Page 123 - MSAM-2-3
P. 123

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                                 SLA 3D printed triaxial nozzle



            30.  Susapto HH,  Alhattab D, Abdelrahman S, et al., 2021,   35.  Shi J, Wu B, Li S, et al., 2018, Shear stress analysis and its
               Ultrashort peptide bioinks support automated printing of   effects on cell viability and cell proliferation in drop-on-
               large-scale constructs assuring long-term survival of printed   demand bioprinting. Biomed Phys Eng Express, 4: 045028.
               tissue constructs. Nano Lett, 21: 2719–2729.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/aac946
               https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04426
                                                               36.  Alhattab DM, Khan Z, Alshehri S, et al., 2023, 3D bioprinting
            31.  Alhattab D, Jamali F, Ali D, et al., 2019, An insight into the   of ultrashort self-assembling peptides to engineer scaffolds
               whole transcriptome profile of four tissue-specific human   with  different  matrix  stiffness  for  chondrogenesis.  Int J
               mesenchymal stem cells. Regen Med, 14: 841–865.    Bioprint, 9: 719.
               https://doi.org/10.2217/rme-2018-0137
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.719
            32.  Zhang Y, Liu Y, Xu Z,  et al., 2020, Nucleation-controlled   37.  Rauf S, Susapto HH, Kahin K, et al., 2021, Self-assembling
               growth of superior lead-free perovskite Cs Bi I  single-crystals
                                              2 9
                                            3
               for high-performance X-ray detection. Nat Commun, 11: 2304.  tetrameric peptides allow  in situ 3D bioprinting under
                                                                  physiological conditions. J Mater Chem B, 9: 1069–1081.
               https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16034-w
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb02424d
            33.  Gungor-Ozkerim PS, Inci I, Zhang YS, et al., 2018, Bioinks
               for 3D bioprinting: An overview. Biomater Sci, 6: 915–946.  38.  Daly AC, Prendergast ME, Hughes AJ,  et al., 2021,
                                                                  Bioprinting for the biologist. Cell, 184: 18–32.
               https://doi.org/10.1039/c7bm00765e
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.002
            34.  Silva C, Cortés-Rodriguez CJ, Hazur J, et al., 2020, Rational
               design of a triple-layered coaxial extruder system: In silico   39.  Sohn  S, Van  Buskirk  M,  Buckenmeyer  MJ,  et al.,  2020,
               and  in vitro evaluations directed toward optimizing cell   Whole organ engineering: Approaches, challenges, and
               viability. Int J Bioprint, 6: 282.                 future directions. Appl Sci, 10: 4277.
               https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v6i4.282              https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124277















































            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2023)                         12                      https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.1786
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128