Page 58 - MSAM-4-1
P. 58

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                         Additive manufacturing of 316L-Cu alloys



               and SS-3Cu (329 ± 12 MPa). Similarly, a minor reduction   Consent for publication
               in hardness was measured in the Cu compositions
               (183 ± 9 and 186 ± 10 HV 0.2 for SS-3Cu and SS-5Cu,   Not applicable.
               respectively) compared to 316L (209 ± 12 HV 0.2).  Availability of data
            (c)  Cu addition demonstrated significant antibacterial
               efficacy. SS-3Cu and SS-5Cu effectively inhibited the   Data are available from the corresponding author on
               growth  of  S. aureus  and  P. aeruginosa  across all  time   reasonable request.
               points, with efficacy increasing proportionally with the   References
               Cu content. After being tested against S. aureus, the two
               compositions exhibited 18% and 12% bacterial viability   1.  Darouiche  RO.  Device‐associated  infections:
               at 72  h, respectively. More effectively, results for  P.   A  macroproblem that starts with microadherence.  Clin
               aeruginosa at 48 h indicate 6% and 3% bacterial viability.   Infect Dis. 2001;33(9):1567-1572.
               This highlights the potential of these alloys for use in      doi: 10.1086/323130
               biomedical environments, particularly in infection-  2.   iData Research. Orthopedic Trauma Devices Market Size,
               prone applications such as fracture management devices.  Share and COVID-19 Impact Analysis. United States.
              The findings suggest that 316L with Cu addition offers   2019-2025. iData Research; 2019. Available from: https://
            a promising balance between mechanical performance and   idataresearch.com/product/trauma-devices-market-united-
                                                                  states [Last accessed on 2024 Nov 25].
            antibacterial functionality, making it a viable material for
            advanced biomedical devices.                       3.   Ciliveri S and Bandyopadhyay A. Enhanced osteogenesis
                                                                  and bactericidal performance of additively manufactured
            Acknowledgments                                       MgO-and Cu-added CpTi for load-bearing implants. Int J
                                                                  Bioprinting. 2023;9(6):1167.
            The authors would like to acknowledge financial support      doi: 10.36922/ijb.1167
            from the National Science Foundation under Grant
            Number CMMI1934230 and the National Institute of   4.   Thakore RV, Greenberg SE, Shi H, et al. Surgical site infection
            Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the   in orthopedic trauma: A case-control study evaluating risk
            National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01   factors and cost. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2015;6(4):220-226.
            AR078241 (PI: Bandyopadhyay). The content is solely the      doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2015.04.004
            authors’ responsibility and does not necessarily represent   5.   Ciliveri S, Bandyopadhyay A. Additively manufactured SiO
                                                                                                             2
            the National Institutes of Health’s official views. The   and Cu-added Ti implants for synergistic enhancement of
            authors would also like to acknowledge experimental help   bone formation and antibacterial efficacy. ACS Appl Mater
            from Aruntapan Dash and Nathaniel Zuckschwerdt.       Interfaces. 2024;16(3):3106-3115.
                                                                  doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c14994
            Conflicts of interest
                                                               6.   Devasconcellos P, Bose S, Beyenal H, Bandyopadhyay A,
            Amit Bandyopadhyay is the Editorial Board Member of the   Zirkle LG. Antimicrobial particulate silver coatings on
            journal but did not in any way involve in the editorial and   stainless steel implants for fracture management. Mater Sci
            peer-review process conducted for this paper, directly or   Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2012;32(5):1112-1120.
            indirectly. The authors declare that they have no competing      doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2012.02.020
            interests.
                                                               7.   Xi T, Shahzad MB, Xu D, et al. Effect of copper addition on
            Authors’ contributions                                mechanical properties, corrosion resistance and antibacterial
                                                                  property of 316L stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol
            Conceptualization: Amit Bandyopadhyay                 Appl. 2017;71:1079-1085.
            Formal analysis: Michael B. Myers                     doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.022
            Funding acquisition: Amit Bandyopadhyay
            Investigation: Michael B. Myers                    8.   Vincent  M,  Duval  RE,  Hartemann  P,  Engels-Deutsch  M.
            Project administration: Amit Bandyopadhyay            Contact  killing and antimicrobial  properties  of copper.
            Supervision: Amit Bandyopadhyay                       J Appl Microbiol. 2018;124(5):1032-1046.
            Writing – original draft: Michael B. Myers            doi: 10.1111/jam.13681
            Writing – review & editing: Amit Bandyopadhyay     9.   Bandyopadhyay A, Mitra I, Ciliveri S,  et al. Additively
                                                                  manufactured Ti-Ta-Cu alloys for the next-generation load-
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            bearing implants. Int J Extreme Manuf. 2023;6(1):015503.
            Not applicable.                                       doi: 10.1088/2631-7990/ad07e7

            Volume 4 Issue 1 (2025)                         10                             doi: 10.36922/msam.7357
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63