermore, numerous  The company can optimize its production plans under
            social, economic, and societal factors can influence com-  demand uncertainty for a 6-month period by evaluating
            panies’ production plans. It should be acknowledged that  various scenarios and calculating optimal solutions based
            uncertainty is a significant part of our lives and should be  on production parameters affected by this uncertainty.
            incorporated into our systems. Indeed, this study demon-  Notably, stochastic modeling tools such as the SAA al-
            strates that incorporating randomness and uncertainty  gorithm play a crucial role in managing uncertainty by
            into production planning can yield positive differences for  sampling existing data and have successfully managed this
            companies. Using standard linear programming, optimiza-  uncertainty. However, the assumptions and limitations of
            tion problems are solved based on the data set available at  the model may not always hold in real-world conditions;
            any given time t. This can result in a production plan with  for example, demand uncertainty could be more complex,
            z min = −4.696.619, assuming consistent production quan-  or external factors in the company’s production processes
            tities over six months, which could cause significant issues  may not have been adequately considered. The limitation
            such as sales losses or high inventory costs in real-world  of using annual sales data for the model may affect its
            serial production.  In contrast, by adopting a stochas-  performance in different industries or with larger datasets.
            tic modeling approach, which considers different demand  Additionally, the limited number of scenarios used in the
            quantities for different months, the production system is  study may prevent the complete optimization of deci-
            simulated with its constraints and parameters. This al-  sion variables. Future research could explore the model’s
            lows for determining optimal production quantities and  performance with larger datasets and across various indus-
            calculating the minimum cost at an optimal point. It has  tries, assess the effectiveness of stochastic modeling with
            been observed that the stochastic model provides a more  real-time data, and compare different optimization meth-
            advantageous solution.                            ods.In such problems, where stochastic parameters must
                                                              be handled, chance constraint-based models may be cre-
            The minimum value of the objective function obtained  ated instead of SAA. However, the disadvantage of chance
            from the stochastic model is z min = −5.259.730. Com-  constraint is that based on considered probability distri-
            pared to the deterministic model result, this represents a  bution, a nonlinear model has to be created and dealt
            significant difference. The stochastic model offers a more  with. Another option is simulation, which has its own
            flexible, efficient, and profitable decision. Managers can or-  disadvantages, such as difficulty in developing the model,
            ganize their production plans to control random demands.  long processing time, and not guaranteeing the optimal
            The stochastic model can be revised based on various goals  solution. Such studies could expand the model’s applica-
            and used as an important data source in the company’s  tion area and provide more comprehensive performance
                                                            21
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32