Page 122 - MSAM-2-3

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing SLA 3D printed triaxial nozzle

engineering hydrogels. Science, 356: eaaf3627. a Robotic 3D Bioprinting and Microfluidic Pumping System
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf3627 for Tissue and Organ Engineering. In: Proceedings of SPIE,
Microfluidics, BioMEMS, and Medical Microsystems XVII,
9. Malda J, Visser J, Melchels FP, et al., 2013, 25 anniversary San Francisco, United States.
th
article: Engineering hydrogels for biofabrication. Adv Mater,
25: 5011–5028. 21. Khan Z, Kahin K, Rauf S, et al., 2019, Optimization of a 3D
bioprinting process using ultrashort peptide bioinks. Int J
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201302042 Bioprinting, 5: 173.
10. Zhao F, Shi Y, Pan L, et al., 2017, Multifunctional https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v5i1.173
nanostructured conductive polymer gels: Synthesis,
properties, and applications. Acc Chem Res, 50: 1734–1743. 22. Khan Z, Kahin K, Hauser C, 2021, Time-dependent Pulsing
of Microfluidic Pumps to Enhance 3D Bioprinting of
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00191 Peptide Bioinks. In: Microfluidics, BioMEMS, and Medical
11. Ouyang L, Highley CB, Rodell CB, et al., 2016, 3D printing Microsystems XIX, United States.
of shear-thinning hyaluronic acid hydrogels with secondary https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2578830
cross-linking. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2: 1743–1751.
23. Abdelrahman S, Alsanie WF, Khan ZN, et al., 2022, A
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00158
Parkinson’s disease model composed of 3D bioprinted
12. Jungst T, Smolan W, Schacht K, et al., 2016, Strategies and dopaminergic neurons within a biomimetic peptide scaffold.
molecular design criteria for 3D printable hydrogels. Chem Biofabrication, 14: 044103.
Rev, 116: 1496–1539.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac7eec
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00303
24. Domingos M, Intranuovo F, Russo T, et al., 2013, The
13. Ouyang L, Highley CB, Sun W, et al., 2017, A generalizable first systematic analysis of 3D rapid prototyped poly(ε-
strategy for the 3D bioprinting of hydrogels from nonviscous caprolactone) scaffolds manufactured through BioCell
photo‐crosslinkable inks. Adv Mater, 29: 1604983. printing: The effect of pore size and geometry on
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201604983 compressive mechanical behaviour and in vitro hMSC
viability. Biofabrication, 5: 045004.
14. Wang Y, Zhang S, Wang J, 2021, Photo-crosslinkable hydrogel
and its biological applications. Chin Chem Lett, 32: 1603–1614. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/5/4/045004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.11.073 25. Lee JW, Ahn G, Kim JY, et al., 2010, Evaluating cell
proliferation based on internal pore size and 3D scaffold
15. Naghieh S, 2020, Extrusion Bioprinting of Hydrogel architecture fabricated using solid freeform fabrication
Scaffolds: Printability and Mechanical Behavior. Canada:
University of Saskatchewan. technology. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 21: 3195–3205.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-010-4173-7
16. Hauser CA, Deng R, Mishra A, et al., 2011, Natural tri- to
hexapeptides self-assemble in water to amyloid beta-type 26. Sobral JM, Caridade SG, Sousa RA, et al., 2011, Three-
fiber aggregates by unexpected alpha-helical intermediate dimensional plotted scaffolds with controlled pore size
structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 108: 1361–1366. gradients: Effect of scaffold geometry on mechanical
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014796108 performance and cell seeding efficiency. Acta Biomater,
7: 1009–1018.
17. Loo Y, Chan YS, Szczerbinska I, et al., 2019, A chemically
well-defined, self-assembling 3D substrate for long-term https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.003
culture of human pluripotent stem cells. ACS Appl Bio 27. Schuller T, Fanzio P, Galindo-Rosales FJ, 2022, Analysis of
Mater, 2: 1406–1412. the importance of shear-induced elastic stresses in material
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.8b00686 extrusion. Addit Manuf, 57: 102952.
18. Mishra A, Loo Y, Deng R, et al., 2011, Ultrasmall natural https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.102952
peptides self-assemble to strong temperature-resistant 28. Skylar-Scott MA, Mueller J, Visser CW, et al., 2019,
helical fibers in scaffolds suitable for tissue engineering. Voxelated soft matter via multimaterial multinozzle 3D
Nano Today, 6: 232–239. printing. Nature, 575: 330–335.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2011.05.001 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1736-8
19. Wu EC, Zhang S, Hauser CA, 2012, Self-assembling peptides 29. Albalawi HI, Khan ZN, Rawas RH, et al., 2023, 3D-printed
as cell-interactive scaffolds. Adv Funct Mater, 22: 456–468. disposable nozzles for cost-efficient extrusion-based 3D
https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201101905 bioprinting. Mater Sci Addit Manuf, 2: 52.
20. Kahin K, Khan Z, Albagami M, et al., 2019, Development of https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.52

Volume 2 Issue 3 (2023) 11 https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.1786