Page 53 - MSAM-1-2
P. 53

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                     Process study of DED steel matrix composites


            improves the distribution of Si N  and AlN in Al6061   and determine the optimum process conditions for powder
                                        4
                                      3
            aluminum powder. While the process also decreases the   mixing.
            reinforcement particle size, it improved the composite   The effect of each variable on the density of the DED
            characteristics by eliminating the reinforcement particle   samples is shown in Figure 8. Table 6 shows the ranks and
            defects. Furthermore, the mechanical alloying also   deltas of the S/N ratios. The delta is the difference between
            improved the matrix characteristics due to deformation   the highest and lowest average response for each variable.
            and dislocations . During mechanical alloying, it is
                          [28]
            possible for the morphology of powders to change from   It was found that the variation of density was not
            spherical to flattened and finally to nearly spherical   significant across the various parameters and that the
            again . It was also observed that while the particle size of   effect of each of the variable was negligible on the density
                [29]
            the mixed powder decreases with increase in milling time,   of the DED 316/TiB  MMC. The spread of mean density
                                                                               2
            there is a limit after which, the particle size will remain   across the DED samples was <0.5% and the delta is <0.1
            stable due to equilibrium between the cold welding and   for all three variables. However, the DED samples were
            repeated fracture [30-32] . Hence, it is important to investigate   still denser compared to same material produced using
                                                               sintering  and  L-PBF .  Furthermore,  no  visible  pore  or
                                                                                [33]
                                                               crack was observed in the samples.
                                                               3.3. Microhardness

                                                               The mean and S/N ratio of the measured Vickers hardness
                                                               of the DED samples are shown in  Table 7. The mean
                                                               microhardness varied between 168.5 HV and 186.4
                                                               HV, which is similar to pure 316L samples produced by
                                                               DED .
                                                                   [34]
            Figure  7.  Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy element mapping for   The addition of TiB  did not increase the hardness as
                                                                                  2
            titanium. Red circles demarcate areas of high titanium concentrations,   compared to DED produced 316L stainless steel. This may
            which coincide with the location of precipitates seen in the scanning   be due to the low actual content of TiB  in the obtained
                                                                                               2
            electron microscopy image.                         DED samples. AlMangour  et al. found that there is a
                                                               critical weight fraction of TiB  between 3 wt.% and 6 wt.%
                                                                                      2
            Table 6. Response for density                      that would significantly increase the hardness values of
                                                               316L/TiB  MMC produced by L-PBF . In addition, Du
                                                                                             [33]
             Level  Laser power  Scanning speed  Hopper speed  et al. obtained 316/TiB2 MMC with up to 900 HV using 20
                                                                      2
             1        17.932        17.936        17.927       wt.% TiB  [15] . Hence, the TiB  content in the DED samples
                                                                      2
                                                                                      2
             2        17.922        17.930        17.926       must be increased to achieve higher hardness.
             3        17.924        17.912        17.926         The  effect  of  each  variable  on  the  microhardness  of
             Delta    0.0097        0.0235        0.0009       DED samples is shown in Figure 9. Table 8 shows the ranks
             Rank       2             1             3          and deltas of the S/N ratio for hardness.
            Table 7. Mean and S/N ratio of hardness

             Taguchi Number      Laser Power      Scanning Speed     Hopper Speed      Mean Hardness     S/N
                                    W               mm/min              rpm                HV
             1                      1000              200                200             183.5±8.5       45.244
             2                      1000              400                300             178.7±9.8       45.006
             3                      1000              600                400             186.0±8.4       45.367
             4                      1200              200                300            173.9±10.4       44.762
             5                      1200              400                400             186.4±5.1       45.399
             6                      1200              600                200             181.1±5.0       45.151
             7                      1400              200                400             181.9±9.9       45.161
             8                      1400              400                200             168.5±5.5       44.519
             9                      1400              600                300             177.6±6.1       44.977


            Volume 1 Issue 2 (2022)                         7                      http://doi.org/10.18063/msam.v1i2.13
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58