Page 96 - MSAM-4-3
P. 96

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                           Heterostructures of A131 steel by DED



              In this study, A131 steel with heterostructures,   2.2. Fabrication process
            comprising alternating layers of coarse and fine grains, was   The AB A131 EH36 steel used in this study was fabricated
            successfully developed using a DED method that utilizes   using a DED AM machine (Figure  2A) equipped with
            the dendritic growth features of melt pools and thermal   a fiber laser (wavelength: 1070  nm; laser beam spot
            cycle behavior. An HT and commercial hot-rolled (HR)   diameter: 2.5  mm) under an argon atmosphere (1 bar
            A131 steel was also employed in this study as the control   pressure). The DED settings were: 1.23 kW laser power,
            group. The tensile strength of the AB A131 steel exhibited   0.5  mm layer thickness, 1200  mm/min moving speed,
            an exceptional combination of strength, approaching that   1.25 mm track space, and 722.2 mm/min powder feeding
            of Ti64 alloy, and plasticity within the range specified   speed with Gaussian distribution. The orthogonal strategy
            by the ductile ASTM A131 standard. To understand the   was used, where the moving direction rotated by 90° for
            formation mechanism of the heterostructure, multitype   each alternating layer alongside the building direction
            microstructure characterization and single-pass deposition   (Figure  2B). To distinguish the building direction, a 3D
            experiments were employed to elucidate the model of the   axis was constructed with normal direction (ND; parallel
            alternating layer of fine and coarse grains with crystal   to the laser deposition), transverse direction (TD), and
            misorientation. In addition, molecular dynamics (MD) was   rolling direction (RD).
            employed to reconstruct the model of the heterogeneous
            microstructure according to the observed microstructure.   In the HT  process,  the AB A131  EH36 steel  was
            The model was stretched in the same direction as the   quenched and subsequently tempered using a box-type
            experimental process to reveal the anisotropy of the tensile   furnace (MXQ1600-40, MICRO-X Ltd Co., China)
            behavior of the AB A131 steel. This innovative structural   (Figure 2C). The cleaned AB A131 EH36 bulk was heated
            design strategy presents a promising insight into crafting   (10 K/min) at 910°C for 0.5 h, followed by water quenching,
            traditional iron with a remarkable strength-plasticity   subsequent tempering at 500°C for 2 h (Figure 2D), and
            combination free from trade-off effects, with broader   air-cooling. To investigate the formation mechanism of
            implications for other conventional alloys in the industries.  the microstructure, single-pass deposition of A131 steel
                                                               was carried out using the DED method with the same
            2. Materials and methods                           parameters.
            2.1. Materials                                     2.3. Material characterization

            In this study, commercial gas-atomized mild steel powders   The starting raw materials and bulks were characterized
            (A131 EH36; particle size: 45 – 90  µm; Zhongyuan   using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JEOL
            Advanced  Materials  Technology Co.,  Ltd,  China)  were   JSM-5500LV; JEOL  Ltd.,  Japan)  equipped with  an
            utilized (Figure  1A).  The powder  was  approximately   energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS). The
            spherical, with a low-carbon equivalent value (0.3%)   microstructure of the bulks was also examined using an
            (Figure  1B;  Table S1). For comparison, commercial HR   SEM system (Apreo 2 SEM; Thermo Fisher Scientific,
            A131 steel bulk (ThyssenKrupp Material Services GmbH   United States of America [USA]) equipped with EDS and
            Co., Ltd., Germany) was used as the control  group. All   an electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) detector. The
            materials were used in the as-received state.      microstructure was also observed using a laser confocal

                         A                                 B


















            Figure 1. Steel powder morphology (A) and elemental composition (B)


            Volume 4 Issue 3 (2025)                         3                         doi: 10.36922/MSAM025220038
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101