Page 86 - TD-4-3
P. 86

Tumor Discovery                                             Mg-28-A theoretical novel strategy in cancer therapy



              The absence of a need for bulky biochemical carriers   flexibility in dosing regimens allows for tailored treatment
            or nanoparticles further enhances the precision and safety   strategies based on tumor characteristics and patient-
            of Mg-28 therapy. As a naturally recognized ion, Mg-28   specific factors.
            is efficiently transported into cancer cells, ensuring direct
            intracellular  irradiation  without  the  complexities  and   4.6. Summary of key advantages
            potential drawbacks of exogenous delivery systems. This   The Mg-28 therapy presents a transformative and
            intrinsic targeting mechanism contributes to the high   biologically intelligent approach to cancer treatment,
            local dose within the tumor while minimizing systemic   offering several key advantages that distinguish it from
            toxicity.                                          conventional modalities.

            4.5. High local dose with minimal systemic toxicity  4.6.1. Dual mechanism of action for enhanced efficacy
            Simulation  results  using the MIRD code (Table 4)   By  simultaneously  targeting  multiple  critical
            demonstrate the potential of Mg-28 to deliver a high   Mg-dependent enzymes essential for cancer cell survival
            absorbed  dose to  tumors while maintaining minimal   and proliferation (DNA/RNA polymerases, hexokinase,
            systemic toxicity. The calculations, performed over 21  h   telomerase, and MMPs) and delivering highly localized
            (approximately one half-life of Mg-28), considered different   intracellular irradiation through its decay products (beta
            treatment regimens based on the number of Mg-28 ions   particles, Auger electrons, and recoil ions), Mg-28 offers
            internalized per cancer cell.                      a synergistic therapeutic effect. This can overcome drug
              Assuming a regimen of 400 Mg-28 ions/cell (regimen f),   resistance and achieve comprehensive tumor control—a
            a tumor absorbed dose of 415 Gy can be achieved across all   key advantage over single-target traditional inhibitors.
            tumor stages (T –T ). This dose is significantly above the   4.6.2. Intrinsic and highly selective tumor targeting
                         0
                            5
            generally accepted therapeutic threshold of around 50 Gy
            required for effective tumor control. Notably, the total   The therapy leverages the inherent metabolic vulnerability
            amount of Mg-28 needed to deliver this high local dose is   of cancer cells, characterized by their rapid proliferation
            remarkably small, with a maximum of only 6.2 ng required   and elevated demand for Mg. The quantified Mg-uptake
            for even the largest T  tumors. This high efficacy at the   coefficient demonstrates a significant preferential
                              5
            nanogram scale underscores the potency and economic   accumulation of Mg-28 within tumor tissues, eliminating
            viability of the Mg-28 approach.                   the need for complex and potentially toxic biochemical
              Conversely, the corresponding  whole-body  absorbed   carriers or nanoparticles. This natural targeting mechanism
            dose  for  the  same  regimen  (regimen  f)  remains   ensures a high concentration of the therapeutic agent
            consistently  low, with a maximum of 2.33  Gy observed   directly within the tumor microenvironment.
            for the smallest T  tumors, decreasing to the mGy range   4.6.3. Integrated self-theranostic capability
                          0
            for larger tumors (e.g., 59.2 mGy for T  and 5.92 mGy for
                                           2
            T ). This significant disparity between the high local tumor   Mg-28 uniquely combines diagnostic and therapeutic
             4
            dose and the low systemic exposure highlights the inherent   functionalities  within  a  single  radioisotope,  embodying
            safety advantage of Mg-28 therapy, minimizing potential   a self-theranostic approach. Its gamma emissions
            damage to healthy organs and tissues.              allow for early tumor detection using PET or SPECT
                                                               imaging—even at microscopic stages—while its continuous
              The enhanced Mg uptake by cancer cells, driven by   uptake facilitates real-time monitoring of treatment
            their elevated metabolic and replicative demands, further   response, enabling personalized and adaptive therapeutic
            contributes to this favorable dose distribution. This   strategies without the need for additional agents.
            biological preference ensures that Mg-28 is selectively
            concentrated within the tumor microenvironment,    4.6.4. Maximized local efficacy with minimized
            maximizing the therapeutic effect while sparing normal   systemic toxicity
            cells.                                             Simulation data indicate that Mg-28 can deliver cytotoxic
              The data in  Table 4 also illustrate the dose-response   radiation doses directly to tumor cells at the nanogram
            relationship with  varying  numbers  of Mg-28  ions/cell   scale, while the absorbed dose to surrounding healthy
            (regimens d, e, and f). Even with lower intracellular   tissues remains remarkably low. This favorable therapeutic
            concentrations  of Mg-28  (62  and 300  ions/cell),   index is attributed to the selective tumor uptake and the
            therapeutically relevant tumor doses (60.1 Gy and 312 Gy,   short-range, high-LET emissions of its decay products,
            respectively) can be achieved with correspondingly lower   which concentrate the destructive energy within the tumor
            systemic exposure and amounts of Mg-28 required. This   volume.


            Volume 4 Issue 3 (2025)                         78                           doi: 10.36922/TD025070010
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91