Page 121 - MSAM-2-3
P. 121
Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing SLA 3D printed triaxial nozzle
IIFK peptide bioink was performed. Endothelial cells Methodology: Hamed I. Albalawi, Dana M. Alhattab, Aris
and the vasculature are essential constituents of every P. Konstantinidis, Yousef Altayeb
tissue, and having a bioprinting system that maintains Writing – original draft: Hamed I. Albalawi, Aris P.
the viability and functionality of these cells is crucial for Konstantinidis, Dana M. Alhattab, Khadija B. Shirazi,
tissue engineering applications [38,39] . In this regard, cell Yousef Altayeb
viability was observed at days 5 and 10 post-printing Writing – review & editing: Dana M. Alhattab, KS, Charlotte
using Live/Dead assay (Figure 5A). The results revealed a A. E. Hauser
high percent of cell viability at all measured time points,
indicating the peptide bioink’s cytocompatibility and Ethics approval and consent to participate
nozzle design’s suitability toward more delicate cell types. Not applicable.
Importantly, cytoskeleton staining of endothelial cell-laden
constructs at day 12 post-printing revealed interesting Consent for publication
results. Endothelial cells within the printed scaffold Not applicable.
demonstrated morphological changes into elongated cells
with cell-cell connections and interactions, indicating Availability of data
the establishment of cell differentiation and proliferation
processes (Figure 5B). In addition, alignments of Raw data can be shared with the readers by contacting the
endothelial cells forming tube-like structures were found corresponding author.
in different areas in the printed scaffolds (Figure 5B). References
4. Conclusions 1. Kafle A, Luis E, Silwal R, et al., 2021, 3D/4D printing of
polymers: Fused deposition modelling (FDM), selective
In this paper, an integrated 3D printing approach for laser sintering (SLS), and stereolithography (SLA). Polymers
the fabrication of 3D bioprinting nozzles for hydrogel (Basel), 13: 3101.
bioink extrusion is proposed. The nozzle design integrates
three Luer-Lok-compatible inlets and an outlet within https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13183101
the printed body, eliminating the need for manual 2. Mirzaali MJ, Moosabeiki V, Rajaai SM, et al., 2022, Additive
assembly and improving the fabrication consistency and manufacturing of biomaterials-design principles and their
quality. Moreover, it incorporates backflow prevention implementation. Materials (Basel), 15: 5457.
features aimed at minimizing backflow at the mixing https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15155457
region, thus avoiding clogging caused by over-gelation. 3. Mehrpouya M, Dehghanghadikolaei A, Fotovvati B, et al.,
We also demonstrated its potential in 3D bioprinting 2019, The potential of additive manufacturing in the smart
applications by printing cell-laden constructs and proving factory industrial 4.0: A review. Appl Sci, 9: 3865.
biocompatibility and cell viability after 3D bioprinting.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app9183865
Acknowledgments 4. Prashar G, Vasudev H, Bhuddhi D, 2022, Additive
The authors acknowledge the bioimaging and characterization manufacturing: Expanding 3D printing horizon in industry
4.0. Int J Interact Des Manuf (IJIDeM), 6:1–15.
core laboratories for confocal microscopy use.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-022-00956-4
Funding
5. Jiang Z, Diggle B, Tan ML, et al., 2020, Extrusion 3D printing
This work was financially supported by King Abdullah of polymeric materials with advanced properties. Adv Sci
University of Science and Technology under the KAUST- (Weinh), 7: 2001379.
Smart Health Initiative (project number: REI/1/4938). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202001379
Conflict of interest 6. Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, et al., 2017, Polymers for 3D
printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Rev, 117: 10212–10290.
Author contributions https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074
7. Lin Q, Li L, Luo S, 2019, Asymmetric electrochemical
Conceptualization: Hamed I. Albalawi, Aris P. Konstantinidis, catalysis. Chemistry, 25: 10033–10044.
Dana M. Alhattab, Charlotte A. E. Hauser
Investigation: Hamed I. Albalawi, Dana M. Alhattab, Aris P. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201901284
Konstantinidis, Yousef Altayeb 8. Zhang YS, Khademhosseini A, 2017, Advances in
Volume 2 Issue 3 (2023) 10 https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.1786

