Page 38 - MSAM-2-1
P. 38

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                             3D-printed nozzle for 3D bioprinting




                          A                   B











                                              C







            Figure 3. Gelation continuity tests of DNC. (A) Continuous extrusion of peptide bioink thread showing gelation and stiffness. (B) Extrusion of continuous
            five-segment line at different flow rates to optimize bioink formation. (C) Six-layer cubical constructs showing printability and layer deposition, top view,
            and side view.
            DNC: Disposable nozzle connectors.
              In terms of gelation continuity, the best flow rate profile   A          B
            was found to be 55 µL/min, 20 µL/min, and 20 µL/min
            for the  peptide hydrogel, ×7 PBS,  and  ×1 PBS inlets,
            respectively. Different flow profiles were tested by printing
            a continuous 5-segment line, which visibly indicated the
            period of  flow  before  clumps  were  formed  from  over-
            gelation. A  visible thread of gel was also extruded and
            displayed gel continuity and stiffness, a prime indicator for
            printability (Figure 3A). Gelation time for the formation
            of a stable bioink thread was found to be approximately
            81 s, which was relatively faster than homemade nozzles.
            Hence, the optimal flow rates were set according to these
            observations to be used for further printability assessments
            (Figure 3B). It was observed that lower flow rates resulted
            in insufficient flow, which was expected given the mixing
            region ratio. The gelation therein needed to be accelerated
            by increasing the overall flow to 95 µL/min.
              A six-layer semi-filled cube of dimensions
            10 × 10 × 2 mm was 3D-printed using the DNC. Based   Figure 4. 3D printing of peptide-based acellular constructs with DNC.
            on the gelation continuity test, the optimized flow rates   Different levels of shape complexity were selected: Hollow cylinder
            were set to 55 µL/min, 20 µL/min, and 20 µL/min for the   10 × 10 × 13 mm  (A), and fine grid 20 mm  (B).
                                                                          3
                                                                                           2
            three inlets of peptide, ×7 PBS, and ×1 PBS, respectively.   3D: Three-dimensional; DNC: Disposable nozzle connectors.
            The cubical shape was found to be well maintained with
            defined lines (Figure  3C, Cube). No clumps or clogs   3.3. 3D printing shape fidelity and resolution
            were  observed  during  printing  –  A  key  marker  of  the   To test the DNC, several acellular constructs with different
            nozzle performance through consistent formation of   levels of complexity were printed. In addition, automated
            bioink  thread.  In  addition,  the  construct  layers  piled   square wave flow profiles were programmed for the
            up smoothly without any sagging, which also indicated   microfluidic pumps to enable smoother flow for longer
            continuous layer deposition. For further verification, the   periods.  This  was  found  to  ease  printing  considerably,
            peptide flow rate was increased to 60 µL/min for another   allowing for 20-min prints without flow interruptions
            construct, but results showed lower printing resolution   or the need for user intervention to manually alter flow
            due to several clumps, most likely due to the slightly   rates. First, a hollow cylinder of 10 × 10 × 13 mm  was
                                                                                                         3
            accelerated gelation.                              printed (Figure 4A). This highlighted the layer-by-layer

            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2023)                         6                        https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.52
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43