Page 55 - TD-2-3
P. 55

Tumor Discovery                                                  CE-SWI in desmoid fibromatosis assessment



            3.   Wu C, Amini-Nik S, Nadesan P,  et  al., 2010, Aggressive   during active observation: A retrospective cohort study. Ann
               fibromatosis (desmoid tumor) is derived from mesenchymal   Surg, 271: 748–755.
               progenitor cells. Cancer Res, 70(19): 7690–7698.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003073
               https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1656
                                                               15.  Valenzuela RF, Madewell JE, Kundra V, et al., 2021, Advanced
            4.   Li M, Cordon-Cardo C, Gerald WL, et al., 1996, Desmoid   imaging  in musculoskeletal oncology:  Moving away from
               fibromatosis is a clonal process. Hum Pathol, 27(9): 939–943.   RECIST and embracing advanced bone and soft tissue
               https://doi.org/10.1016/s0046-8177(96)90221-x      tumor imaging (ABASTI)-part II-novel functional imaging
                                                                  techniques. Semin Ultrasound CT MR, 42(2): 215–227.
            5.   Cadour F, Tradi F, Bartoli A, et al., 2023, Diffusion weighted
               imaging changes in extra-abdominal desmoid tumor after      https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2020.08.013
               cryotherapy. Ann Med, 55(1): 521–525.           16.  Haacke EM, Reichenbach JR, 2014, Susceptibility Weighted
                                                                  Imaging in MRI: Basic Concepts and Clinical Applications.
               https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2174589
                                                                  Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
            6.   Sheth PJ, Del Moral S, Wilky BA,  et al., 2016, Desmoid
               fibromatosis: MRI features of response to systemic therapy.   17.  Halefoglu AM, Yousem DM, 2018, Susceptibility weighted
               Skeletal Radiol, 45: 1365–1373.                    imaging: Clinical applications and future directions. World J
                                                                  Radiol, 10(4): 30–45.
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2439-y
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v10.i4.30
            7.   Shinagare AB, Ramaiya NH, Jagannathan JP,  et al., 2011,
               A to Z of desmoid tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 197(6):   18.  Haller S, Haacke EM, Thurnher MM,  et al., 2021,
               W1008–W1014.                                       Susceptibility-weighted imaging: Technical essentials and
                                                                  clinical neurologic applications. Radiology, 299(1): 3–26.
               https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.6657
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021203071
            8.   Sundaram M, McGuire MH, Schajowicz F, 1987, Soft-tissue
               masses: Histologic basis for decreased signal (short T2)   19.  Skalski KA, Kessler AT, Bhatt AA, 2018, Hemorrhagic and
               on T2-weighted MR images. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 148(6):   non-hemorrhagic causes of signal loss on susceptibility-
               1247–1250.                                         weighted imaging. Emerg Radiol, 25: 691–701.
               https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.148.6.1247             https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-018-1634-7
            9.   Gounder MM, Lefkowitz RA, Keohan ML,  et al., 2011,   20.  Eisenhauer  EA,  Therasse  P,  Bogaerts  J,  et al.,  2009,  New
               Activity of Sorafenib against desmoid tumor/deep   response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised
               fibromatosis. Clin Cancer Res, 17(12): 4082–4090.   RECIST guideline (version  1.1).  Eur  J Cancer, 45(2):
                                                                  228–247.
               https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-3322
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
            10.  Zanchetta E, Ciniselli C, Bardelli A, et al., 2021, Magnetic
               resonance imaging patterns of tumor response to   21.  Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA,  et al., 2000, New
               chemotherapy in desmoid‐type fibromatosis. Cancer Med,   guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid
               10(13): 4356–4365.                                 tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment
                                                                  of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States,
               https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3973                  National Cancer Institute of Canada.  J  Natl Cancer Inst,
            11.  Subhawong TK, Feister K, Sweet K,  et al., 2021, MRI   92(3): 205–216.
               volumetrics and image texture analysis in assessing      https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/92.3.205
               systemic  treatment  response  in  extra-abdominal  desmoid
               fibromatosis. Radiol Imaging Cancer, 3(4): e210016.   22.  Ko CC, Yeh LR, Kuo YT, et al., 2021, Imaging biomarkers for
                                                                  evaluating tumor response: RECIST and beyond. Biomarker
               https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.2021210016
                                                                  Res, 9(1): 52.
            12.  Zhou MY, Bui NQ, Charville GW,  et al., 2022, Current      https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-021-00306-8
               management and recent progress in desmoid tumors.
               Cancer Treat Res Commun, 31: 100562.            23.  Koh DM, Collins DJ, 2007, Diffusion-weighted MRI in the
                                                                  body: Applications and challenges in oncology. AJR Am J
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100562
                                                                  Roentgenol, 188(6): 1622–1635.
            13.  Otero S, Moskovic EC, Strauss DC, et al., 2015, Desmoid-     https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.1403
               type fibromatosis. Clin Radiol, 70(9): 1038–1045.
                                                               24.  Messiou C, Collins DJ, Morgan VA,  et al., 2014, Use of
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2015.04.015         apparent diffusion coefficient as a response biomarker in
            14.  Cassidy MR, Lefkowitz RA, Long N, et al., 2020, Association   bone: Effect of developing sclerosis on quantified values.
               of MRI T2 signal intensity with desmoid tumor progression   Skeletal Radiol, 43(2): 205–208.


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2023)                         8                          https://doi.org/10.36922/td.1414
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60