Page 51 - IJOCTA-15-3
P. 51

Modeling and analysis of the dynamics of an excessive gambling problem with modified fractional operator
            Funding                                            8. Kong Y, Li T, Wang Y. (2021). Dynamics analysis
                                                                  of an online gambling spreading model on scale-
            None.
                                                                  free networks. Adv Differ Equ. 2021; 11(2021).
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03165-z
            Conflict of interest                               9. Shaffer HJ, Korn DA. Gambling and re-
                                                                  lated mental disorders: a public health anal-
            The authors declare they have no competing in-        ysis. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:171-212.
            terests.                                              https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.
                                                                  100901.140532
            Author contributions                              10. Young SL, Tae SD. A mathematical modeling
                                                                  approach to gambling among older adults. Appl
            Conceptualization:   Mulualem Aychluh, D.L.           Math Comput. 2013;221:403-410.
            Suthar                                                https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2013.05.075
            Formal analysis: S.D. Purohit                     11. Weiwei L, Grace PL, Asha G, et al. Impulsivity
            Investigation: Clemente Cesarano                      trajectories and gambling in adolescence among
                                                                  urban male youth. Addiction. 2013;108(4):780-
            Methodology: D.L. Suthar
                                                                  788. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12049
            Writing-original draft: Mulualem Aychluh, D.L.
                                                              12. Brevers D, Cleeremans A, Tibboel H, et al. Re-
            Suthar
                                                                  duced attentional blink for gambling-related stim-
            Writing-review & editing: Clemente Cesarano,
                                                                  uli in problem gamblers. J Behav Ther Exp Psy-
            S.D. Purohit
                                                                  chiatry. 2011;42(3):265–269.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.01.005
            Availability of data                              13. Brown SL, Rodda S, Phillips JG. Differences be-
                                                                  tween problem and nonproblem gamblers in sub-
            Not applicable.                                       jective arousal and affective valence amongst elec-
                                                                  tronic gaming machine players. Addict Behav.
            AI tools statement                                    2004;29(9):1863–1867.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.03.030
            All authors confirm that no AI tools were used in  14. Gupta R, Derevensky J, Marget N. Coping
            the preparation of this manuscript.                   strategies employed by adolescents with gam-
                                                                  bling problems. Child Adolesc Ment Health.
                                                                  2004;9(3): 115–120.
            References
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-
              1. Reith G. The Age of Chance: Gambling and         3588.2004.00092.x
                Western Culture. New York: Routledge; 1999.   15. Michalczuk R, Bowden-Jones H, Verdejo-Garc´ıa
              2. Peter F, Nigel ET. The History of Problem Gam-   A, Clark L. Impulsivity and cognitive distortions
                bling. Springer: New York Heidelberg Dordrecht    in pathological gamblers attending the UK Na-
                London; 2013                                      tional Problem Gambling Clinic: a preliminary
                http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6699-4          report. Psychol Med. 2011;41(12):2625–2635.
              3. Skitch SA, Hodgins DC. (2004). Impulsivity,      https://doi.org/10.1017/s003329171100095x
                compulsivity and pathological gambling: an ex-  16. Sharpe L. A reformulated cognitive-behavioral
                ploratory study of pathological gambling as an    model of problem gambling: a biopsychosocial
                impulsivity-compulsivity spectrum disorder. Int   perspective. Clin Psychol Rev. 2002;22(1):1–25.
                Gambl Stud. 2004;4(2):175–88.                     doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(00)00087-8
              4. Zendle D, Meyer R, Over, H. (2019). Adoles-  17. C˘at˘alin B. Understanding Your Game: A Math-
                cents and loot boxes: links with problem gam-     ematician’s Advice for Rational and Safe Gam-
                bling and motivations for purchase. R Soc Open    bling. PhilScience Press; 2022. ISBN 978-606-
                Sci. 2019;6(6):190049.                            9735-00-8
                http://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190049            18. Aychluh M, Suthar DL, Purohit SD. Analysis of
              5. American Psychiatric Association [APA]. Diag-    the nonlinear Fitzhugh-Nagumo equation and its
                nostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders  derivative based on the Rabotnov fractional ex-
                (4th ed., text revision (DSM-IV-TR)). Washing-    ponential function. Partial Diff Equat Appl Math.
                ton, DC; 2000.                                    2024;11:100764.
              6. Room R, Turner NE, Ialomiteanu A. Community      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100764
                effects of the opening of the Niagara Casino: a  19. Ndolane S. Existence, uniqueness, and stability
                first report. Addiction. 1999;94:1449–1466.       analysis results for the SIR epidemic model with
                http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-                    a fractional operator. In: Mathematical Methods
                0443.1999.941014492.x                             in Medical and Biological Sciences; 2025:267-278.
              7. Do TS, Lee YS. A differential equation model for  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-44-328814-
                the dynamics of youth gambling. Osong Public      2.00020-5
                Health Res Perspect. 2014;5(4):233-241.
                                                           423
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56