Page 75 - MI-2-2
P. 75

Microbes & Immunity                                                   Biological activity of Amazonian plants



            2.5. Cytokine quantification                       (cell counting/Trypan blue staining). An optimal

            EHLC was treated with an optimal, low-toxicity     dilution of 1:1024, corresponding to 0.34  µg/mL for
            concentration of  plant  extract and  infected  with   both botanical species, was utilized to treat the EHLC
            SIVmac251 after 24 h. Supernatant samples were harvested   in culture. Cells were counted at time intervals ranging
            at 48, 144, and 240 h post-infection. The control groups   from 48 to 288  h post-treatment with plant extracts.
            included supernatant from uninfected cells and simian   Regarding LM extract treatment, at the initial and final
            immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-infected cells, SIV-  time intervals of 48 and 288 h, treated cells had 1.5 times
                                                                                                  5
            uninfected and plant extract-untreated cells, as well as   more cells than in the control (1.5 × 10  treated cells
                                                                         5
            SIV-uninfected and plant extract-treated cells. Plate wells   vs. 1.0 × 10  untreated cells) and 2.3  times more cells
                                                               than in the control (1.6 × 10  treated cells vs. 0.7 × 10
                                                                                       5
                                                                                                             5
            were sensitized overnight at 4°C with capture antibodies   untreated cells), respectively, with statistically significant
            for each IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and IFN-γ, diluted in   differences (p=0.0133 and p=0.0122, respectively). At the
            PBS according to the kit instructions (DuoSet ELISA   96-h time point, there was no significant difference in cell
            Development System, R&D Systems, United States).   density between treated and untreated cells (p=0.0842).
            After 4  times washes with buffer, the blocking solution   At  intermediate  intervals  of  144,  192,  and  240  h,  LM
            (PBS-BSA 1 – 0.05% NaN ) was added. Following a 1-h   extract-treated cells exhibited reduced growth than
                                 3
            incubation at room temperature, the wells were washed   in the control, with statistically significant differences
            again, and reference ILs and leukocyte cell culture   (p=0.0069, p=0.0177, and p=0.0039, respectively). Cells
            supernatant were added to each well in triplicate. Samples   treated with OH extract had exceptional cell growth at 48
            were incubated at room temperature for 2 h. Subsequently,   and 96 h post-treatment compared to the control, with
            diluted detection antibody solution was added to each   increases of about 3.3 times and 1.4 times (p=0.0182 and
            washed well. After 2-h incubation, streptavidin-peroxidase   p=0.0087, respectively). At 192 h, the growth of treated
            solution was introduced, followed by a 20 min incubation   cells dropped from 4.6 × 10  to 2.8 × 10  cells/mL, while
                                                                                                5
                                                                                      5
            and subsequent washing. Chromogenic substrate solution   untreated cells remained at 4.4 × 10  cells/mL (p=0.0087).
                                                                                            5
            (TMB) was then added, protected from light exposure,   At the final time interval of 288  h, OH extract-treated
            and incubated for 30 min. Sequentially, the reaction was   cells continued growing, reaching 1.5 × 10   cells/mL,
                                                                                                    5
            stopped with sulfuric acid solution, and absorbance was   whereas  the untreated cell  growth  declined to  0.5  ×
            measured at 450 nm using a multiplate spectrophotometer   10  cells/mL (p=0.0033). Comparing the mitotic activity
                                                                 5
            (Thermoplate, Italy), with results expressed in optical   between LM and OH extract treatments, OH extract-
            density.  These  results  were further  confirmed  by   treated cells generally showed higher cell density than in
            immunoassays for the same cytokines by utilizing ELISA   LM extract-treated cells. From 48 to 192 h, the mitotic
            kits kindly donated by ImmunoTools GmbH. 27        activity difference between OH and LM extract-treated
            2.6. Statistical analysis                          cells reduced from 2.4 times to 1.5 times in favor of OH
                                                               extract treatment (p=0.018,  p=0.0074, and  p=0.0170,
            The  obtained  data  were  analyzed  by  utilizing  GraphPad   respectively). At the final intervals of 192 – 288  h, the
            Prism software (version 10.4, US) and subjected to two-  difference in cell proliferation between the treatments
            way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison   was minimal (p=0.1001 and p=0.0125) (Figure 2).
            tests, where appropriate.
                                                                 EHLC    protection  against  lentivirus  infection
            3. Results                                         (SIVmac251) and/or viral protein synthesis, following
                                                               treatment with LM and OH extracts, was evaluated
            The UHPLC-PDA-MS analysis revealed betulinic acid   based on cell survival and cytopathic effects. LM extract
            and  niruriflavone  as  the  most  abundant compounds   treatment had significant protective effects at 144 h and
            in the leaf extract of LM. Additional compounds    192  h  (p=0.0127  and  p=0.0476,  respectively),  while  OH
            identified by comparison with the literature data included   extract treatment reduced the viral cytopathic effect at 96 h
            (-)-gallocatechin, (-)-epigallocatechin, and (-)-4’-O-methyl-  (p=0.0144). However, at the final time points of 240 h and
            epigallocatechin.
                                                               288  h, neither extract provided significant protection to
              Previously, cytokine production was not detected in the   the cells (Figure 3).
            Hut-78 cell line supernatant after stimulation with plant   Cytokine expression by cells after treated with
            extracts and SIV infection. Therefore, EHLC was generated   plant extracts and challenged with lentivirus infection
            to carry out experiments to detect cytokine production.  (SIVmac251), along with controls represented by
              The optimal plant extract dilution was determined   untreated and SIV-infected cells, showed the following
            based on cytotoxic assay results and phenotypic analysis   patterns. Regarding cells culture treated with OH extract


            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025)                         67                               doi: 10.36922/mi.8367
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80