Page 37 - JCTR-10-4
P. 37

Yoksa, et al. | Journal of Clinical and Translational Research 2024; 10(4): 256-262   259

        Table 2. Effects of burn wound treatment on leukocyte indices in albino rats   8 DPT (P < 0.05). However, at 21 DPT, there was a decrease
        treated with 1% silver sulphadiazine (SSD) or 5% resveratrol (RSV) topical   in serum AST activity in all treatment groups, relative to 5 and
        ointments or no treatment (NT)                         8 DPT (P > 0.05). Serum ALP activity was significantly elevated
        Parameter  Groups                Day                   in the 5% RSV group at 5 DPT but decreased gradually on 8 and
                   (n=5)        5          8         21        21 DPT (P < 0.05).

        WBC        Control   10.78±1.57 a  11.60±1.29 a  11.20±1.44 a  3.4. Effects of burn wound treatment on the serum
            3
        (× 10 /µL)   1% SSD  12.20±1.68 a  12.00±1.37 a  12.50±1.32 a  concentrations of creatinine and urea
                   5% RSV    10.00±2.18 a  8.90±1.08 a  10.40±1.64 a
                   NT        11.00±1.73 a  8.60±2.46 a  11.20±1.44 a  The serum concentrations of creatinine and urea following
        Neutrophils   Control  2262±136 ab  3355±557 a  2879±999 a  BW  treatment  are  summarized  in Table  4. A  decrease  in  the
        (N/µL)     1% SSD    3936±2086 a  3395±336 a  3274±1047 a  serum urea concentration was observed in the 5% RSV group
                   5% RSV    1556±620 b  1081±692 b  1688±507 b  at 5 DPT. At 8 DPT, the mean serum urea concentration was
                   NT        2980±1456 ab  2727±908 a  2789±559 a  lower  in  the  5%  RSV-treated  group  compared  to  the  1%
        Monocytes   Control   408±311 a  510±203 a  366±118 a  SSD group (P < 0.05). At 21 DPT, the concentration of urea
        (M/µL)     1% SSD     154±142 b  411±152 ab  322±246 a  was comparable in all  treated  and NT groups compared  to
                   5% RSV    232±168 ab  230±161 b  206±118 a  the  control  group (P  >  0.05).  Creatinine  concentration  was
                   NT         302±129 a  206±119 c  247±161 a  lower (P < 0.05) in the 5% RSV group at 5 DPT. At 8 DPT,
        Lymphocytes   Control  8218±665 a  7685±1049 a  7915±1615 a  all treatment groups and the NT group had a comparable mean
        (L/µL)     1% SSD    8110±1233 a  8194±1054 a  8852±1001 a  creatinine concentration (P > 0.05), which was higher than the
                   5% RSV    8212±1681 a  5696±3271 a  8506±1173 a  control group (P < 0.05), except for the 5% RSV group which
                                                               had a comparable concentration with the control group. At 21
                   NT        7718±1572 a  5624±1650 a  8164±975 a  DPT, there was no significant difference in the concentration
        Note: Superscripts ( ,  , and  ) define the significance of differences in the mean (for   of creatinine between all groups. Within all treatment groups,
                    a
                     b
                         c
        each parameter) between groups (row) for each day (column). The same superscript
        applied  down  a  column  indicates  non-significant  differences  (P>0.05),  while  a   mean creatinine concentrations declined gradually from 5–21
        different superscript in the same column indicates a significant difference (P<0.05).   DPT (P < 0.05).
        For instance, on day 8 (neutrophils), the means for the control, 1% SSD, and NT are
        not significantly different from each other (denoted by  ), and they are significantly   3.5. Effect of burn wound treatment on the serum
                                         a
        different from the mean of the 5% RSV group (denoted by  ). Abbreviation: WBC:
                                            b
        White blood cell.                                      concentration of VEGF
                                                                 The  concentrations  of  serum  VEGF  are  summarized  in
        Table 3. Effects of burn wound treatment on the serum activities of
        alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST),   Table 5 as the mean ± standard error. No significant difference
        and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in albino rats treated with 1% silver   was observed at 5 DPT in the treated groups (P > 0.05). At 8 and
        sulphadiazine (SSD) or 5% resveratrol (RSV) topical ointments or   21 DPT, a significant difference in VEGF concentration between
        no treatment (NT)                                      the 1%SSD and 5% RSV groups was observed (P < 0.05).
