Page 21 - JCTR-9-4
P. 21

Marchand et al. | Journal of Clinical and Translational Research 2023; 9(4): 236-245   237
        in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles [7]. Kumar et al. [8] established   In  light  of  this  data,  we  found  that  there  were  sufficient
        that the failure of implantation occurs in approximately 10% of   RCTs performed on this topic to perform a meta-analysis, if the
        IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.     RCTs on RPL and RIF were combined (There was insufficient
          Many  factors  can  be  responsible  for  RPL/RIF. These  include   data separately.) Therefore, to see if a true difference exists, we
        abnormal embryonic karyotype (41%), uterine abnormalities (5%),   aimed to design a meta-analysis to assess all of the available data
        endocrine dysfunction (6%), and antiphospholipid antibody (APA)   regarding the effect of the 20% intravenous fat emulsion therapy
        syndrome (6%). Furthermore, it is estimated that the 25% of the   on  different  pregnancy  outcomes  in  women  with  RPL  or  RIF
        time, the cause is unexplained or that 4% of the cases occur from   undergoing IVF/ICSI.
        mixed causes [9]. Different studies have proposed an immunological
        explanation for the RIF/RPL phenomenon, especially in those cases   2. Materials and Methods
        that lack an identified cause [6,10]. There is no consensus whether   We  performed  this  systematic  review  and  meta-analysis
        the most common cause is the failure of the apposition, adhesion, or   accurately with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews
        invasion of the placenta into the uterine lining [11]. Immunological   of Interventions [31]. We reported our findings according to the
        causes  suspected  to  be  responsible  for  RPL/RIF  are  extensive,   Preferred  Reporting  Items  for  Systematic  Reviews  and  Meta-
        and  a  full  discussion  is  outside  the  realm  of  the  present  work.   Analyses (PRISMA) statement [32].
        However,  commonly  suspected  abnormalities  include  T-helper   We performed a computerized search in different databases
        cells ratio imbalance, the deregulation of T-cells, the deregulation   (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus and ISI Web of Science,
        of dendritic cells, natural killer (NK) cells in the uterus, APA, and   MEDLINE,  and  ClinicalTrials.gov)  during  February  of  2020.
        disorders of adaptive immunity and innate immunity, [12]. Various   We used the following search strategy: (intralipid OR intralipid
        other  biochemical  factors  have  also  been  investigated,  such  as   infusion  OR  soybean  oil  based  lipid  emulsion) AND  (control
        inflammatory mediators and human leukocyte antigens [13].  OR  comparator  OR  placebo  OR  saline  OR  no  intervention)
          Accordingly,  many  immunomodulatory  agents  have  been
        studied  to  reduce  RPL/RIF  rates. These  therapies  include  low-  AND  (pregnancy  OR  pregnant  OR  gestation  OR  recurrent
        molecular-weight  heparin,  aspirin,  intravenous  immunoglobulin   pregnancy loss OR recurrent implantation failure OR RPL OR
        (IVIG),  corticosteroids,  and  20%  intravenous  fat  emulsion   RIF) AND (clinical trial OR clinical trials OR trial OR random
        therapy  [14-17].  Despite  numerous  studies,  there  is  no  clear   OR random allocation OR RCT OR randomized controlled trial
        consensus regarding the efficacy of these therapies in improving   OR  controlled  clinical  trial). Two  investigators  performed  the
        different  pregnancy  outcomes.  This  includes  unclear  efficacy   search strategy. There were no restrictions by language or year
        in  rates  of  achieving  clinical  pregnancy,  maintaining  ongoing   of publication.
        pregnancies, and effect on live birth rates in patients with RPL   Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included using this
        and RIF [18].                                           criteria:
          Intralipid™ (20% intravenous fat emulsion) is a fat emulsion   (I) population: Women with RPL or RIF; (II) intervention: the
        solution that consists of soybean oil, glycerin, egg phospholipid,   20% intravenous fat emulsion therapy; (III) comparator: placebo
        water,  and  glycerol  [15].  The  medication  is  Food  and  Drug   (normal saline) or no intervention; and (IV) study design: RCTs.
        Administration  approved  for  the  administration  of  parenteral   We  excluded  studies  for  the  following  reasons:  (1)  reviews,
        nutrition in patients with ingestion problems and is administered   (2) irrelevant studies, (3) letters to editors, and (4) studies whose
        intravenously.  It  supplies  the  body  with  essential  fatty  acids,   data could not be extracted or entered into the analysis. Title and
        α-linolenic  acid,  and  omega-3  fatty  acids  [19].  Interestingly,   abstract  screening  and  full-text  screening  were  conducted  by
        several  studies  have  reported  on  benefits  of  intravenous  fat   appropriate step by step analysis by the same two authors.
        emulsion therapy outside of the field of parenteral nutrition and   Our data were initially extracted by the two authors on a data
        the medications intended indication. These include a reduction in   extraction  sheet.  The  extracted  data  included:  list  of  authors,
        platelet  aggregation,  decline  in  interleukin-2  (IL-2)  production,   year  of  publication,  sample  size,  and  summary  of  included
        suppression  of  NK  cell  activity,  and  inhibition  of  TH1  cell   studies. In addition, we extracted our primary outcome (clinical
        activity  [20].  Clearly,  these  properties  spark  an  interest  in  the   pregnancy rate) and our secondary outcomes (ongoing pregnancy,
        efficacy of this medication in the treatment of RPL and RIF.  miscarriage, live birth rates, and any adverse events of the 20%
          While there is ample evidence that intravenous fat emulsion   intravenous fat emulsion therapy). The category of adverse events
        therapy is effective in reducing the production of proinflammatory   was expanded to include reports of headache, dizziness, flushing,
        cytokines and the production of NK cells [21-23], whether the   drowsiness, nausea, vomiting, and sweating.
        medication  actually  improves  outcomes  in  patients  with  RPL   Clinical  pregnancies  were  defined  as  confirmation  of  fetal
        and RIF remains unclear. Before embarking on this review, we   cardiac  activity  through  sonography  or  Doppler,  and  this  was
        found conflicting bodies of evidence, with some studies reporting   found to be universally accepted in all included studies. Ongoing
        improved reproductive outcomes among patients with RPL/RIF   pregnancy was defined as a pregnancy that had reached more than
        undergoing  IVF/ICSI  when  receiving  the  20%  intravenous  fat   or  equal  to  20  gestational  weeks.  Miscarriage  was  determined
        emulsion  therapy  [24-26],  and  others  failing  to  show  any   as spontaneous abortion or pregnancy loss prior to 20 weeks of
        significant difference [27-30].                         gestation. Live birth was defined as the total number of deliveries
                                          DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18053/jctres.09.202304.23-00060
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26