Page 67 - JCTR-10-1
P. 67

Zhuang et al. | Journal of Clinical and Translational Research 2024; 10(1): 62-71   63
        1. Introduction                                         its role as a prognostic factor [18].  Elevated  levels  of  SIRT1
                                                                and VEGF are linked to unfavorable clinical characteristics and
          Retroperitoneal  soft-tissue  sarcoma  (RPS)  accounts  for   prognosis, suggesting SIRT1 as a potential therapeutic target [19].
        approximately  15%  of  all  soft-tissue  malignancies,  whereas   Finally,  modulation  of  FGFR  signaling  and  its  inhibitors  show
        myxoid/round cell  liposarcoma  (MLPS/RCLPS) represents less   promise  in  high-grade  liposarcoma  treatment,  which  highlights
        than 5% of all RPS [1-4]. MLPS/RCLPS is the most prevalent   the  potential  of  developing  targeted  therapies  [20].  Moreover,
        lipomatous  malignancy  in  children  and  adolescents  [5,6].  The   CXCR4 and AXL are emerging as promising therapeutic targets
        onset of MLPS/RCLPS occurs earlier than that of other subtypes   in the management of aggressive MLPS behavior.
        of liposarcoma and reaches its incidence peak in middle age.  Although it has been known for some time that the prognosis
          The  diagnosis  of  MLPS/RCLPS  is  definitive  due  to  its
        distinctive  morphology,  which  is  rarely  mistaken  for  other   of MLPS/RCLPS of different primary sites varies [21,22], there is
                                                                currently no prognostic study on MLPS/RCLPS of retroperitoneal
        monomorphic  soft  tissue  tumors  with  myxoid  stromal  and   origin  and  no  prognostic  tool.  Therefore,  we  analyzed  the
        lipomatous differentiation [7]. In addition, specific chromosomal   surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database, which
        translocations  were  identified,  including  FUS and  CHOP gene   provides  data  from  17  geographically  variable  cancer  registries
        fusions  [(t12;16)(q13;p11)]  and  EWS and  CHOP gene fusions   representing approximately 26% of the U.S. population [21,22],
        [(t12;22)(q13;q12)]  in  90%  of  tumors  in  >5%  of  tumors.  The   to investigate the DSS-related prognostic factors in MLPS and to
        detection of these translocations with polymerase chain reaction   attempt to develop a prognosis nomogram prediction model.
        (PCR) techniques enables pathologists to make precise diagnoses
        in  difficult  cases  [8,9].  RCLPS  refers  to  MLPS  with  round   2. Materials and Methods
        cells, accounting for more than 5% of all cases [7]. In terms of
        aggressiveness, RCLPS has a worse prognosis than MLPS [10].  Using  SEER*Stat  8.4.0.1,  patients  diagnosed  with  MLPS/
          MLPS/RCLPS is distinguished from other soft-tissue sarcomas   RCLPS between 2000 and 2019 were identified from the SEER
        by  a  number  of  characteristics.  First,  it  is  more  susceptible  to   database, in which all cases were reported from the United States.
        extrapulmonary metastases than other sarcomas [11,12]; second,   The following were the criteria for inclusion: (1) the International
        it is more sensitive to radiotherapy and chemotherapy than other   Classification  of  Diseases  (ICD)  code  O-3  morphology  8852
        liposarcomas  [13];  third,  the  prognosis  is  favorable,  with  the   or  8853;  (2)  the  primary  site  recodes  of  ICD-O-3  was  the
        5-year  disease-specific  survival  (DSS)  rate  for  local  diseases   retroperitoneum;  and  (3)  active  patient  monitoring  to  ensure  a
        exceeding 90% [13].                                     reliable patient status. The following were the criteria for exclusion:
          Several  crucial  prognostic  factors  impact  patient  survival,   (1)  patients  with  non-primary  tumor  and  (2)  patients  younger
        including both distant and local recurrence. Key factors include   than 18 years old. Myxoid/Round cell liposarcoma is diagnosed
        the  completeness  and  negative  margins  of  surgical  resection,   through  a  combination  of  histological,  immunohistochemical,
        histological  grade  reflecting  differentiation  in  myxoid/round   and genetic examinations. Pathologically, it is characterized by
        cell liposarcoma patients [14], patient age, and the role of tumor   abundant myxoid stroma and a round cell component, with varying
        biomarkers for treatment monitoring, prognosis assessment, early   degrees  of  lipogenic  differentiation.  Immunohistochemically,
        diagnosis, and treatment prediction.                    these tumors typically express S-100 protein, CDK4, and MDM2.
          Furthermore,  analysis  suggests  that  high  FGF-21  expression   A critical aspect of the diagnosis is the identification of hallmark
        improves  prognosis  [15].  Multivariate  analysis  considers   genetic alterations, particularly the FUS-CHOP or EWS-CHOP
        clinicopathological factors, such as tumor site, round cell (RC)   fusion genes, often detected through molecular tests like reverse-
        components,  high  MIB-1  labeling  index,  and  p53  missense   transcription PCR or fluorescence in situ hybridization.
        mutation  as  unfavorable  indicators.  In  cases  of  MLS/RCLS,   The  primary  endpoint  of  this  study  was  DSS.  We  collected
        reduced p14 protein expression and p53 mutations associate with   and analyzed data on gender, age, marital status, race, history of
        poor prognosis. In addition, the RC component is identified as a   previous  tumors,  the  interval  between  diagnosis  and  treatment,
        negative prognostic factor, potentially involving the p14ARF/p53   presence  of  metastatic  disease,  histologic  subtypes,  tumor
        pathway in its development [16].                        differentiation,  tumor  size,  and  treatment  methods  including
          Commonly mutated genes such as TP53, NF1, and PIK3CA are   radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery. Information regarding
        identified in STS through genome studies. PIK3CA mutations, more   the interval between diagnosis and treatment and tumor size was
        frequent in myxoid/round cell and pleomorphic tumors compared   missing  for  20  (11.7%)  and  21  (12.3%)  patients,  respectively.
        to well-differentiated/dedifferentiated tumors, suggest PIK3CA as   Given the rarity of retroperitoneal MLPS/RCLPS, we chose not to
        a  potential  driver  gene  and  therapeutic  target.  Survival  analysis   exclude these patients, instead substituting the missing values with
        reveals that patients with increased PIK3CA copy numbers have   their respective medians (1 month, 20 cm). All the aforementioned
        worse prognosis, highlighting its significance [17]. NY-ESO-1’s   variables  were  included  in  the  univariate  Cox  model  analysis.
        association with higher tumor grade and shorter survival establishes   Variables with P < 0.1 were further included in the multivariate
        it  as  a  valuable  prognostic  marker  for  myxoid  liposarcoma.  In   analysis. Variables with P < 0.05 in the Cox multivariate regression
        addition, PRAME’s high expression is correlated with unfavorable   model  were  selected  for  the  nomogram  prediction  model.  The
        prognosis and elevated levels in myxoid liposarcoma, indicating   accuracy of the nomogram was subsequently validated using the
                                                 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36922/jctr.00113
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72