Page 14 - JCTR-10-4
P. 14

236                       Tyson et al. | Journal of Clinical and Translational Research 2024; 10(4): 229-236
             A  Measure  to  Determine  Acceptable  Workload  for   Level (OPAL). J Clin Res Bioeth 2017;8:4.
             Increasing  Operational  Efficiencies  for  the  Conduct      doi: 10.4172/2155-9627.1000308
             of  Clinical  Trials.  Doctor  of  Nursing  Practice  (DNP)   [26]  Tyson  KT,  Morgan-Billingslea  J,  Taylor  T,  Khizer  S,
             Manuscripts; 2020. Available from: https://dsc.duq.edu/  Parker  T,  Pemu  P. A  Single  Site  Study: Adapting  the
             dnp/1 [Last accessed on 2024 Aug 09].                  Ontario Protocol Assessment Level (OPAL). In: Poster
        [23]  Wu  K,  Wu  E,  D’Andrea  M,  Chitale  N,  Lim  M,    presented at: Southeast Regional Clinical & Translational
             Dabrowski  M,  et  al.  Machine  Learning  Prediction   Science Conference, Pine Mountain, GA; 2023.
             of  Clinical  Trial  Operational  Efficiency.  AAPS  J   [27]  James P, Bebee P, Beekman L, Browning D, Innes M,
             2022;24:57.                                            Kain J,  et al.  Effort  Tracking  Metrics  Provide  Data
             doi: 10.1208/s12248-022-00703-3                        for  Optimal  Budgeting  and  Workload  Management  in
        [24]  Baer  AR,  Zon  R,  Devine  S,  Lyss  AP.  The  Clinical   Therapeutic Cancer Clinical Trials. J Natl Compr Canc
             Research Team. J Oncol Pract 2011;7:188-92.            Netw 2011;9:1343-52.
             doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000276                           doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2011.0116
        [25]  Sarmento R, Silvino Z. Measuring Workload of Clinical   [28]  Burgess  LJ,  Sulzer  NU.  The  Growing  Disparity
             Trials:  Transcultural  Adaptation  and  Validation  to   between  Clinical  Trial  Complexity  and  Investigator
             Portuguese  Language  of  Ontario  Protocol Assessment   Compensation. Cardiovasc J Afr 2010;21:249-50.




















































                                                               Publisher’s note
                                                               AccScience  Publishing  remains  neutral  with  regard  to
                                                               jurisdictional  claims  in  published  maps  and  institutional
                                                               affiliations.

                                              DOI: https://doi.org/10.36922/jctr.24.00022
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19