Page 121 - MSAM-2-3
P. 121

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                                 SLA 3D printed triaxial nozzle



            IIFK peptide bioink was performed. Endothelial cells   Methodology: Hamed I. Albalawi, Dana M. Alhattab, Aris
            and  the  vasculature  are  essential  constituents  of  every   P. Konstantinidis, Yousef Altayeb
            tissue, and having  a bioprinting system  that maintains   Writing – original draft:  Hamed  I.  Albalawi,  Aris  P.
            the viability and functionality of these cells is crucial for   Konstantinidis, Dana M. Alhattab, Khadija B. Shirazi,
            tissue engineering applications [38,39] . In this regard, cell   Yousef Altayeb
            viability was observed at days 5 and 10 post-printing   Writing – review & editing: Dana M. Alhattab, KS, Charlotte
            using Live/Dead assay (Figure 5A). The results revealed a   A. E. Hauser
            high percent of cell viability at all measured time points,
            indicating the peptide bioink’s cytocompatibility and   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            nozzle design’s suitability toward more delicate cell types.   Not applicable.
            Importantly, cytoskeleton staining of endothelial cell-laden
            constructs at day 12  post-printing revealed interesting   Consent for publication
            results.  Endothelial cells within  the  printed  scaffold   Not applicable.
            demonstrated morphological changes into elongated cells
            with cell-cell connections and interactions, indicating   Availability of data
            the establishment of cell differentiation and proliferation
            processes (Figure  5B). In addition, alignments of   Raw data can be shared with the readers by contacting the
            endothelial cells forming tube-like structures were found   corresponding author.
            in different areas in the printed scaffolds (Figure 5B).  References
            4. Conclusions                                     1.   Kafle A, Luis E, Silwal R,  et al., 2021, 3D/4D printing of
                                                                  polymers: Fused deposition modelling (FDM), selective
            In this paper, an integrated 3D printing approach for   laser sintering (SLS), and stereolithography (SLA). Polymers
            the fabrication of 3D bioprinting nozzles for hydrogel   (Basel), 13: 3101.
            bioink extrusion is proposed. The nozzle design integrates
            three Luer-Lok-compatible inlets and an outlet within      https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13183101
            the printed body, eliminating the need for manual   2.   Mirzaali MJ, Moosabeiki V, Rajaai SM, et al., 2022, Additive
            assembly and improving the fabrication consistency and   manufacturing of biomaterials-design principles and their
            quality.  Moreover,  it  incorporates  backflow  prevention   implementation. Materials (Basel), 15: 5457.
            features aimed at minimizing backflow at the mixing      https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15155457
            region, thus avoiding clogging caused by over-gelation.   3.   Mehrpouya M, Dehghanghadikolaei A, Fotovvati B, et al.,
            We also demonstrated its potential in 3D bioprinting   2019, The potential of additive manufacturing in the smart
            applications by printing cell-laden constructs and proving   factory industrial 4.0: A review. Appl Sci, 9: 3865.
            biocompatibility and cell viability after 3D bioprinting.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.3390/app9183865
            Acknowledgments                                    4.   Prashar G, Vasudev H, Bhuddhi D, 2022, Additive
            The authors acknowledge the bioimaging and characterization   manufacturing: Expanding 3D printing horizon in industry
                                                                  4.0. Int J Interact Des Manuf (IJIDeM), 6:1–15.
            core laboratories for confocal microscopy use.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-022-00956-4
            Funding
                                                               5.   Jiang Z, Diggle B, Tan ML, et al., 2020, Extrusion 3D printing
            This work was financially supported by King Abdullah   of polymeric materials with advanced properties.  Adv Sci
            University of Science and Technology under the KAUST-  (Weinh), 7: 2001379.
            Smart Health Initiative (project number: REI/1/4938).     https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202001379
            Conflict of interest                               6.   Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, et al., 2017, Polymers for 3D
                                                                  printing and customized additive manufacturing.  Chem
            The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.  Rev, 117: 10212–10290.
            Author contributions                                  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074
                                                               7.   Lin Q, Li L, Luo S, 2019, Asymmetric electrochemical
            Conceptualization: Hamed I. Albalawi, Aris P. Konstantinidis,   catalysis. Chemistry, 25: 10033–10044.
               Dana M. Alhattab, Charlotte A. E. Hauser
            Investigation: Hamed I. Albalawi, Dana M. Alhattab, Aris P.      https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201901284
               Konstantinidis, Yousef Altayeb                  8.   Zhang YS, Khademhosseini A, 2017, Advances in


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2023)                         10                      https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.1786
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126