Page 84 - MSAM-1-4

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing Survey of AM reviews

Available from: https://www.sandia.gov/media/lens.htm 48. Luo Z, Zhao Y, 2018, A survey of finite element analysis of
[Last accessed on 2018 Dec 09]. temperature and thermal stress fields in powder bed fusion
37. Griffith ML, Harwell LD, Romero J, et al., 1997, Multi- additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf, 21: 318–332.
material Processing by LENS. In: Solid Freeform Fabrication https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADDMA.2018.03.022
Symposium Conference. Austin Texas. pp. 11–13.
49. McCann R, Obeidi MA, Hughes C, et al., 2021, In-situ
https://doi.org/10.2966/scrip.040407.436 sensing, process monitoring and machine control in laser
38. Griffith ML, Ensz MT, Puskar JD, et al., 2000, Understanding powder bed fusion: A review. Addit Manuf, 45: 102058.
the Microstructure and Properties of Components Fabricated https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADDMA.2021.102058
by Laser Engineered Net Shaping (LENS). In: MRS
Proceeding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pressp. pp9. 50. Wickramasinghe S, Do T, Tran P, 2020, FDM-Based 3D
printing of polymer and associated composite: A review on
https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-625-9 mechanical properties, defects and treatments. Polymers,
39. Taminger KM, Hafley RA, 2006, Electron Beam 12: 1529.
Freeform Fabrication for Cost Effective Near-Net Shape https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM12071529
Manufacturing. In: NATO/RTO AVT-139 Spec. Meet
Cost Effective Manufacturing. via Net Shape Process. 51. Dey A, Yodo N, 2019, A systematic survey of FDM process
Amsterdam. Available from: https://www.ntrs.nasa.gov/ parameter optimization and their influence on part
search.jsp?R=20080013538 [Last accessed on 2018 Dec 09]. characteristics. J Manuf Mater Process, 3: 64.
40. Weng F, Gao S, Jiang J, et al., 2019, A novel strategy to https://doi.org/10.3390/JMMP3030064
fabricate thin 316L stainless steel rods by continuous direct 52. Ziaee M, Crane NB, 2019, Binder jetting: A review of
metal deposition in Z direction. Addit Manuf, 27: 474–481. process, materials, and methods. Addit Manuf, 28: 781–801.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.024 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADDMA.2019.05.031
41. Jiang J, Weng F, Gao S, et al., 2019, A support interface 53. Pagac M, Hajnys J, Ma QP, et al., A review of vat
method for easy part removal in direct metal deposition. photopolymerization technology: Materials, applications,
Manuf Lett, 20: 30–33. challenges, and future trends of 3D printing. Polymers,13: 598.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2019.04.002 https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM13040598.
42. Aduba DC, Margaretta ED, Marnot AE, et al., 2019, Vat 54. Gülcan O, Günaydın K, Tamer A, 2021, The state of the art of
photopolymerization 3D printing of acid-cleavable PEG- material jetting-a critical review. Polymers(Basel), 13: 2829.
methacrylate networks for biomaterial applications. Mater
Today Commun, 19: 204–211. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM13162829
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTCOMM.2019.01.003 55. Grasso M, Colosimo BM, 2017, Process defects and in situ
monitoring methods in metal powder bed fusion: A review.
43. Cooper KG, 2001, Rapid prototyping technology: Selection Meas Sci Technol, 28: 044005.
and application. Assem Autom, 21: 358–359.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/AA5C4F
https://doi.org/10.1108/aa.2001.21.4.358.1
56. Dass A, Moridi A, 2019, State of the art in directed energy
44. Pham DT, Ji C, 2000, Design for stereolithography. Proc Inst deposition: From additive manufacturing to materials
Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci, 214: 635–640. design. Coatings, 9,: 418.
https://doi.org/10.1243/0954406001523650 https://doi.org/10.3390/COATINGS9070418
45. Himmer T, Nakagawa T, Anzai M, 1999, Lamination of 57. Ahn DG, 2021, Directed energy deposition (DED) process:
metal sheets. Comput Ind, 39: 27–33. State of the art. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Technol, 8: 703–742.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-3615(98)00122-5 https://doi.org/10.1007/S40684-020-00302-7
46. Nohut S, Schwentenwein M, 2022, Vat photopolymerization 58. Chartrain NA, Williams CB, Whittington AR, 2018, A review
additive manufacturing of functionally graded materials: on fabricating tissue scaffolds using vat photopolymerization.
A review. J Manuf Mater Process, 6: 17.
Acta Biomater, 74: 90–111.
https://doi.org/10.3390/JMMP6010017
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2018.05.010
47. Xu X, Awad A, Robles-Martinez P, et al., 2021, Vat 59. Andreu A, Su PC, Kim JH, et al., 2021, 4D printing materials
photopolymerization 3D printing for advanced drug
delivery and medical device applications. J Control Release, for vat photopolymerization. Addit Manuf, 44: 102024.
329: 743–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADDMA.2021.102024
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCONREL.2020.10.008 60. Maurel A, Martinez AC, Grugeon S, et al., 2021, Toward

Volume 1 Issue 4 (2022) 15 https://doi.org/10.18063/msam.v1i4.21