Page 49 - JCTR-10-3
P. 49

Das et al. | Journal of Clinical and Translational Research 2024; 10(3): 219-228   223
        private  and public hospitals. Conversely, neonatal  mortalities   mothers aged 15 – 19 years old during delivery as the reference
        were 0.88 times lower in public hospitals compared to private   category, it was observed that mothers aged 25 – 29 years old
        hospitals for normal births. This could be due to the preferences   reported a lower risk of neonatal mortality from normal births
        of private  hospital  doctors to  perform  cesarean  sections  over   compared to cesarean births. Mothers, who gave birth more
        normal deliveries, thereby significantly increasing neonatal and   than 24 months after a preceding birth, reported significantly
        infant  mortalities of normal  births in private  hospitals.  With   lower risks of neonatal and infant mortalities compared to those
                                                               who gave birth less than 24 months after a preceding  birth.
                                                               Birth orders of more than the third births were at significantly
           45                 Cesarean delivery
                  40.2                                         higher risks of neonatal  and infant mortalities  (i.e., 1.23 and
           40                 Normal delivery  36.3            1.32  times,  respectively)  for cesarean  births compared  to
           35        27.1                                      normal births. Newborns from the “poorer” households were
           Percentage (%)  25    21  16.8         23.2         at a higher risk of neonatal and infant mortalities compared to
           30
                                                               newborns from the “richest” households for both normal and
           20
                                                               cesarean births. In addition, the risk of neonatal mortality was
           15
           10                                                  significantly lower for normal births delivered by doctors than
                                                               nurses (OR: 0.91 vs. 0.93).
            5
            0                                                  4. Discussion
                   Stunting      Wasting      Underweight
                               Child growth
                                                                 The  effect  of  cesarean  deliveries  on  child  health  and  the
        Figure 1. Impact of birth delivery method on child growth.  higher cost associated with cesarean deliveries  compared to

        Table 4. OR and 95% CI for neonatal and infant mortalities based on the delivery method according to different demographic and socioeconomic
        backgrounds in India (2015 – 2016)
        Background                                                Mortality, OR (95% CI)
                                                  Neonatal                                   Infant
                                        Cesarean             Normal               Cesarean             Normal
        Place of delivery
         Public                     0.24 (0.17 – 0.34)***  0.88 (0.81 – 0.96)***  0.28 (0.20 – 0.39)***  0.89 (0.83 – 0.95)***
         Private                    0.25 (0.17 – 0.35)***  1.33 (1.21 – 1.47)***  0.28 (0.20 – 0.39)***  1.20 (1.10 – 1.31)***
        Mother’s age (years)
         15 – 19 ®                         -                    -                    -                    -
         20 – 24                      0.83 (0.57 – 1.19)  0.77 (0.68 – 0.88)***  0.89 (0.63 – 1.25)  0.73 (0.65 – 0.82)***
         25 – 29                      0.78 (0.54 – 1.13)  0.64 (0.56 – 0.73)***  0.86 (0.61 – 1.21)  0.62 (0.56 – 0.70)***
         >30                          0.77 (0.52 – 1.13)  0.68 (0.60 – 0.79)***  0.86 (0.60 – 1.23)  0.68 (0.61 – 0.77)***
        Preceding birth interval (months)
         <24 ®                             -                    -                    -                    -
         ≥24                        0.74 (0.61 – 0.91)***  0.53 (0.50 – 0.57)***  0.77 (0.64 – 0.92) ***  0.53 (0.50 – 0.56)***
        Birth order
         1 ®                               -                    -                    -                    -
         2                          0.74 (0.63 – 0.88)***  0.58 (0.54 – 0.62)***  0.84 (0.72 – 0.96) **  0.61 (0.58 – 0.65)***
         >3                          1.23 (1.01 – 1.49)**  0.70 (0.65 – 0.76)***  1.32 (1.11 – 1.56) ***  0.80 (0.75 – 0.85)***
        Place of residence
         Urban ®                           -                    -                    -                    -
         Rural                        1.05 (0.90 – 1.22)  1.02 (0.95 – 1.10)   1.04 (0.91 – 1.18)   1.01 (0.94 – 1.07)
        Household wealth
         Poorest ®                         -                    -                    -                    -
         Poorer                      0.82 (0.66 – 1.02)*  0.84 (0.79 – 0.89)***  0.82 (0.67 – 1.00)*  0.86 (0.82 – 0.91)***
         Middle                     0.60 (0.48 – 0.74)***  0.68 (0.64 – 0.74)***  0.61 (0.50 – 0.74)***  0.73 (0.69 – 0.78)***
         Richer                     0.45 (0.36 – 0.57)***  0.57 (0.52 – 0.63)***  0.47 (0.38 – 0.57)***  0.62 (0.57 – 0.67)***
         Richest                    0.37 (0.29 – 0.47)***  0.40 (0.36 – 0.46)***  0.36 (0.29 – 0.44)***  0.44 (0.39 – 0.48)***
        Birth delivered by
         Doctor ®                    0.79 (0.66 – 0.94)**  0.91 (0.88 – 1.00)**  0.81 (0.70 – 0.95)***  0.89 (0.84 – 0.93)***
         Nurse                        0.99 (0.86 – 1.13)  0.93 (0.87 – 1.00)**  0.95 (0.85 – 1.07)  0.94 (0.89 – 0.99)**
        ® Denotes the reference category; ***P<0.01; **P<0.05; *P<0.10.
        Abbreviations: CI: Confidence interval; SD: Standard deviation.
                                              DOI: https://doi.org/10.36922/jctr.22.00239
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54