Page 85 - AIH-2-3

Artificial Intelligence in Health Organizational culture’s impact on burnout

productivity, while a toxic culture can breed dissatisfaction are critical in reducing burnout among non-patient-facing
and disengagement. By aligning culture with organizational staff. Aligning these efforts with the organization’s cultural
goals and employee needs, organizations can create a strengths can help create a resilient workforce and a more
supportive environment that enhances both individual and effective health system.
collective performance.
2.2. OC and burnout: Empirical evidence
2.1.1. Understanding of burnout and its dimensions Empirical studies have consistently highlighted the intricate
Burnout, as defined by Maslach and Leiter, is a psychological relationship between OC and burnout, emphasizing how
3
syndrome resulting from prolonged exposure to work- cultural factors can either exacerbate or alleviate stress.
related stressors. It manifests in three core dimensions: Schaufeli and Bakker, through their Job Demands-
7
(i) emotional exhaustion, which reflects feelings of Resources (JD-R) theory, illustrate that high job demands,
being overextended and depleted; (ii) depersonalization, when combined with insufficient resources, significantly
characterized by cynicism and detachment from work; contribute to burnout. Cultural elements such as managerial
and (iii) reduced personal accomplishment, where support, recognition, and resource allocation are critical
individuals perceive their contributions as ineffective or buffers against these stressors. Conversely, a lack of these
insufficient. Burnout is prevalent across various industries resources in an unsupportive culture amplifies burnout,
and significantly impacts both individual well-being manifesting in emotional exhaustion and disengagement.
and organizational outcomes. Schaufeli et al. highlight Their findings underscore the importance of cultivating a
4
that burnout diminishes job satisfaction and contributes culture that balances demand with available resources to
to turnover, absenteeism, and decreased productivity. enhance employee well-being and engagement.
Addressing these dimensions is essential to fostering
a sustainable workforce and mitigating the long-term 2.2.1. The role of work-life balance
consequences of workplace stress. Work-life balance, a key component of OC, has been
shown to significantly influence burnout levels. Maslach
2.1.2. Challenges in health systems and Leiter identified “areas of worklife,” including
8
In health systems, particularly in non-patient-facing roles, workload, control, reward, community, fairness, and
OC and burnout intersect to create unique challenges. While values, as cultural dimensions that impact burnout.
much attention has been directed toward clinical roles, Organizations that prioritize work-life balance create a
support staff and administrative teams face high workloads, supportive environment where employees can manage
role ambiguity, and limited recognition, all of which both professional and personal demands, thus reducing
contribute to burnout. These roles often operate behind the emotional exhaustion and fostering job satisfaction.
5
scenes, yet they are critical to the functionality and efficiency Conversely, cultures that promote excessive workloads and
of healthcare systems. Tawfik et al. emphasize the interplay neglect work-life integration are prone to higher burnout
5
between safety culture, work-life balance, and burnout, rates. This research suggests that embedding work-life
underscoring the need for organizational interventions balance into organizational practices is a strategic approach
that address these interconnected factors. Non-clinical to mitigate burnout and enhance workforce resilience.
staff often experience emotional exhaustion and reduced
accomplishment due to the high-pressure environment, yet 2.2.2. Managerial support and organizational justice
they receive less focus in research and policy initiatives. Managerial support and perceptions of organizational
justice are pivotal cultural factors influencing burnout.
2.1.3. Integration of culture and burnout mitigation Alarcon conducted a meta-analysis linking burnout to
A robust OC that prioritizes employee well-being can job demands, resources, and attitudes, revealing that
mitigate burnout, particularly in high-stress environments supportive leadership and fair treatment are critical in
such as health systems. Cameron and Quinn suggest buffering against burnout. When employees perceive
9
6
using the Competing Values Framework to diagnose and their managers as approachable and their contributions
transform OC, fostering a balance between flexibility, as fairly recognized, they are less likely to experience
stability, and a focus on both internal and external dynamics. depersonalization and reduced personal accomplishment.
By creating an inclusive culture that values the contributions Conversely, environments characterized by perceived
of all employees, organizations can address emotional injustices or a lack of support from leadership tend to have
exhaustion and promote a sense of accomplishment. higher burnout prevalence. These findings highlight the
Interventions such as clear communication of roles, necessity of leadership training and transparent policies to
recognition programs, and resources for work-life balance foster a culture of equity and support.

Volume 2 Issue 3 (2025) 79 doi: 10.36922/aih.5127