Page 204 - AJWEP-22-6
P. 204

Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution. Vol. 22, No. 6 (2025), pp. 198-209.
                doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025320249




                ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

                  Stage-wise performance evaluation of the Kalobe waste
                    stabilization ponds in Mbeya, Tanzania: Efficiency in

                                    organic load and nutrient removal




                            Eline Gerson    1,2  , Gislar E. Kifanyi , Omary R. Shegwando            1,2  ,
                                                                      1
                                                     and Fredrick Ojija *
                                                                            3
                           1 Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, Mbeya University of
                                                 Science and Technology, Mbeya, Tanzania
                             2 Department of Technical, Mbeya Water Supply and Sanitation Authority, Mbeya, Tanzania
                           3 Department of Earth Sciences, College of Science and Technical Education, Mbeya University of
                                                 Science and Technology, Mbeya, Tanzania
                                       *Corresponding author: Fredrick Ojija (fredrick.ojija@must.ac.tz)


                  Received: August 9, 2025; Revised: August 29, 2025; Accepted: September 3, 2025; Published online: October 3, 2025




                     Abstract:  Globally, waste stabilization  ponds  (WSPs)  in warm climates  have demonstrated high treatment
                     efficiencies for organic matter and suspended solids. This study evaluates the stage-wise performance and overall
                     treatment efficiency of the Kalobe WSPs in Mbeya city, Tanzania, which treat approximately 15,000–18,000 m /day
                                                                                                            3
                     of mixed domestic and industrial wastewater, compared with a design capacity of 28,800 m /day. The system
                                                                                                 3
                     comprises  anaerobic,  facultative,  and maturation  ponds operating  in  parallel.  Field  sampling  and  laboratory
                     analysis were conducted to determine pollutant  concentrations across each treatment  stage, focusing on key
                     parameters including biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), 5-day, chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended
                     solids (TSSs), ammonia, nitrite, and total dissolved solids (TDS). Results revealed that while the WSP system
                     demonstrated high removal efficiencies for organic and solid pollutants, achieving reductions of 58.1% for BOD,
                     87.3% for COD, and 87.2% for TSS, its performance in nutrient and dissolved solids removal remained limited.
                     Ammonia was moderately reduced (80.5%), whereas nitrite and TDS exhibited low removal efficiencies of 17.4%
                     and 13.7%, respectively. The final effluent BOD (39 mg/L) and COD (78 mg/L) exceeded Tanzania’s national
                     discharge standards, indicating partial non-compliance. The study also found that flow variations, particularly from
                     industrial contributors such as Pepsi and Tanzania Breweries Limited, introduced intermittent hydraulic shocks,
                     which may impair treatment consistency. The findings highlight the need for system upgrades, enhanced industrial
                     pre-treatment enforcement, and the integration of post-treatment units to improve nutrient polishing. Overall, while
                     Kalobe WSPs remain a cost-effective solution, strategic interventions are necessary to ensure sustained regulatory
                     compliance and environmental protection.

                     Keywords: Waste stabilization ponds; Treatment efficiency; Organic load reduction; Nutrient removal; Anaerobic
                     ponds; Facultative ponds; Maturation ponds










                Volume 22 Issue 6 (2025)                       198                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025320249
   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209