Page 96 - AJWEP-22-6
P. 96

Li, et al.

                desulfurization  owing  to  its  three-dimensional   aluminized MCM-41 and SBA-15 grafted with Ce ,
                                                                                                                  3+ 22
                interconnected  supercage structure (pore diameter   Ni-Ce/alumina-silica  (Al O -SiO ),   Ce-Fe/activated
                                                                                                    23
                                                                                                  2
                                                                                           2
                                                                                             3
                ~1.3 nm) and exceptionally high specific surface area   carbon (AC) composites.   A  few  studies  have  also
                                                                                           24
                (>700 m /g). Its framework is enriched with abundant   reported  on the  use of ruthenium  complexes  for the
                        2
                Brønsted  and  Lewis  acid  sites,  facilitating  acid-base   extraction of dibenzothiophene (DBT) from petroleum
                interactions  with  sulfur-containing  molecules  and   feedstocks.  For  instance,  the  binuclear  ruthenium
                enabling  efficient  removal  of  bulky  organosulfur   complex, [CpRu(CO) (µ -η (S): η -DBT)RuCp*][PF ]
                                                                                                  6
                                                                                             1
                                                                                                                   6 2
                                                                                       2
                                                                                          2
                compounds such as thiophene, benzothiophene,  and   was used for desulfurization of DBT, in which one Ru
                dibenzothiophene.  Furthermore,  Y-zeolite  exhibits   is η (S)-coordinated to DBT whereas the other Ru is
                                                                        1
                outstanding  thermal  stability  and highly tunable   η (S)-coordinated  to  the  same  DBT  molecule. 25,26  As
                                                                      6
                structural properties, which can be optimized through ion   noted, the strength of the direct S–M σ bond is mainly
                exchange, steam treatment, and chemical modifications.  dependent on the metal ion’s charge and ionic radius.
                  Nevertheless, pristine Y-zeolite suffers from inherent   Specific metal ions with strong ionic polarities are able
                limitations  in practical  applications.  Its adsorption   to enhance direct S–M interaction and further improve
                primarily relies on physical interactions and weak acid-  adsorption selectivity for sulfur compounds.
                base affinities, which are inadequate for capturing low-  Traditionally, the liquid phase ion-exchange method
                polarity, refractory sulfur species. Moreover, competitive   has  been  used  to  prepare  the  metal  ion-modified
                adsorption of non-sulfur aromatic  hydrocarbons     Y-zeolites, 14,15,27,28  while only a few studies have explored
                in complex fuel matrices  leads to poor selectivity,   the solid state reaction  method. 29,30  In this study, the
                hindering the achievement  of deep desulfurization  at   solid-state reaction method was used to develop high-
                ultra-low sulfur levels (<10 ppm). In addition, repeated   selectivity S–M interaction adsorbents. A series of metal
                adsorption-regeneration  cycles tend to degrade  the   ions with high charge number and lower ionic radius—
                framework’s  acidity  and  pore  architecture,  ultimately   namely, ruthenium(III)  (Ru ),  bismuth(III)  (Bi ),
                                                                                               3+
                                                                                                                  3+
                compromising long-term operational stability.       zirconium(IV) (Zr ), and antimony (III) (Sb )—were
                                                                                    4+
                                                                                                            3+
                  Incorporating metal  ions into adsorbents has been   selected as active sites for the modification of Y-zeolite.
                shown to enhance their performance, as the introduced   The desulfurization  performance  of these MY-zeolite
                metal species can act as active sites for the adsorption of   adsorbents  was  evaluated  using  batch  adsorption  of
                sulfur-containing compounds. Most studies have focused   thiophene  (TP) from a model gasoline  containing  20
                on  reactive  adsorption  mechanisms,  which  can  be   ppmw  sulfur.  We  investigated  the  effect  of  various
                broadly categorized into two types: (i) π-complexation-  parameters,  such as the metal  type, metal  ion form,
                based adsorbents, such as metal-ion-exchanged Y-type   chemical state, and loading amount, on the TP removal
                zeolites (denoted as MY-zeolites, where M represents   efficiency.
                metal  ions  including  copper(I)  (Cu⁺),  silver(I)  (Ag⁺),
                nickel(II)  (Ni²⁺),  zinc(II)  (Zn²⁺),  and  palladium(II)   2. Materials and methods
                (Pd²⁺)); and (ii) adsorbents that rely on direct sulfur–metal
                (S–M) interactions, where the Y-type zeolite is modified   2.1. Preparation of MY-zeolite (MY-1 and RuY-X
                with high-charge metal ions such as cerium(IV) (Ce⁴⁺)   series) adsorbents
                and lanthanum(III) (La³⁺). 14,15  Compared to adsorbents   Metal-ion-modified  Y-type  zeolite  adsorbents  were
                based on  π-complexation, those utilizing  direct S–M   prepared  using  the  solid-state  ion  exchange  method.
                interactions  generally  demonstrate  higher  selectivity   One gram of ammonium-exchanged Y-zeolite (NH₄Y-
                for  sulfur compounds,  particularly  in  the  presence   zeolite) was thoroughly mixed and ground for 1 h with
                of  competing  aromatic  hydrocarbons.  Recently,  new   a stoichiometric amount of ruthenium(III) chloride
                zeolite  nanofiber  bundle  catalysts  developed  by Tang   hydrate (RuCl₃·xH₂O), antimony(III) chloride (SbCl₃),
                et al. demonstrated sulfur reduction to below 10 ppmw   zirconyl  chloride  octahydrate  (ZrOCl₂·8H₂O),  or
                in diesel using the HDS process.  This has underscored   bismuth(III)  nitrate  pentahydrate  (Bi(NO₃)₃·5H₂O),
                                            16
                the  importance  of  adsorption  selectivity  over  sulfur   with an initial molar ratio of metal ion to ammonium ion
                uptake in achieving the ultra-low sulfur fuel standard.   (M/NH₄⁺) equal to 1. The mixtures were subsequently
                A lot of high-selectivity sulfur adsorbents incorporating   calcined  in  air  at  500°C for 2  h.  These  resulting
                Ce-modified microporous materials have been reported,   adsorbents were denoted as MY-1 and RuY-X, where
                such as CeY, 17,18   Ce-modified  mesoporous  structure   M represents the metal ion (Ru³⁺, Sb³⁺, Zr⁴⁺, or Bi³⁺),
                Y-zeolite, 19,20   Ce-doped  MCM-41  frameworks,    and X indicates the initial molar ratio of ruthenium(III)
                                                               21


                Volume 22 Issue 6 (2025)                        90                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025250204
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101