Page 66 - MSAM-1-3
P. 66

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                       Inconel 718-CoCrMo bimetallic structures


            powder (Stellite Coatings, Goshen, IN) was used with   were taken for each point. For the compression tests, an
            a particle size range of 50–100  μm. The bimetallic   Instron servohydraulic compression tester was used to
            structures were optimized until the part height was close   determine the  stress-strain curves for  the longitudinal
            to the theoretical height. The final parameters for each   and transverse bimetallic samples and the base materials
            sample are listed in Table 1.                      using a strain rate of 1.3 mm/min. For the oxidation tests, a
                                                               muffle furnace with no other additions was used to oxidize
            2.2. Characterization of bimetallic samples
                                                               samples for 96 h at 800°C and then underwent the same
            Bimetallic samples were cut in half and underwent a   characterization process mentioned above.
            typical grinding or polishing procedure. The samples
            were then imaged using a field emission scanning electron   3. Results
            microscope (FESEM, FEI-SIRION, Portland, OR) to    3.1. Microstructural variations
            determine if any defects existed at the interface. Using the
            energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS; EDAX), elemental   Figure  2 shows a  stereoscope image of  the bimetallic
            maps were obtained to examine elemental distributions   sample on a 316L substrate and the SEM/EDS analysis
            at the interface. Vicker’s hardness testing (Penn Tool Co,   of the interface. A small but distinct interface is formed
            NJ) was performed along the interface and compared to   between the CoCrMo and substrate. The same can be
            the base materials’ hardness. At least 15 measurements   observed between the Inconel 718 and CoCrMo junction,
































            Figure 1. Processing strategies of bimetallic structures of Inconel 718-CoCrMo using laser directed energy deposition process.

            Table 1. Final DED build parameters for Inconel 718, CoCrMo, and bimetallic samples
             Type of sample              Inconel 718   CoCrMo   Inconel 718   CoCrMo laser  Inconel 718  CoCrMo   Layer
                                          scanning   scanning speed  laser power (W)  power (W)  flow rate   flow rate   height
                                           speed    (mm/min)                            (mm/s)  (m m/s)  (mm)
                                         (mm/min)
            Oxidation and Characterization Bimetallic  1200  1600  350         350       0.5      0.6    0.1
            Inconel 718 Compression        1600                    350                   0.5             0.1
            CoCrMo Compression                         600                     300                0.5    0.25
            Transverse Bimetallic           600       1200         300         300       0.25     0.5    0.25
            Longitudinal Bimetallic         800       1200         300         300       0.3      0.5    0.2
            DED: Directed energy deposition


            Volume 1 Issue 3 (2022)                         3                      https://doi.org/10.18063/msam.v1i3.18
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71