Page 177 - AJWEP-v22i2
P. 177

Topographic and watershed analysis

                                                                    Modeling System), and cross-referencing  with
                                                                    topographic maps. These procedures demonstrated that
                                                                    ArcGIS Pro is the most suitable option for this study as
                                                                    it produces reliable and accurate hydrological outputs.

                                                                    3.3. Methods
                                                                    3.3.1. Sentinel-1 and -2 images pre-processing
                                                                    The Sentinel-1 images were pre-processed using
                                                                    the Sentinel  Application  Platform (SNAP)  software
                                                                    (version 11.0.0). The data can be utilized for generating
                                                                    DEMs through a series of pre-processing steps,
                                                                    including radiometric calibration to convert raw digital
                                                                    data into backscatter coefficients that reflect the physical
                    Figure 1. The study area (Haditha Lake) 28,29   properties of the surface, thermal noise removal to
                                                                    reduce or eliminate noise from the satellite’s electronics,
                                                                    which can affect data quality, and terrain correction to
                                                                    correct distortions caused by terrain (such as mountains
                                                                    or valleys) that affect the angle of incidence of radar
                                                                    waves,  as shown in Figure 3.
                                                                          32
                                                                       The DEM was then used to conduct the topographic
                                                                    and watershed hydrologic analyses.  The Sentinel-2
                                                                    images  were pre-processed using SNAP software,
                                                                    geometrically  corrected  to ensure accurate  locations,
                                                                    and then rescaled to 10 m resolution to improve analysis
                                                                    and reduce unnecessary data. Spectral bands (2, 3, 4,
                                                                    and 8) are selected for vegetation studies, and the data
                                                                    are exported to GeoTiff format for LULC classification,
                Figure 2. The Sentinel-1A (S1A_IW_GRDH) image       as shown in Figure 4.
                of the study area. Scale bar: (0.11 miles)             To manage  satellite  data  uncertainties,  Sentinel-1
                                                                    SAR  data guaranteed all-weather  DEM  production,
                interferometry processing of Sentinel-1 data. Due to its   whereas cloud-masked Sentinel-2 photos were
                synthetic aperture radar (SAR) capabilities, Sentinel-1   utilized for LULC classification to reduce uncertainty.
                is particularly well-suited for producing high-resolution   Radiometric/geometric adjustments in SNAP software
                DEMs, which are essential for precise topographic and   decreased distortions, whereas interferometric methods
                hydrological analysis. The Sentinel-1 can collect data   (in SAR) increased terrain accuracy. Despite atmospheric
                in all weather, including  cloud cover and sunshine,   or sensor restrictions, consistent hydrological analysis
                unlike optical  sensors like Sentinel-2  or Landsat 8,   was ensured by resampling the data to a resolution of
                guaranteeing constant, dependable imagery throughout   10 m.
                time.  This is very useful for areas where weather or
                atmospheric circumstances could ordinarily make data   3.3.2. Topographic analysis
                collecting  difficult. ArcGIS  Pro  was  selected  for  this   GIS techniques  were used to analyze  the terrain  and
                study because of its advanced hydrological  modeling   identify erosion areas in the river basin, as in previous
                capabilities,  excellent  DEM  processing  accuracy,   studies. 33,34  The slope, direction, curvature, and shading
                and smooth integration  with RS data  (Sentinel-1  &   maps were created using ArcGIS Pro tools. These tools
                Sentinel-2). ArcGIS  Pro  offers  stronger  spatial  tools,   were  used  to  analyze  terrain  features  and  their  effect
                improved  raster-based  analysis,  and  more  accurate   on water flow. Contour lines were created to visualize
                watershed delineation than Quantum GIS and System   elevation  changes  and  identify  potential  water  flow
                for Automated Geoscientific Analyses.               paths, as shown in  Figure  5.  Terrain  analysis  tools
                  The hydrological findings were verified using field   play an important role in understanding and analyzing
                data verification, comparisons with other GIS models   DEMs. The slope tool calculates the degree of slope,
                (e.g., Hydrologic Engineering Center–Hydrologic     which is essential for erosion, drainage, and structural



                Volume 22 Issue 2 (2025)                       171                                 doi: 10.36922/ajwep.8499
   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182