Page 116 - MSAM-2-3
P. 116

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                                 SLA 3D printed triaxial nozzle



            USA)  supplemented with  5%  human  platelet  lysate   2.7.2. Cytoskeleton staining
            (StemCell Technologies, USA), 2 mM L-glutamine, and 1%   The cell-laden constructs were first fixed with 4%
            penicillin/streptomycin (GIBCO, ThermoFisher, USA).  formaldehyde solution for 30  min. Subsequently, the
              BMECs were cultured at seeding of 2 × 10  cells/cm  in   cells were permeabilized using a cold cytoskeleton buffer
                                                        2
                                                4
            T175 tissue culture flasks and subcultured when cultures   (consisting of 3 mM MgCl , 300 mM sucrose, and 0.5%
                                                                                     2
            reached 80% confluence. The cells were maintained in   Triton X-100 in PBS) for 5 min. Then, the permeabilized
            complete growth media consisting of MCDB-131 media   cells  were  incubated  in  a  blocking  buffer  solution
            supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM   (comprising 5% FBS, 0.1% Tween-20, and 0.02% sodium
            L-glutamine,  and  1%  penicillin/streptomycin  (all  from   azide  in  PBS)  for  30  min  at  37°C.  To  detect F-actin,
            GIBCO, ThermoFisher, USA). Cells in passage 3 or 4 were   rhodamine-phalloidin (1:300) was added to the cells for 1 h.
            used for bioprinting experiments.                  Subsequently, the cells were treated with DAPI for 5 min to
                                                               counterstain the nucleus. The cells were then observed and
            2.6.2. Bioprinting                                 imaged using a laser scanning confocal microscope (Zeiss
            For bioprinting, the cells were mixed with 1× PBS solution   LSM 710 Inverted Confocal Microscope, Germany), and
            to prepare cell suspensions with a final concentration   z-stack images of the samples were captured.
            of 10 × 10  cells/mL or 20 × 10  cells/mL, depending on
                    6
                                      6
            whether hBM-MSCs  or BMEC were used. Those cell    3. Results and discussion
            concentrations were identified as the optimal density   This study highlights the benefits of using AM to produce
            in  terms of cell  viability and cell-cell  interaction after   customized 3D-printed nozzles for 3D bioprinting. Using
            bioprinting. Subsequently, the microfluidic pumps of the   resin-based 3D printing as a fabrication method for
            robotic arm bioprinter were loaded with the cell solution.   nozzles has several advantages, including precision and
            During the printing process, flow rates of 55  μL/min,   reproducibility. This new design for a 3D-printed nozzle
            15 μL/min, and 15 μL/min were maintained for peptide   addresses some of the limitations observed in previous
            solution, 5× PBS, and cells, respectively. Cuboid cell-  designs , such as the complexities of the assembly process
                                                                     [29]
            laden structures with 10  mm edges and 2.6  mm height   and the potential for backflow. Moreover, this nozzle design
            were printed. Following the printing process, the cell-  features a cell inlet that extrudes cells inside the nozzle,
            laden constructs were incubated in the CO  incubator for   allowing for the introduction of cells into the bioink after
                                               2
            5  min, after which complete growth media were added.   gelation and before the final extrusion.
            The printed cell-laden constructs were placed in standard
            conditions (37°C, 5% CO , and 95% relative humidity),   3.1. Design and fabrication of the nozzle
                                 2
            and the media were changed every 3 days.           This nozzle was designed with three inlets and one outlet. The
                                                               top two inlets are meant for the addition of the material to
            2.7. Assessment of cell-laden constructs
                                                               be mixed and gelled inside the nozzle, while the third inlet
            2.7.1. Cell viability assessment                   is used to extrude the cells just before the final extrusion of
            The viability of 3D bioprinted cells was assessed using the   the materials (Figure  2A). This allows for the addition of
            LIVE/DEAD Viability/Cytotoxicity Kit (ThermoFisher,   cells to the gel once gelation occurs within the nozzle mixing
            USA), in which calcein acetoxymethyl ester (Calcein-AM)   region. In addition, the nozzle is compatible with the Luer-
            is used to detect viable cells, and ethidium homodimer-I   Lok for ease of use despite the larger diameter of the Luer-Lok
            (EthD-I) is used to detect dead cells. The 3D cell-laden   compared to the desired interior diameter of our materials.
            bioprinted constructs were washed twice with Dulbecco’s   To maintain optimal flow, the nozzle channels are kept at a
            phosphate-buffered saline (D-PBS). Then, a staining   consistent 1 mm inner diameter throughout the entire nozzle.
            solution of 2 μM Calcein-AM and 4 μM of EthD-1 was   A backflow prevention feature was also incorporated to prevent
            added to the 3D cell-laden bioprinted constructs and   any backflow before the materials were mixed. The backflow
            incubated for 45 min in the CO  incubator. Subsequently,   issue was particularly prevalent in previous experiments we
                                      2
            the staining solution was removed, and the 3D-bioprinted   performed with other nozzles, where the different flow rates
            constructs were washed with 1× DPBS. The stained printed   between peptide and PBS led to a difference in pressure. As
            cell-laden constructs were imaged using an inverted   the peptide flowed toward the PBS inlet, premature mixing
            immunofluorescent  microscope  (Evos,  Invitrogen,  occurred before reaching the intended mixing region, leading
            ThermoFischer, USA). The assessment of cell viability was   to clog formation and disrupting gel continuity.
            performed at days 3, 7, and 10 for hBM-MSCs and at days   After designing using NX CAD software, the 3D model
            5 and 10 for BMECs.                                was extruded as an STL file. The file was then uploaded to a



            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2023)                         5                       https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.1786
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121