Page 21 - MSAM-3-3
P. 21

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                           Defects in additively fabricated Al6061



            stresses. 8,21,22  The literature indicates that addressing porosity   10 mm for the top surface area with a height of 10 mm.
            and cracking in Al6061 without altering the alloy chemistry   The process conditions were gathered from various studies
            are challenging. However, utilizing modified alloy chemistry   to identify optimal optical hatch spacing and comprehend
            presents limitations in L-PBF applications. Manufacturing   the influence of laser power, speed, and combined energy
            powders with grain refiners, such as zirconium and Yttria   density. Hence, there exists no precise experimental design
            Stabilized Zirconia, incur higher costs than unmodified   but rather a diverse array of data to explore the general
            alloy powders. Yoon  established a relationship between   correlations among laser power, speed, and hatch spacing
                            23
            aspect ratio and crack density in porous 3D structures   with defect levels, encompassing porosity and cracks.
            using experimental and optimization methods. Maamoun   Overall, they can be separated into two sets. Set 1 (Table 1)
                24
            et al.  investigated the impact of process parameters on the   encompassed 26 conditions characterized by varying
            microstructure and mechanical properties of L-PBF-printed   volumetric energy density levels, where  P is the laser
            samples, employing a substrate preheating temperature of   power, v  is the laser speed, h is the hatch spacing, and th is
                                                                      s
            200°C. They observed a decrease in the cracks area fraction   the layer thickness. The seven sets of laser power and scan
            in samples printed with an energy density of 52.6 J/mm .   velocity were random but covered a large range of linear
                                                         3
            However, Uddin et al.  have successfully produced crack-  energy  density  (P/v ).  Different  hatch  spacing,  ranging
                             20
                                                                               s
            free samples by reducing thermal stresses through high-  from 0.04 to 0.2 mm, were examined to varying volumetric
            temperature substrate heating at 500°C.            energy densities, ranging from E  = 29.24 J/mm  (P = 393
                                                                                                      3
                                                                                         min
                                                                                                             3
              In this study, we aim to minimize defects, particularly   W, v  = 2830 mm/s, h = 0.095 mm) to E max  = 159.39 J/mm
                                                                  s
            porosities and hot cracks, in Al6061 alloy fabricated using   (P = 263 W, v  = 550 mm/s, h = 0.06 mm). Set 2 (Table 2)
                                                                          s
            L-PBF technology. MATLAB modules were utilized to   comprised 25 conditions, employing a fixed hatch spacing
            optimize process parameters that reduce the occurrence of   (h = 0.100  mm) and a combination of laser power and
            both types of defects. In this study, hot cracks in Al6061   scan velocity. This set revolved around three nominal
            parts are deemed as failures due to their critical impact   conditions:  P  = 200 W,  v  = 100  mm/s;  P = 275 W,
                                                                                     s
            on engineering components. While Al6061 is used as a   v  = 4000 mm/s; and P = 450 W, v  = 1870 mm/s. Prior
                                                                s
                                                                                            s
                                                                          25
            model material, the proposed optimization strategy is   investigations  into solidification conditions and material
            adaptable to other materials processed through L-PBF. For   properties informed us of the selected conditions. Each set
            Al6061, the focus was on minimizing cracks to improve   has a replica to ensure the consistency of the observations.
            the effectiveness of subsequent post-build heat treatments,   If large discrepancies are observed between two identical
            such as HIP, which could potentially eliminate remaining   conditions, a third sample is added to justify the results. It
            defects. Hence, even under optimized process parameters   should be noted that the experimental plan did not follow
            identified in this research, printed parts are not intended   any known experimental design format. However, some
            for immediate end-use but serve as a foundation for   factor and level combinations were excluded from the full
            advancing toward defect-free production.           factorial design to eliminate the influence of extraneous
                                                               factors and level combinations. In addition,  within each
              With this study, we aim to gain a deeper understanding   group of conditions, parameters such as hatch spacing
            of internal defects and flaws occurring during L-PBF   under constant laser power and scan velocity, laser power
            of aluminum alloy Al6061 through experiments, data   under constant scan velocity and hatch spacing, and laser
            analysis, and process parameter optimization. For this   scan velocity under constant power and hatch spacing were
            purpose, an experimental design for room-temperature   varied, facilitating detailed investigations into individual
            printing of aluminum alloy Al6061 cubes was conducted,   factor contributions while minimizing non-linear
            focusing on factors such as laser power, scan velocity, and   correlation errors. However, this experimental design did
            hatch distance, while keeping other parameters, such as   not fully account for certain parameter interactions.
            layer thickness and scan strategy rotation, constant. The
            build cubes were then characterized for porosity and crack   All the cubes were printed using the Aconity MIDI
            density using 2D and 3D morphology methods at multiple   L-PBF printer (Germany), maintaining oxygen levels
            scales,  and the  total  defect density, porosity,  and  crack   below 100  ppm to prevent oxidation. The aluminum
            density were reported accordingly.                 alloy Al6061 powder utilized was commercially procured
                                                               from Carpenter Technology (USA), featuring particle
            2. Methods                                         sizes with a D  of 22 µm, a D  of 36 µm, and a D  of
                                                                                        50
                                                                           10
                                                                                                          90
                                                               54 µm. The powder layer thickness of 0.050 mm is fixed
            2.1. Experiments                                   for all samples during printing. A simple hatching strategy
            This study employed the L-PBF process to fabricate   was implemented, with the laser scanning back and forth
            aluminum alloy Al6061 test cubes, each measuring 10 ×   across the entire sample with layer-to-layer rotation of 67°

            Volume 3 Issue 3 (2024)                         3                              doi: 10.36922/msam.3652
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26