Page 61 - MSAM-1-3
P. 61

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                             Characterization of TPMS structures





























                                     Figure 13. Deformation process of the Schwarz-P structure: sample B0.8.

                         A                       B                        C












                         D                       E












            Figure 14. Fracture surface morphology of Schwarz-P structure: sample A0.6. (A) fracture macro-surface at a low magnification of ×200. (B), (C), (D), and
            (E) show the fracture micro-surface at high magnification of ×500, ×2000, ×2000, and ×10000, respectively.

                           E                                the results. The results are shown in Figure 13. In general,
                       ln   p    ln C    n ln (  p )  (V)  the compression process had three stages:

                                       1
                                   1
                           E s             s                (i)  Initial elastic stage. During this stage, as the
                           E              p                    compression displacement increased, the compressive
                            p
                        ln     =  ln C ( ) + 2ln (  )  (VI)     stress increased rapidly until it reached the maximum
                                    1
                            E             s                    value, but the strain changed slowly. The compressive
                            s
                                                                  strain and stress thus exhibited a linear relationship.
            3.4. Compression failure mechanism                 (ii)  Plastic  plateau  stage.  During  this  stage,  a  localized
            To investigate the failure mechanism of the Schwarz-P   bulging phenomenon began to occur in the middle
            structures, the crushing behavior of the samples was   region of the Schwarz-P structure (as shown in
            recorded, and a typical sample B0.8 was chosen to explain   Figure 13, point 2). With further increases in the

            Volume 1 Issue 3 (2022)                         10                     http://doi.org/10.18063/msam.v1i3.17
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66