Page 111 - JCAU-7-3
P. 111

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                                          Seismic performance of reinforced SSPWs



            stress under load equals or exceeds the yield limit of the   3.4. Effect of the number of stiffeners on frame
            same material under simple tension. The equivalent stress   performance
            ( ) is calculated using Equation III:
                                                             The effect of the number of stiffeners on the performance
                                                   1           of the reinforced frame structure was evaluated using a set
                     σ − ) +(
                1        2          2         2   2        of 3-span, 5-story frames with circular stiffeners arranged
                                             σ
                                   σ
            σ =    ( 1  σ 2   σ − ) +(  σ − )    (III)
             e
                                    1
                                3
                                          2
                                              3
                 2                                       in a horizontal configuration.  Figure  17 presents the
                                                               schematics of the frame model mesh for systems with and
              where  σ ,  σ , and  σ  are the principal stresses.   without circular stiffeners.
                         2
                      1
                                 3
            The ANSYS software calculates the equivalent stress   To assess the impact of stiffener quantity, the
            using  Equation III and presents the output under   capacity curves and hysteresis loops of frames with 0,
            the abbreviation SEQV. According to this criterion,   2, 3, and 4 circular stiffeners were compared, as shown
            it is possible to identify the initiation of failure and   in  Figures  18  and 19. Initially, pushover analysis was
            determine the element from which the failure mechanism   conducted for all models, and their capacity diagrams were
            begins.  Figures  14-16 illustrate the von Mises stress   generated. By simplifying these curves into ideal bilinear
            representation of the 1-story frame models analyzed in   curves, key seismic parameters – such as stiffness, ductility
            the previous sections. Based on  Table  2, cross-shaped   factor, response modification factor, and shear capacity –
            reinforcements provide higher shear capacity than   were determined using ANSYS software. Subsequently,
            circular reinforcements, enhancing resistance against   the models were subjected to cyclic loading, and their
            elastic shear buckling of the infill plate.        energy absorption capacities were compared. Incremental
                        A                                    B
















            Figure 14. Finite element model mesh of a steel shear wall reinforced with cross stiffeners in (A) perpendicular and (B) horizontal configurations
            Source: Models by the authors.

                       A                                 B A

















            Figure 15. Finite element model mesh of a steel shear wall reinforced with circular stiffeners in (A) perpendicular and (B) horizontal configurations
            Source: Models by the authors.




            Volume 7 Issue 3 (2025)                         9                        https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.5781
   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116