Page 98 - OR-1-1
P. 98

PDOs-based drug resistance on RFS but also yield a  Author contributions
            practical,  clinician-friendly  tool  to  estimate  recurrence
            risk. For instance, in patients with a single tumor and no   Conceptualization: Feng Shen, Kui Wang
                                                              Formal analysis: Wei Zhai, Zhilin Sha, Tao Yuan, Zhishi
            tumor vascular invasion, the probability of 12-month PFS
            for patients with unmatched PDO-based drug test was   Yang
            approximately 28%, while for patients with matched PDT-  Investigation: Shichao Zhang, Hao Shen, Wenxin Wei
            based drug test, the probability increased to approximately   Methodology: Jin Lv, Zhihao Xie, Jinhuan Liu
                                                              Writing – original draft: Shichao Zhang, Hao Shen, Wenxin
            46%. By combining features such as vascular invasion,
            tumor multiplicity, and PDO-derived drug sensitivity,   Wei
            the nomogram offers a useful framework for tailoring   Writing – review & editing: Yong Xia, Chen Liu, Jun Li, Feng
            post-operative surveillance and adjuvant therapy to each   Shen, Kui Wang
            patient’s unique risk profile. Future work may extend these   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            computational approaches by incorporating genomic and
            immune profiles to optimize precision oncology strategies   This  study  received  ethical  approval  from  the  Ethics
            for ICC.                                          Committee of the Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery
                                                              Hospital and the Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital (approval
               However, this study still has several limitations.   no.: EHBHKY2021-K-029). All procedures involving
            First, although our cohort is comparatively large for an   human participants were carried out in accordance with
            ICC-related PDO study, the overall sample size remains   the Declaration of Helsinki.
            constrained, and our findings should be validated in larger,
            multicenter cohorts. Second, the observational study design   Consent for publication
            limits our ability to draw causal inferences regarding the
            direct benefit of PDO-guided regimens. Third, our current   Written informed consent was obtained from each
            approach focused on chemotherapy regimens commonly   participant.
            used in adjuvant settings; exploring newer modalities   Availability of data
            such as targeted therapeutics or immunotherapies was
            beyond the scope of this investigation. Finally, although   Data  are  available  from  the  corresponding  author  on
            our fluorescence-based drug sensitivity assessment   reasonable request.
            demonstrated good  concordance  with dose-response
            determinations, further validation in prospective trials with   References
            standardized cutoffs and assay conditions would bolster its   1.   Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA,
            clinical applicability.                              Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates
                                                                 of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185
            5. Conclusion                                        countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424.
            The  PDOs-based  drug  sensitivity  testing  can  serve  as      doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
            a promising tool to guide the adjuvant chemotherapy   2.   Brindley PJ, Bachini M, Ilyas SI, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma.
            decision and predict the prognosis of ICC patients with   Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):65.
            high recurrence risk after surgery.
                                                                 doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00300-2
            Acknowledgments                                   3.   Wang K, Zhang H, Xia Y, Liu J, Shen F. Surgical options for
                                                                 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr.
            None.                                                2017;6(2):79-90.
            Funding                                              doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2017.01.06

            This research was funded by the National Natural Science   4.   Moris D, Palta M, Kim C, Allen PJ, Morse MA,
            Foundation of China (82403243 to Hao Shen), Clinical   Lidsky ME. Advances in the treatment of intrahepatic
            Research Projects of Shanghai Shenkang Hospital      cholangiocarcinoma: An overview of the current and future
            Development Center (SHDC2024CRI062 to Wenxin Wei),   therapeutic landscape for clinicians.  CA Cancer J Clin.
                                                                 2023;73(2):198-222.
            and the Tengfei Project of Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval
            Medical University (TF2024XSJJ004 to Wenxin Wei) the      doi: 10.3322/caac.21759
            Clinical Research Cultivation.                    5.   Benson AB, D’Angelica MI, Abrams T,  et al. NCCN
                                                                         ®
                                                                 Guidelines  insights: Biliary tract cancers, Version 2.2023.
            Conflict of interest                                 J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023;21(7):694-704.
            The authors declare that they have no competing interests.     doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.0035


            Volume 1 Issue 1 (2025)                         11                                doi: 10.36922/or.8571
   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103