Page 100 - AJWEP-22-5
P. 100
Fan, et al.
30. Chang SW, Chung IM. Water budget analysis extended drought and climate change conditions: The
considering surface water-groundwater interactions case of the Grombalia aquifer in Tunisia. Stoch Environ
in the exploitation of seasonally varying agricultural Res Risk Assess. 2025;39(1):129-154.
groundwater. Hydrology. 2021;8(2):60. doi: 10.1007/s00477-024-02854-5
doi: 10.3390/hydrology8020060 37. He Y, Ren M, Yang X, Chen Q, Huang Z, Kong X.
31. Boubguira S, Zouini D, Lamine S, et al. Suitability of Study of risk matrix for overflow-backpressure-based
surface water for irrigation in the Maffragh basin, North- deepwater managed pressure drilling. Chem Technol
East of Algeria. J Water Land Dev. 2021;48:94-98. Fuels Oils. 2023;59(2):305-310.
doi: 10.24425/jwld.2021.136151 doi: 10.1007/s10553-023-01530-8
32. Grinevskiy SO, Sporyshev VS, Samartsev VN. A model 38. Mavhungu TC, Mankga LT. The impact of sewage water
analysis of the effect of climate changes on the balance overflow (SWO): An analysis of Zandspruit river in
structure of operational reserves of riverside groundwater Cosmo City, Johannesburg, South Africa. Asian J Water
deposits. Moscow Univ Geol Bull. 2019;74(5):473-482. Environ Pollut. 2024;21(4):63-71.
doi: 10.3103/S0145875219050065 doi: 10.3233/AJW240047
33. Aldas LVP, Zambrano SNG, Arcos LPA, Martínez DR, 39. Singh T, Pal H. Assessment of seven conventional natural
Fuentes EM. Study of the Influence of Anthropogenic drinking water sources in the periphery of Chamba Town
Sources on the Water Quality of the Ambato River, of Himachal Pradesh in India. Asian J Water Environ
Tungurahua - Ecuador. A Growing Environmental Pollut. 2023;20:97-103.
Problem. In: Sustainability, Energy and City. CSECity doi: 10.3233/AJW230013
2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Cham: 40. Yang X, Zhu M, Luo D, Zhoubing YE, Jiang J.
Springer; 2022. Dynamic analysis of meteorological drought and its
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-94262-5_10 recovery in the Yellow River Basin. Water Resour Prot.
34. Telyma SV, Voloshkina OS, Bereznytska YO, 2025;41(3):127-133.
Efimenko VM. Modeling of the riverside groundwater doi: 10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2025.03.015
intakes exploitation taking into account of the stream flow 41. Nilda I, Luhring-González, Ortiz-Zayas JR, Barreto M.
changes. Geoinform Theor Appl Aspects. 2020;2020:1-5. Hydrological assessment for watershed health in a
doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.2020geo084 headwater Sub-basin of the Rio Grande de Arecibo,
35. Park M. A study on the development and application of Puerto Rico. J Geosci Environ Prot. 2023;11(12):58-80.
spatial-TDR sensor for the management of groundwater doi: 10.4236/gep.2023.1112004
at riverside. Sustainability. 2018;10(4):1213. 42. Herrera PA, Marazuela MA, Hofmann T. Parameter
doi: 10.3390/su10041213 estimation and uncertainty analysis in hydrological
36. Jarray H, Mellah T, D’Oria M, et al. Assessing pollution modeling. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water. 2021;9(3):e1569
and water resources suitability for multiple uses under doi: 10.1002/wat2.1569
Volume 22 Issue 5 (2025) 94 doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025260208

