Page 85 - IJPS-1-1
P. 85

Frank T. Denton and Byron G. Spencer

                                      bearing their own children; three generations later they will be of retirement and depen-
                                      dency age, and so it goes.
                                        There is also the question of how high to set the quota — how many immigrants to ad-
                                      mit in any period. It may be theoretically possible to effect a major shift in population age
                                      distribution by setting the quota very high but practical constraints are prohibitive. There
                                      are limits to  how many newcomers can be absorbed into the society without disruptive
                                      effects in  any one generation. The question  then  is how  much  beneficial effect on  the
                                      economy can be expected from a realistic quota, given the choice of immigration age dis-
                                      tribution. We experiment with alternative combinations of age distribution and quota size.

                                      2.4 Calibration and Notation

                                      A characteristic of the Alphan population is that it is the same at generation t = 0 as the
                                      2001 Canadian census population, and thus exhibits the same distorted age distribution
                                      and evidence of population aging (Statistics Canada, 2013b). Moreover: the age-sex-spe-
                                      cific survival rates incorporated into the Q matrix are identical to Canadian rates, and can
                                      be calculated directly from the 2001 Canadian life tables; the initial (total) fertility rate of
                                      1.6 children per woman is the Canadian rate in 2011; and the ratio of male to female births,
                                      set at 1.05, is approximately the longstanding Canadian ratio. (We emphasize that the use
                                      of Canadian demographic data for calibration is simply a matter of convenience. We take
                                      advantage of the fact that Canada provides a good example of a developed country with a
                                      “population aging problem”, but we are certainly not attempting to model the Canadian
                                      economy, population dynamics, or immigration patterns and policy. See the Appendix for
                                      details and references.)
                                        The age-sex  labour  force participation  rates  —  the proportions of (employed) labour
                                      force in the population, the elements of the vector r — are roughly consistent (in broad
                                      pattern) with Canadian rates in the decade centered on 2001, with the qualifications that
                                      the rates for Children are zero and the rates for Young Adults and Middle Aged are equal.
                                      The rates for females, the top half of  , are (0, 0.75, 0.75, 0.10, 0); the rates for males, the
                                      bottom half of r, are (0, 0.85, 0.85, 0.20, 0).
                                        Since output Z is proportional to labour input, and results are shown only as indexes,
                                      there is no need to set values for  ϕ   or the underlying β, γ, µ and θ parameters (Equation
                                      (4)). The rate of growth of productivity, g is set to zero in the initial simulations, but al-
                                      lowed to vary in some later ones.
                                        The simulations involve runs with different immigrant age distributions and some sim-
                                      ple notation is helpful in presenting  results.  First, note  that all simulations assume that
                                      immigrants in each age group are equally divided between males and females; we do not
                                      experiment with differences in sex composition. This cuts to five the number of values that
                                      would have to be reported in defining a distribution. Moreover, we assume in most cases
                                      (Table 1 is an exception) that immigration policy choices are restricted to Children, Young
                                      Adults, and the Middle Aged; no Seniors or Aged immigrants are permitted since immi-
                                      grants in those age groups would simply add to the numbers of dependents (aside from a
                                      small proportion of Seniors who enter the labour force). Our focus is on immigration as a
                                      policy device for influencing the economy, and offsetting the effects of domestic popula-
                                      tion aging. Permitting older immigrants to enter might be considered desirable for other
                                      reasons but its effect on immigration as an economic policy tool would be to weaken it. A
                                      practical result of this exclusion for presentation purposes is that the number needed to be
                                      reported in defining an immigration age distribution is now reduced to three. We choose
                                      the symbol AGEIM to stand for “age distribution of immigrants” and report the propor-
                                      tions in percentage form. AGEIM (25, 50, 25), for example, means that immigrants are

       International Journal of Population Studies | 2015, Volume 1, Issue 1                                    79
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90