Page 100 - AJWEP-v22i2
P. 100

Sao, et al.

                 Table 7. Carcinogenic risk assessment (arsenic exposure) for the dry and rainy seasons in Prek Te
                 Season             Mean concentration (µg/L)       Men              Women              Children
                                                              LADD      LCR      LADD      LCR      LADD      LCR
                 Dry Season (n=21)           1.235            1.0×10 −2  1.5×10 −2  1.2×10 −2  1.8×10 −2  1.8×10 −2  2.6×10 −2
                 Rainy Season (n=21)         8.531            6.9×10 −2  1×10 −1  8.1×10 −2  1.2×10 −1  1.2×10 −1  1.8×10 −1
                 Abbreviations: As: Arsenic; LADD: Lifetime average daily dose; LCR: Lifetime cancer risk.

                3.3.2. Carcinogenic risk assessment                 with the WHO guidelines and CDWQS, except for As
                The carcinogenic risks associated with drinking water   and Ni.
                during  the  rainy  and  dry seasons are  presented  in   Arsenic  concentrations  reached  a  maximum  of
                Table 7. The LCR of As for men, women, and children   58.1  µg/L, exceeding both the CDWQS limits  of
                in the dry season was calculated as 1.5 × 10 , 1.8 × 10 ,   50 µg/L and the WHO guideline of 10 µg/L. Additional
                                                               −2
                                                     −2
                and 2.6 × 10 , respectively. These values indicate that   recorded values of 21.9  µg/L and 10.8  µg/L also
                           −2
                for every 10,000 individuals exposed to As in drinking   surpassed the WHO guideline. Ni concentrations were
                water over their lifetime, approximately 150, 180, and   found at a maximum of 45.8 µg/L, with other recorded
                260 cases of cancer may develop in men, women, and   values of 25.4 µg/L, 24.4 µg/L, and 23.8 µg/L. These
                children, respectively.                             concentrations exceeded the CDWQS limit of 20 µg/L
                  In the rainy season, the LCR of As increased to 1 × 10 ,   but remained  below the  WHO guideline  of 70  µg/L.
                                                               −1
                1.2 × 10 , and 1.8 × 10  for men, women, and children,   Contaminant  concentrations  were generally  lower in
                       −1
                                    −1
                respectively.  These values indicate that for every 100   the dry season compared to the rainy season, indicating
                exposed individuals, approximately 10, 12, and 18 cases   better water quality during the dry season.
                of  cancer  could  be  expected  due  to  As  contamination   Statistical  analysis  revealed  a  significant  seasonal
                in drinking water.  The United States Environmental   difference  (p<0.05)  in  all  assessed  water  quality
                Protection  Agency does not classify several metals—  parameters, including pH, DO, EC, TDS, As, Cu, Cr,
                including Cu, Cr, Cd, Pb, Zn, and Ni—as carcinogenic   Cd, Pb, Zn, and Ni. The health risk assessment indicated
                through oral exposure. However, LCR values are essential   that residents along Prek Te are exposed to chemical
                for assessing As-related risks among different demographic   contaminants  primarily  through the drinking water
                groups. Higher LCR values indicate an increased risk of   pathway. HQ and HI values were higher in children than
                developing cancer from As exposure, highlighting the need   in women and men, indicating that children are more
                for effective mitigation strategies to minimize exposure,   susceptible to non-carcinogenic risks from waterborne
                especially among vulnerable populations such as children.  contaminants. Furthermore, LCR analysis showed that
                  Inorganic  arsenic  is one of the  most prevalent   children face a higher risk of As-related health effects
                chemical contaminants in drinking water worldwide and   compared to adults. These findings highlight the urgent
                is a confirmed human carcinogen.  Prolonged exposure   need for a regular water quality monitoring program.
                                             35
                to low concentrations  of heavy metals may lead to   In addition, the implementation of appropriate drinking
                the development of various cancers years after initial   water treatment methods, particularly for As removal, is
                exposure.  Contaminated  drinking  water containing   critical to ensuring safe drinking water for residents in
                        36
                heavy metals (Pb, Cr, Cd, and Ni) has been associated   the Prek Te area.
                with an increased risk of cancer in humans.  Given that
                                                      37
                As concentrations in drinking water exceeded acceptable   Acknowledgments
                limits, particularly for children, urgent interventions are
                necessary to mitigate public health risks. 38       The authors would like to extend our heartfelt gratitude
                                                                    to the Soil Environmental  Laboratory, Department
                4. Conclusion                                       of Environment  and Energy Engineering  (DEEE),
                                                                    Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST)
                This study investigated the seasonal variations in surface   for generously providing the facilities and instrument
                water quality and the associated human health risks due   necessary for conducting  the water samples analysis.
                to chemical contamination  from upstream artisanal   Their support and access to advanced analytical
                mining activities along Prek Te. The analytical results   instruments are essential in ensuring the accuracy and
                revealed that most water quality parameters complied   reliability of our results.



                Volume 22 Issue 2 (2025)                        94                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025060037
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105