Page 52 - JCTR-10-3
P. 52

226                       Das et al. | Journal of Clinical and Translational Research 2024; 10(3): 219-228
             Conference on  Appropriate  Technology for Birth,      doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001973
             Fortaleza, Brazil, 22-26 April 1985: Summary Report.  [25]  Polidano C, Zhu A, Bornstein JC. The Relation between
        [14]  Dumont A, De Bernis L, Bouvier-Olle MH, Bréart G,     Cesarean Birth and Child Cognitive Development. Sci
             MOMA Study Group. Caesarean  Section  rate  for        Rep 2017;7:11483.
             Maternal Indication in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic      doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10831-y
             Review. Lancet 2001;358:1328-33.                  [26]  Cardwell CR, Stene LC, Joner G, Cinek O, Svensson J,
             doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06414-5                     Goldacre MJ, et al. Caesarean Section is Associated with
        [15]  Althabe F, Sosa C, Belizán JM, Gibbons L, Jacquerioz F,   an Increased Risk of Childhood-Onset Type 1 Diabetes
             Bergel  E. Cesarean Section  Rates and Maternal  and   Mellitus:  A  Meta-Analysis  of Observational  Studies.
             Neonatal mortality in Low-, Medium-, and High-Income   Diabetologia 2008;51:726-35.
             Countries: An Ecological Study. Birth 2006;33:270-7.     doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-0941-z
             doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.2006.00118.x             [27]  Cho CE, Norman M. Cesarean Section and Development
        [16]  Betrán  AP, Merialdi  M, Lauer  JA, Bing-Shun  W,     of the Immune System in the Offspring. Am J Obstetr
             Thomas J, Van Look P, et al. Rates of Caesarean Section:   Gynecol 2013;208:249-54.
             Analysis of Global,  Regional  and National  Estimates.      doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.08.009
             Paediatr Perinatal Epidemiol 2007;21:98-113.      [28]  Thavagnanam  S, Fleming J, Bromley A, Shields MD,
             doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00786.x                  Cardwell  CR.  A  Meta‐Analysis  of  the  Association
        [17]  Lauer JA,  Betrán  AP, Merialdi  M,  Wojdyla D.       between Caesarean Section and Childhood Asthma. Clin
             Determinants of Caesarean Section Rates in Developed   Exp Allergy 2007;38:629-33.
             Countries:  Supply, Demand and Opportunities  for      doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02780.x
             Control. World Health Rep 2010; 29:1-22.          [29]  Li HT, Zhou  YB, Liu JM.  The Impact  of Cesarean
        [18]  Maine  D, Wardlaw  TM, Ward VM,  McCarthy  J,         Section  on  Offspring  Overweight  and  Obesity:
             Birnbaum A, Akalin MZ, et al. Guidelines for Monitoring   A  Systematic  Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Obes
             the Availability  and Use  of Obstetric Services. 2   ed.   (Lond) 2012;37:893-9.
                                                      nd
             United States: United  Nations Children’s Fund;
             1997.  Available  from: https://iihsdgn.weebly.com/     doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.195
             uploads/8/0/2/4/8024844/maternal_mortality_finalgui.  [30]  Taras H, Potts-Datema  W. Chronic  Health  Conditions
             pdf [Last accessed on 1997 Oct 12].                    and Student  Performance  at  School.  J  Sch Health
        [19]  World  Health  Organization  Human  Reproduction      2005;75:255-66.
             Programme.  WHO Statement  on Caesarean  Section       doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.tb06686.x
             Rates. Reprod Health Matters 2015;23:149-50.      [31]  Taras H, Potts-Datema  W. Obesity and Student
             doi: 10.1016/j.rhm.2015.07.007                         Performance at School. J Sch Health 2005;75:291-5.
        [20]  Ye J, Betrán AP, Vela MG, Souza JP, Zhang J. Searching      doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.00040.x
             for the Optimal Rate of Medically Necessary Cesarean   [32]  Rowe‐Murray  HJ,  Fisher  JR.  Baby  Friendly  Hospital
             Delivery. Birth 2014;41:237-44.                        Practices: Cesarean Section is a Persistent Barrier to
             doi: 10.1111/birt.12104                                Early Initiation of Breastfeeding. Birth 2002;29:124-31.
        [21]  United Nations Children’s Fund. The State of the World’s      doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2002.00172.x
             Children 2009: Maternal and Newborn Health. United   [33]  Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), Ghana Health Service
             States: UNICEF; 2009.                                  (GHS), and ICF International. Ghana Demographic and
        [22]  Berhan Y, Berhan A. Skilled Health Personnel Attended   Health Survey 2014. Rockville, MD, USA: GSS, GHS,
             Delivery as a Proxy Indicator for Maternal and Perinatal   and ICF International; 2015.
             Mortality:  A  Systematic  Review. Ethiop J Health Sci   [34]  Ghana Statistical  Service, Ghana. Results from the
             2014;24:69-80.                                         Demographic  and Health  Survey. Stud Fam Plan
             doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v24i0.7s                             2003;36:158-62.
        [23]  Black  M, Bhattacharya S, Philip  S, Norman  JE,   [35]  Khadem N, Khadivzadeh T. The Intelligence  Quotient
             McLernon DJ.  Planned Cesarean Delivery at  Term       of School Aged Children Delivered by Cesarean Section
             and  Adverse  Outcomes  in  Childhood  Health.  JAMA   and  Vaginal  Delivery. Iran  J Nurs Midwifery  Res
             2015;314:2271-9.                                       2010;15:135-40.
             doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.16176                      [36]  Tian  YT. China  is Not “The  World’s First Cesarean
        [24]  Black  M, Bhattacharya S, Philip  S, Norman  JE,      Section Rate”. Beijing: Guangming Daily; 2017.
             McLernon DJ. Planned Repeat Cesarean Section at Term   [37]  Nakamura-Pereira  M, Leal  MD, Esteves-Pereira  AP,
             and  Adverse Childhood Health Outcomes:  A  Record-    Domingues RM,  Torres JA,  Dias MA,  et al. Use of
             Linkage study. PLoS Med 2016;13:e1001973.              Robson Classification to Assess Cesarean Section Rate

                                              DOI: https://doi.org/10.36922/jctr.22.00239
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56