Page 69 - ITPS-8-2
P. 69

INNOSC Theranostics and
            Pharmacological Sciences                                             Preclinical study of GBpoietin biosimilar



            the repeated-dose toxicity study, as shown in  Figure  4F.   4. Discussion
            However, the differences in BUN levels among the groups
            were not significant (P = 0.02).                   This study presents the overall results of the preclinical safety
                                                               evaluation of GBpoietin  in rats through a comparative
                                                                                  ®
            3.5. Necropsy findings                             acute toxicity study with Eprex , following subcutaneous
                                                                                        ®
            Single representative subjects from all Treatment, Placebo,   administration.  The  findings  demonstrated  that  the
                                                                                                  ®
                                                                                         ®
            and Control groups were euthanized for necropsy findings.   toxicological profiles of GBpoietin  and Eprex  were similar
            External surfaces, all orifices, cranial cavities, external   and aligned with the known pharmacology of EPO alfa,
            surfaces of the brain and spinal cord, thoracic, abdominal,   previously studied for a comprehensive safety and toxicity
                                                                                23
            and pelvic cavities, cervical tissues, and organs were observed   assessment of rhEPO.  No side effects or signs of toxicity
            for any abnormalities. However, no abnormal lesions were   were  observed  during  daily  observations  of  the  animals
                                                                                             ®
                                                                                    ®
            found during necropsy examination, as shown a Figure 5.  inoculated with GBpoietin  or Eprex  in the comparative
                                                               acute toxicity assay. There were no changes in fur or
            3.6. Histopathology study                          pigmentation, and the eyes and mucosal surfaces appeared
            No morphological signs of toxicity were observed in   normal, as did the somatomotor activity and behavior.
            internal organs such as the kidney, liver, lung, and spleen   Proper responses to stimulation were obtained, and no
            of  experimental  animals  from  the  single-  and  repeated-  deaths were reported during the study. Upon evaluation
            dose toxicity studies (Figure 6). No lesions of pathological   of the inoculation site, no signs of damage attributable to
            significance like degeneration or cellular necrosis were   the administration of rhEPO. 24-26  were evidenced. The only
            found on these internal organs in all treatment groups,   abnormalities detected were hemorrhagic areas observed in
            including the group that received Eprex .          the repeated-dose toxicity study, but these were attributed
                                           ®
            A





            B                                             G




            C                                             H






            D                                             I





            E                                             J






            F




            Figure 5. Representative necropsy findings of both single- and repeated-dose toxicity studies. (A) Control, (B) Placebo, (C) Treatment 1, (D) Treatment
            2, (E) Treatment 3, and (F) Treatment 4 groups of single-dose toxicity study. (G) Control, (H) Placebo, (I) Treatment 1, and (J) Treatment 2 groups of
            repeated dose toxicity study.


             Volume 8 Issue 2 (2025)                        63                               doi: 10.36922/itps.5797
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74