        Parameter Groups                Day
                 (n=5)       5           8          21          Table 4. Effects of burn wound treatment on the serum concentrations
        ALT (U/L) Control  72.40±9.50 a,x  72.00±8.51 a,x  73.60±4.39 a,x  of  urea  and  creatinine  in  albino  rats  treated  with  1%  silver
                 1% SSD   79.80±1.92 a,x  79.20±3.65 a,x  67.80±4.15 a,y  sulphadiazine (SSD) or 5% resveratrol (RSV) topical ointments or
                                                                no treatment (NT)
                 5% RSV  108.60±2.97 b,x  79.00±16.46 a,y  72.60±4.56 a,y
                 NT      107.20±6.06    77.40±3.85 a,y  67.80±5.54 a,y  Parameter Groups      Day
                                 b, x
                                                                        (n=5)
        AST (U/L) Control  100.40±8.26 a,x  86.40±14.72 a,x  90.80±44.63 a,x        5           8          21
                 1% SSD  115.20±1.92 bc,x  123.40±10.71 bc,x  110.40±2.19 a,y  Urea   Control  9.12±0.46 a,x  9.62±0.62 a,x  7.62±0.41 a,y
                 5% RSV  128.00±12.12 ac,x  129.40±24.30 c,x  110.20±1.10 a,x  (mmol/L)   1% SSD  9.08±0.91 a,x  11.94±1.19 b,y  6.12±1.31 b,z
                 NT      114.60±5.07 c,x  118.60±12.93 bc,y  105.80±4.92 a,x  5% RSV  7.00±0.38 b,x  10.42±1.51 a,y  6.82±0.73 ab,x
        ALP (U/L) Control  14.40±1.14 a,x  11.80±1.92 a,x  13.60±1.14 a,y  NT    8.16±1.15 a,x  11.26±0.97 bc,y  6.52±0.58 ab,z
                 1% SSD   18.00±1.87 b,x  13.80±2.17 ab,y  13.20±1.30 a,z  Creatinine  Control  179.60±6.77 a,x  200.20±9.68 a,y  134.40±9.86 a,z
                                                               (µmol/L)
                 5% RSV   20.80±0.83 c,x  16.60±3.65 b,y  14.00±1.22 a,y  1% SSD  202.20±14.41 ac,x  287.80±51.93 b,y  115.00±18.71 a,z
                 NT     15.80±1.30 a,x  14.60±2.07 ab,y  11.00±2.23 b,z  5% RSV  147.60±22.68 b,x  232.60±52.82 ab,y  118.20±12.30 a,x
                                                                        NT     220.60±33.56 c,x  271.00±37.36 b,x  149.80±51.07 a,y
                         c
        Note: Superscripts ( ,  , and  ) define the significance of differences in mean (for each
                    a b
                                                     z
                                                x y
        parameter) between groups (row) for each day (column); superscripts ( ,  , and  ) define   Note: Superscripts ( ,  , and  ) define the significance of differences in mean (for each
                                                                                c
                                                                           a b
        the  significance  of  differences  in  mean  (for  each  parameter)  between  days  (column)   parameter) between groups (row) for each day (column); superscripts ( ,  , and  ) define
                                                                                                            z
                                                                                                       x y
        for each group (row). The same superscript applied across a row (or down a column)   the significance of differences in mean between days (column) for each group (row).
        indicates non-significant differences (P>0.05), while a different superscript in the same   The same superscript applied across a row (or down a column) indicates non-significant
        row  (or  column)  indicates  a  significant  difference  (P<0.05).  For  instance,  on  day  5   differences (P>0.05), while a different superscript in the same row (or column) indicates
        (ALT), the means for the control and 1% SSD are not significantly different from each   a significant difference (P<0.05). For instance, on day 5 (urea), the means for control, 1%
        other (denoted by  ), but they are significantly different from the means of the 5% RSV   SSD, and NT are not significantly different from each other (denoted by  ), but they are
                                                                                                        a
                   a
        and NT groups (denoted by  ).                           significantly different from the mean of the 5% RSV group (denoted by  ).
                        b
                                                                                                        b
                                              DOI: https://doi.org/10.36922/jctr.24.00019
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42