Page 52 - MSAM-1-2
P. 52

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                     Process study of DED steel matrix composites


            content in the MMC samples may be significantly lower   weight fraction of 6 wt.%. This indicates that the powder
            than 2 wt.%. This may account for the negligible differences   clouds formed during the DED process can be the TiB
                                                                                                             2
            in the results obtained for 316L/TiB  MMC as compared to   particles that escaped during the powder deposition.
                                        2
            pure 316L stainless steel.
                                                                 Even  though  TiB   particles  were  observed  to  be
                                                                                 2
            3.2. Density                                       adhering onto the 316L stainless steel particle surfaces, the
                                                               tumble mixing process did not induce sufficient adhesion
            The mean and S/N ratio of the measured density is   which caused the TiB  particles to separate from the 316L
            tabulated in Table 5, with the calculated weight fraction of   stainless steel particles during powder deposition. The
                                                                                2
            TiB  in the DED samples. The average weight fraction of   powder deposition step involves forces induced by the
               2
            TiB  is 2 wt.% which is significantly lower than the added
               2                                               gas flow to expulse the powder from the nozzle. Tumble
                                                               mixing is not suitable for mixing nanoparticle composites
            A                       B                          for DED as the process involves injecting the mixed powder
                                                               into a fast-moving gas stream. Larger TiB  particles can
                                                                                                  2
                                                               also be used as they are less likely to escape due to higher
                                                               gravitational force acting on them. Ball milling can be used
                                                                                                    [18]
                                                               to strengthen the adhesion during the mixing . During
                                                               ball milling, mechanical alloying is achieved due to the
                                                               repeated deformation, fracturing,  and cold  welding  of
                                                               the powder particles [18,26] . At the start, the reinforcement
            Figure 6. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy locations for (A) equiaxed   particles facture due to their brittleness before sticking onto
            and (B) columnar grains. Location 1 is within the matrix, location 2 is at   the matrix powder in which cold welding predominates due
            the sub-grain boundary, and location 3 is at the TiB  particle.  to plastic deformation. During the deformation and cold
                                             2
                                                               welding of the matrix powder particles, the reinforcement
            Table 4. Composition for equiaxed and columnar grains  particles then dispersed inside the matrix. Fracture then
                                                               takes over due to the matrix hardening. Finally, a dynamic
             Element    Equiaxed (wt.%)    Columnar (wt.%)     balance between cold welding and fracture ensures the
                    Matrix  Boundary  TiB  Matrix  Boundary  TiB
                                                                                   [27]
                                     2                   2     absence of agglomeration . In addition, the collisions can
             S       1.06    -     1.6   0.48    -      -      cause the break-up of agglomerated particles . However,
                                                                                                   [18]
             Cr      16.48  22.27  19.18  16.26  21.86  22.75  it is of interest to note that using larger particles or ball
             Mn      1.38   1.83    -    1.33   1.8    2.6     milling result in a morphological change to the powder,
             Fe      67.69  54.09  66.34  69.81  62.03  46.25  which, in turn, may affect the powder flowability. Hence,
             Ni      10.13  6.38   9.03  10.66  9.3    3.86    a careful control of the powder preparation parameters
                                                               is needed. With controlled parameters used during the
             Ti       -      -     3.85   -      -     5.57
             Mo       -     10.69   -     -     5.01   4.4     process, the centrifugal effect of  ball  milling  results  in
                                                               uniform dispersion of the reinforcement particles in
             Others  3.26   4.74    -    1.46    -    14.57    the  powder  mixture  with  minimum  change  in  powder
             Total   100     100   100   100    100    100     morphology. It has been found that mechanical alloying


            Table 5. Mean, S/N ratio of sample density, and calculated weight fraction of TiB
                                                                        2
             Taguchi number  Laser power (W)  Scanning speed (mm/min)  Hopper speed (rpm)  Mean density (g/cm )  S/N  f
                                                                                               3
             1                  1000               200                200            7.891±0.004   17.943  1.8%
             2                  1000               400                300            7.879±0.011   17.929  2.0%
             3                  1000               600                400            7.874±0.016   17.924  2.1%
             4                  1200               200                300            7.887±0.002   17.938  1.9%
             5                  1200               400                400            7.876±0.002   17.926  2.0%
             6                  1200               600                200            7.855±0.012   17.903  2.4%
             7                  1400               200                400            7.876±0.003   17.927  2.0%
             8                  1400               400                200            7.883±0.006   17.934  1.9%
             9                  1400               600                300            7.862±0.008   17.910  2.3%


            Volume 1 Issue 2 (2022)                         6                      http://doi.org/10.18063/msam.v1i2.13
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57