Page 45 - IJOCTA-15-2
P. 45

M. M. Parsa, K. Sayevand, H. Jafari, I. Masti / IJOCTA, Vol.15, No.2, pp.225-244 (2025)

                           β = 0.4                          β = 0.5                          β = 0.6
                1                                1                                1
                0.8                              0.8                             0.8
               v(s,τ) 0.6                       v(s,τ) 0.6 0.4                   v(s,τ) 0.6
                                                                                 0.4
                0.4
                0.2                              0.2                             0.2
                0                                0                                0
                1                                1                                1
                                        1                                1                               1
                                     0.8                              0.8                              0.8
                     0.5           0.6               0.5            0.6               0.5           0.6
                                0.4                              0.4                              0.4
                              0.2                              0.2                             0.2
                      τ   0  0  s                      τ   0  0  s                     τ   0  0  s
                                                            β = 0.7
                                                 1
                                                 0.8
                                                v(s,τ) 0.6 0.4
                                                 0.2
                                                 0
                                                 1
                                                                         1
                                                                      0.8
                                                     0.5            0.6
                                                                 0.4
                                                               0.2
                                                       τ   0  0  s
                  Figure 5. The approximate solutions of Example 3 for β = (0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7) and M x = N t = 100
                 Table 6. The numerical results of the L 1 errors for Example 3 with different values of β and (s, τ)

                                            Present method        Method presented in 39
                                  (s, τ)        β = 0.4                  β = 0.4
                                 (0.1,0.1)    2.84 × 10 −4             1.36 × 10 −2
                                 (0.3,0.3)    3.59 × 10 −4             2.97 × 10 −2
                                 (0.5,0.5)    1.75 × 10 −3             1.38 × 10 −3
                                 (0.7,0.7)    4.56 × 10 −4             1.60 × 10 −2
                                 (0.9,0.9)    9.72 × 10 −4             5.17 × 10 −3
                                            Present method        Method presented in 39
                                  (s, τ)        β = 0.6                  β = 0.6
                                 (0.1,0.1)    6.21 × 10 −5             5.77 × 10 −3
                                 (0.3,0.3)    3.86 × 10 −6             1.76 × 10 −2
                                 (0.5,0.5)    5.46 × 10 −5             5.56 × 10 −3
                                 (0.7,0.7)    4.63 × 10 −5             4.89 × 10 −3
                                 (0.9,0.9)    2.36 × 10 −6             1.86 × 10 −3
                                            Present method        Method presented in 39
                                  (s, τ)        β = 0.8                  β = 0.8
                                 (0.1,0.1)    5.51 × 10 −6             2.12 × 10 −3
                                 (0.3,0.3)    7.63 × 10 −6             9.53 × 10 −3
                                 (0.5,0.5)    7.16 × 10 −7             7.46 × 10 −3
                                 (0.7,0.7)    3.64 × 10 −6             1.44 × 10 −3
                                 (0.9,0.9)    6.43 × 10 −7             9.65 × 10 −3

            problem is transformed into a system of linear    structure for stochastic processes, fractional cal-
            algebraic equations. To validate the approach,    culus, and fractional partial differential equations
            several test problems are presented. The com-     have been introduced into stochastic models in fi-
            parison of the final tables clearly shows that the  nancial theory. Hence, the beginning of the 20th
            proposed method using Caputo’s fractional deriv-  century witnessed the use of stochastic processes
            ative is more accurate than ψ-Hilfer’s fractional  to model the financial market. By studying the
            derivative.                                       price behavior of assets, a model was presented
                                                              which is known as the B-S model.
            6. Conclusion                                         The Black-Scholes (B-S) model was intro-
                                                              duced to study the price behavior of assets. How-
             In recent years, not only mathematicians but also  ever, real financial markets exhibit inherent non-
            financial engineers have paid a great deal of atten-  linearity and memory effects, which can be more
            tion to pricing options. With the advent of fractal  accurately captured using fractional derivatives
                                                           240
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50