Page 90 - OR-1-1
P. 90

allowed to solidify at 37°C for 30 min. The organoids were   calculate the ratio of live to dead cells. Results were
            then covered with cholangiocarcinoma organoid culture   expressed as cell viability (number of live cells/total
            medium (A211L11, Amoolo Biotech) and incubated at    cell number) and subjected to statistical analysis to
            37°C with 5% CO . To specifically support the proliferation   evaluate the sensitivity of organoids to the drugs. The
                          2
            of malignant cholangiocytes and sustain NOTCH pathway   PDOs inhibition ratio is calculated by subtracting the
            activation for maintaining a differentiation-supportive   cell viability of the drug group from that of the control
            tumor microenvironment in cholangiocarcinoma, we     group using 1-cell viability.
            supplemented the commercially available ICC organoid   (ii)  Cell viability assessment: During the exponential
            culture  medium  (Amoolo  Biotech)  with  recombinant   growth phase of the organoids (typically on the 4  –
                                                                                                          th
            FGF10 (50 ng/mL, Gibco, US) and Jagged1 (100 ng/mL,   5  day of culture), the PDOs were exposed to drugs
                                                                  th
            Gibco). The medium was refreshed every 4 days. MycoAlert   in a six-point 5-fold dilution series ranging from 50
            Mycoplasma Detection Kit (LT07-710, Lonza, Switzerland)   to 0.016  μmol/L for 72  h. After drug intervention,
            was used to regularly check for mycoplasma contamination   cell viability was also assessed using CellTiter-Glo
            in PDOs, and short tandem repeat analysis was performed   3D (Promega), and the data were analyzed using
            using a multiplex amplification kit (PowerPlex 21 system,   GraphPad Prism 9.0 (GraphPad Software, USA), with
            Promega, US) for identification.
                                                                 the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC ) values
                                                                                                      50
            2.4. PDOs-based drug sensitivity testing             calculated using non-linear regression (curve fitting).
            PDOs-based drug sensitivity testing was conducted as   2.5. Treatment and follow-up
            previously described. 11,12  In brief, the testing evaluated
            with four chemotherapy regimens: GC (gemcitabine   After  hospitalization,  ICC  patients  underwent
            and cisplatin in a 1:1 ratio), GEMOX (gemcitabine and   multidisciplinary team (MDT) consultations. If the
            oxaliplatin  in a  1:1  ratio),  capecitabine,  and S-1.  Since   MDT determined that the primary lesion was suitable
            capecitabine is a prodrug of fluorouracil (5-FU), it is   for R0  resection, the  patient  underwent  surgical
            metabolized into 5-FU in vitro to exert its antitumor effects.   resection. All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy
            Therefore, 5-FU was utilized as a substitute in the drug   postoperatively, including GC, GEMOX, capecitabine, or
            sensitivity  testing  in vitro.  The  active  components  of  S-1   S-1. 5,6,13,14  Follow-up time was measured from the start of
            that exert antitumor effects are the 5-FU prodrug tegafur   chemotherapy to the last follow-up. The primary endpoint
            and gimeracil. Similarly, the drug sensitivity testing in vitro   of this study is RFS.
            for S-1 used a combination of 5-FU and gimeracil (in a   Patients were prospectively monitored for recurrence
            5:2 ratio) as a substitute. All drug tests were performed in   with serum tumor markers and imaging studies, including
            triplicate, with each test including two technical replicates.   ultrasonography, computed tomography, and/or magnetic
            The evaluation approaches of PDOs-based drug sensitivity   resonance imaging. Recurrence was defined as a biopsy-
            included the following two methods:               proven recurrent lesion or radiological evidence with cross-
            (i)  Live/dead fluorescence staining: Once the PDOs were   sectional imaging and/or elevated levels of cancer antigen
                successfully established, they were treated with the   19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen. 15
                proposed four drug regimens (the tested concentrations
                of these drugs are shown in Table 1). Following 48 h of   2.6. Statistical analysis and machine learning
                incubation, the organoids were washed 3 times with
                phosphate-buffered saline to remove any unbound   The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate RFS for
                drugs.  Subsequently, live/dead  fluorescent  staining   patients in matched and unmatched group, and the log-rank
                was  performed using  a  Calcein-AM  and  Propidium   test was used for comparison. Univariate and multivariate
                Iodide Kit (P4864, Sigma-Aldrich, US). According   Cox regression analyses were performed to identify
                to the manufacturer’s instructions, Calcein-AM   independent predictive factors for RFS. Statistical analyses
                (2  μM) was added to the organoid culture medium   were conducted using R Studio version 4.4.2 (R Project for
                and incubated for 30 min to label live cells. Propidium   Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, www.r-project.org).
                iodide (4 μM) was then added and incubated for an   Machine learning models were developed using Python
                additional 10 min to label dead cells. After staining, the   version 4.10. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)
                automated microscope (BioTek. Lionheart FX, BioTek,   model was utilized to identify the most influential variables
                US) was used to image and analyze the captured   for predicting recurrence risk. The best hyperparameters
                images of different drug treatment groups to determine   are determined using the grid search strategy. Then, the
                the  spheroid  viability,  fluorescent  intensities,  and   importance of each feature was ranked using the shap
                morphology. ImageJ software (National Institutes   package. A  two-sided  p<0.05 was considered statistically
                of Health, USA) was utilized for image analysis to   significant.


            Volume 1 Issue 1 (2025)                         3                                 doi: 10.36922/or.8571
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95