Page 40 - MSAM-2-1
P. 40

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                             3D-printed nozzle for 3D bioprinting



            form  3D-bioprinted  structures. The  results  suggest that      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
            HDFn is well suited for the IVZK hydrogel materials   2.   Ford S, Minshall T, 2019, Invited review article: Where and
            post-printing, as demonstrated by cytotoxicity tests,   how 3D printing is used in teaching and education. Addit
            which confirms the biocompatibility of the DNC in 3D   Manuf, 25: 131–150.
            bioprinting. We propose the DNC as a solid alternative to      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.028
            the fabrication of handmade nozzles for 3D bioprinting by
            taking full advantage of rapid prototyping and ensuring   3.   Shahrubudin N, Lee TC, Ramlan R, 2019, An overview
            standardization and reproducibility.                  on 3D printing technology: Technological, materials, and
                                                                  applications. Procedia Manuf, 35: 1286–1296.
            Acknowledgments                                       https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.089

            The authors would like to acknowledge Kowther Kahin   4.   Gao W, Zhang Y, Ramanujan D,  et  al., 2015, The status,
            for her dedicated work in nozzle design, which inspired   challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in
            this work, Noofa Hammad for her technical support on   engineering. Comput Aided Des, 69: 65–89.
            the robotic 3D bioprinter, and Aris Konstantinidis for his      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001
            support in conducting the experiments.
                                                               5.   Avila-Ramírez A, Valle-Pérez AU, Susapto HH, et al., 2021,
            Funding                                               Ecologically friendly biofunctional ink for reconstruction of
                                                                  rigid living systems under wet conditions. Int J Bioprint, 7: 398.
            This work was financially supported by King Abdullah
            University of Science and Technology (KAUST).         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i4.398
                                                               6.   Albalawi HI, Khan ZN, Valle-Pérez AU,  et al., 2021,
            Conflicts of interest                                 Sustainable and eco-friendly coral restoration through
                                                                  3D printing and fabrication.  ACS Sustain. Chem Eng,
            There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
                                                                  9: 12634–12645.
            Author contributions                                  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c04148
            Conceptualization: Hamed I. Albalawi, Charlotte A. E.   7.   Wangpraseurt D, You S, Azam F, et al., 2020, et al. Bionic 3D
               Hauser                                             printed corals. Nat Commun, 11: 1748.
            Investigation: Hamed I. Albalawi, Zainab N. Khan,      https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15486-4
               Ranim H. Rawas, Alexander U. Valle-Pérez, Sherin   8.   Melchels FP, Domingos MA, Klein TJ, et al., 2012, Additive
               Abdelrahman                                        manufacturing of tissues and organs.  Prog Polym Sci,
            Methodology: Hamed I. Albalawi, Zainab N. Khan, Sherin   37: 1079–1104.
               Abdelrahman
            Writing – original draft: Hamed I. Albalawi, Zainab N.      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.11.007
               Khan, Ranim H. Rawas, Alexander U. Valle-Pérez  9.   Murphy SV, De Coppi P, Atala A, 2019, Opportunities and
            Writing – review & editing: Zainab N. Khan, Hamed I.   challenges of translational 3D bioprinting. Nat Biomed Eng,
               Albalawi, Charlotte A. E. Hauser                   4: 370–380.
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-019-0471-7
                                                               10.  Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al., 2020, Vat polymerization-
            Not applicable.                                       based bioprinting-process, materials, applications and
                                                                  regulatory challenges. Biofabrication, 12: 022001.
            Consent for publication
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab6034
            Not applicable.
                                                               11.  Li W, Mille LS, Robledo JA, et al., 2020, Recent advances
            Availability of data                                  in formulating and processing biomaterial inks for vat
                                                                  polymerization‐based 3D printing.  Adv Healthc Mater,
            Data related to this work can be acquired by contacting the   9: 2000156.
            corresponding author with a reasonable justification.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202000156
            References                                         12.  Elomaa L, Gerbeth L, Almalla A,  et al., 2023, Bioactive
                                                                  photocrosslinkable resin solely based on refined decellularized
            1.   Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G,  et  al., 2018, Additive
               manufacturing (3D printing): A  review of materials,   small intestine submucosa for vat photopolymerization
               methods, applications and challenges. Compos Part B Eng,   of in vitro tissue mimics. Addit Manuf, 64: 103439.
               143: 172–196.                                      https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-f2hpc


            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2023)                         8                        https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.52
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45