Page 50 - JCTR-10-3
P. 50

224                       Das et al. | Journal of Clinical and Translational Research 2024; 10(3): 219-228
        normal deliveries in the private sector are significant issues and   maternal,  neonatal,  and  infant  survival  by 9 – 16%, but  the
        challenges today. The present study investigated the different   different socioeconomic factors could be a varied association
        birth delivery  methods and their risks to child  growth and   between cesarean birth and mortality [57]. Betran et al. indicated
        mortality  in India using the current nationally  representative   that the risk of newborn mortality is higher when vaginal delivery
        data  from  NFHS-4  (2015  –  2016).  Our  findings  revealed   is performed by untrained medical staff (inexperienced or having
        disparities in different birth delivery methods across the various   inadequate skill), while planned cesarean delivery is the safest
        socioeconomic  and biodemographic characteristics  in India.   option for mothers and babies [56]. Our findings revealed that
        Women aged 25 – 29 years old were more likely to undergo   Indian women do not have adequate access to cesarean services,
        cesarean delivery compared to those aged 15 – 19 years old.   most likely due to insufficient provision of equipment, lack of
        Similarly, pregnant women of more than 24 months of a preceding   emergency room for obstetrics services, lack of skilled birth
        birth were more likely to opt for cesarean section compared to   attendants, untrained medical staff, major geographical barriers
        those of <24 months of a preceding birth. Newborns of higher   (e.g., long-distance), and lack of transportation [58,59].
        birth orders (>3) were less likely to be delivered through cesarean   Analysis of child  growth (i.e., stunting, wasting, and
        section than normal vaginal delivery. In addition, women who   underweight) based on different birth delivery methods displayed
        only want a single child are more likely to opt for a cesarean   a negative  association  between  cesarean  births and healthy
        section for their pregnancy than those who are expecting two   child growth, such as the influence on feeding practices [60].
        or more  childbirths.  This  was emphasized  in  earlier  studies   The study also revealed a higher prevalence of stunted, wasted,
        based on the women’s perceptions regarding the efficacy of the   and underweight child growth from cesarean births compared to
        cesarean procedure as a means to ensure newborn survival and   normal vaginal births. A prior study also suggested that cesarean
        to avert the risks of birth complications or stillbirth [49]. Women   births may have negative implications related to neuropsychiatric
        from urban residences were more likely to opt for cesarean section   disorders and mother-infant relationships  [5]. Another  study
        for childbirth compared to rural residences. This preference among   implied that schizophrenia and mental disorders were 10 times
        urban women could be associated with the easy accessibility and   higher  among  children  born through  cesarean  section  [61].
        availability of healthcare (public and private hospitals) facilities for   A growing number of studies reported that these children born
        maternal and child health services [49]. Women from the “richest”   through cesarean section had poorer sensory integration ability
        household’s preferred cesarean delivery compared to those from   than those born by natural  vaginal  birth  [62-65]. A  study by
        the “poorest” households. Household wealth and education are   Evans et al. reported a significantly faster transfer of breast milk
        attributed to the female autonomy to develop greater confidence   from mother to child in vaginal birth than in cesarean births
        and decision-making power regarding their health  [50,51]. An   in the first 5 days postpartum [66]. Similarly, Scott et al. also
        earlier study also suggested that educated women from the “richest”   found that delayed onset of lactation was significantly higher for
        households have access to higher quality services and health-care   cesarean births compared to normal vaginal births [67].
        facilities compared to other less-privileged women  [52]. Our   The logistic regression model examined significant predictors
        study also demonstrated that most childbirth in public hospitals   of neonatal and infant mortalities based on different birth delivery
        was delivered by normal vaginal delivery than cesarean delivery.   methods. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, we
        In general, in public hospitals, doctors prefer cesarean delivery,   identified that the mother’s age during delivery, preceding birth
        especially for complicated pregnancies, including abnormal labor   interval, birth order, place of residence, wealth index, and skilled
        pain and postpartum hemorrhage. In many high-  and middle-  birth attendants were significantly associated with the decisions
        income countries, cesarean births are more common than normal   on selecting cesarean or normal vaginal delivery methods. The
        births in private institutions [53,54]. An earlier study investigating   findings suggest that older mothers during delivery and longer
        the short- and long-term effects of cesarean section on women and   preceding birth intervals reduced the risk of neonatal and infant
        child health suggested that normal vaginal delivery reduced the   mortalities  from cesarean births. Furthermore, newborns  of
        length of hospital stay, financial cost, and the risk of hysterectomy   higher  birth  orders had  higher  risks of dying  from  cesarean
        for postpartum hemorrhage, while cesarean delivery reduced   delivery compared to normal vaginal delivery. Consistent with
        the risk of vaginal injury, abdominal and perineal pain during   previous studies, our findings indicated that women from the
        birth and 3 days postpartum, early postpartum hemorrhage, and   “richest”  wealth quintile  had lower risks of infant mortality
        obstetric shock [55].                                  than those from the “poorest” households [68,69]. The study
          Our study also analyzed the effect of different birth delivery   confirmed that poverty is the major factor responsible for the
        methods  on neonatal  and  infant  mortalities  and  revealed  that   reduced  odds of newborn mortality  from cesarean  births. In
        neonatal and infant mortality rates varied across socioeconomic   addition, the higher rate of cesarean deliveries is often attributed
        characteristics. Neonatal and infant mortality rates were lower   to higher costs of healthcare, which also impacts the economic
        for cesarean births in private institutions compared to public   burden of a household as measured by the wealth index.
        institutions. Moreover, cesarean delivery plays a dominant role   The major strength of this study is the utilization of nationally
        in the survival of newborns and prevents perinatal mortality and   representative data, which corresponds to a large sample size
        severe morbidity, such as intrapartum asphyxia [56]. Another   that evaluates normal and cesarean births in public and private
        systematic review validated the association between cesarean   institutions.  This study had several  limitations:  (i) the data
        birth and mortality and concluded that cesarean birth improves   lacked information relating to the clinical indications of cesarean

                                              DOI: https://doi.org/10.36922/jctr.22.00239
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55