Page 78 - MI-2-2
P. 78

Microbes & Immunity                                                   Biological activity of Amazonian plants



            extract treatment versus LM extract treatment and SIV   4. Discussion
            infection; OH extract treatment and SIV infection versus
            LM  extract treatment; OH extract treatment and SIV   Certainly, in vitro experiments have inherent limitations. In
            infection versus LM extract treatment and SIV infection.   natural lentivirus infections, the virus surpasses the initial
                                                               physical and biochemical barriers of the skin and mucosae,
            At the next time interval of 144 h, cells treated with OH   leading to virion phagocytosis and infection of CD4  T
                                                                                                           +
            extract and infected with SIV expressed significantly
            more IFN-γ than in cells treated with LM extract, whether   cells. Phagocytes, mainly macrophages and dendritic cells,
            infected with SIV or not (p-value ranging from 0.0073 to   work as Trojan horses, disseminating virions throughout
            0.0370),  as  well  as cells  treated  with  OH extract  or  LM   the  body,  including  hard-to-reach  tissues.  The  failure
                                                               of innate immune defenses triggers a battle between the
            extract alone (p-value ranging from 0.0177 to 0.0252).   adaptative immune response and the lentivirus’s multiple
            Other comparisons did not show any statistical differences
            (p-value ranging from 0.0557 to 0.7666) among the   evasion strategies, represented by the coordinated action of
            following conditions: OH extract treatment versus LM   T and B lymphocytes and other associated immune cells.
                                                               The generation of proviral forms in different infected cell
            extract treatment and SIV infection; LM extract treatment   populations and their migration to immune-privileged
            versus LM extract treatment and SIV infection. At the final   sites, such as gut-associated lymphoid tissue, the central
            240-h incubation period, cells treated with OH extract
            expressed significantly more IFN-γ than in cells treated   nervous system, lymph nodes, and myeloid cells, makes it
                                                               difficult to get rid of lentiviral infection.
                                                                                                  In this in vitro
                                                                                               31,32
            with OH extract and infected with SIV, as well as cells   system,  transiently  transformed  human  leukocytes  serve
            treated with LM extract and infected with SIV (p-value   as cell targets for SIV infection, along with established
            ranging from 0.0159 to 0.0475). In addition, cells treated   leukocyte cell lines such as Hut-78 and Molt-4,  which are
                                                                                                    33
            with LM extract produced significantly more IFN-γ than   very suitable for lentivirus infection but exhibit a limited
            in cells treated with LM extract and infected with SIV   immune response. 26,27  Therefore, this cell system represents
            (p=0.0338).  Other  comparisons  (OH  extract  treatment   a valuable model to evaluate cellular immune responses.
                                                                                                            27
            and  SIV infection  versus  LM extract  treatment and  SIV   A  collection  of  medicinal  plants  has  been  methodically
            infection; OH extract treatment and SIV infection versus   tested for antiretroviral activity, 17,33  with additional
            LM extract treatment; OH extract treatment versus LM   research focusing on immune responses triggered by
            extract treatment) did not show any significant statistical   natural products.  In the folklore medicine, particularly
                                                                             27
            differences (p-value ranging from 0.0887 to 0.2624).
                                                               in the Amazon region of Brazil, the therapeutic properties
              Summarizing the collective effects of plant extract   of medicinal plants, along with beliefs in their spiritual
            treatments on both uninfected and SIV-infected cells, the   healing abilities, are typically based on the symptoms and
            compounds from both plants positively modulate cytokine   signs observed in affected individuals. This knowledge has
            expression, highlighting their potential therapeutic   been passed down through generations among different
            applications. Considering the integration of the lentiviral   Amerindian ethnic groups.  Therefore, analysis is mainly
                                                                                     34
            genome,  the  behavior  of proviral  forms within the  cell   based by the indications of traditional medicine for the
            metabolism remains complex, influenced by a plethora of   treatment of cancer, diarrhea, renal and cardiovascular
            factors, including the metabolic stimuli imposed by the   diseases, diabetes, and other conditions. Among species
            plant compounds. IL-4 production is mostly triggered   of the  Chrysobalanaceae family, some are traditionally
            by OH extract (Figure 4), while IL-6 (Figure 5) and IL-8   used to treat infectious diseases, cancer, and diabetes. The
            (Figure  6)  expression  are induced by  both  extracts. The   Ochnaceae family, on the other hand, has a much broader
            synthesis of IL-10 (Figure 7) is mainly stimulated by LM   range of therapeutic applications, including antiretroviral
            extract, whereas IFN-γ expression (Figure 8) is much more   activity. 33
            modulated but strongly stimulated by both extracts.  Lentivirus infection in both humans and non-human
              In all experiments, cytokine production is proportional   primates increases the expression of inflammatory
            to the cell density (Figures  4-8). While manual cell   cytokines, prominently IL-8, alongside elevated SIV/
            counting on the microscope using Trypan blue staining   HIV viral proteins synthesis during the virus replication
            offers advantages over flow cytometry, such as the ability   cycle.  The consistently high IL-8 expression observed all
                                                                   35
            to visualize syncytia formation, which indicates the level   time intervals, up to 240 h (Figure 6), indicates persistent
            of protection conferred by extract treatment. Moreover,   SIVmac251 replication and chronic infection (Figure  3).
            the cell proliferation and mitotic activity induced by plant   This naturally occurs in lentivirus-infected hosts, mainly
            extracts (Figures  2 and  3) are clear, in contrast to the   in untreated individuals, as well as in in vivo experiments
            syncytium formation induced by lentivirus infection.  reported by other authors. Notably, the HIV/SIV  vpr


            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025)                         70                               doi: 10.36922/mi.8367
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83