Page 64 - AJWEP-22-4
P. 64

Basu

                 Table A3. Comparison between control and cyclone‑affected farmers
                 Variables                              Control farmers      Cyclone‑affected     Mean          t
                                                           (n=400)           farmers (n=400)    difference
                                                        Mean       SE        Mean       SE
                 Sociodemographic variables
                  Age (years)                           48.73      0.49      48.95      0.64      −0.22       −0.27
                  Education (years of schooling)        8.96       0.15      6.24       0.19      2.72      11.10***
                  Household size (number of members)    4.71       0.06      4.97       0.09      −0.26      −2.20**
                  Earning member except household head   0.52      0.03      0.62       0.04      −0.09       −1.63
                  (number of members)
                  Household monthly income (BDT)       14459.5    413.25   15316.25    521.29    −856.75      −1.28
                  Household monthly expenditure (BDT)  12527.75   293.97   14437.88    344.46   −1910.12    −4.21***
                  Farming experience (years)            23.61      0.49      21.96      0.61      1.65       2.09**
                 Production-specific variables
                  Output (maund)                        49.84      2.48      35.71      2.01      14.13      4.42***
                  Land (acres)                          1.50       0.07      1.21       0.04      0.29       3.32***
                  Labor (man-days)                      14.18      0.68      15.72      0.69      −1.53       −1.57
                  Seed (kg)                             43.15      2.27      39.65      2.10      3.50        1.12
                  Chemical fertilizer (kg)              60.98      3.34      68.30      2.87      −7.31      −1.65*
                  Pesticide (kg)                        0.51       0.03      0.95       0.05      −0.43     −7.10***
                 Note: *t>1.64, **t>1.96, ***t>2.58.
                 Abbreviation: SE: Standard error.




                 Table A4. The impact of Cyclone Amphan on rice production (standardized coefficients of Cobb–Douglas
                 production function model)
                 Variables                     Model 1 (Khulna)          Model 2 (Satkhira)       Model 3 (Combined)
                 Land (acres)                   0.369*** (0.104)         0.832*** (0.0721)          0.472*** (0.0797)
                 Labor (man-days)              0.397*** (0.0977)         0.262*** (0.0633)          0.368*** (0.0602)
                 Seed (kg)                      0.0913 (0.0621)           0.00658 (0.115)            0.0398 (0.0390)
                 Chemical fertilizer (kg)      0.0915*** (0.0289)         0.0379 (0.0913)           0.112*** (0.0346)
                 Pesticide (kg)                 0.0150 (0.0136)           0.0142 (0.0139)            0.0113 (0.0129)
                 Cyclone (affected=1)          0.230*** (0.0340)         0.250*** (0.0309)          0.256*** (0.0282)
                 Constant                      0.0495** (0.0226)         0.218*** (0.0326)          0.128*** (0.0192)
                 Number of observations              400                       400                        800
                 R 2                                 0.917                    0.917                      0.900
                 Notes: Regression coefficients are expressed in standardized coefficients. Robust standard errors are reported in parentheses. The
                 dependent variable is rice output measured in maund (1 maund=40 kg). *p<0.10, **p<0.05, ***p<0.01.
















                Volume 22 Issue 4 (2025)                        56                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025100063
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69