Page 119 - AJWEP-v22i3
P. 119

Farming technologies and food yields in Pakistan

                 Table 5. ARDL estimates
                                                       Dependent variable: CCY
                 Variables             Coefficient           Standard error           t‑Statistic         Probability
                 ∆(AGRI)                 −0.014                  0.002                  −5.801               0.000
                 ∆(TEMP)                −180.128                198.039                 −0.909               0.367
                 ∆(DAML)                3971.774               1568.494                 2.532                0.014
                 ∆(FAR)                  24.330                 11.244                  2.163                0.034
                 ∆(CH )                  50.567                 23.435                  2.145                0.045
                     4
                 ∆(N O)                  48.356                 37.546                  2.457                0.053
                    2
                 ∆(PAT)                  0.048                   0.012                  3.840                0.000
                 CointEq(−1)             −0.362                  0.148                  −2.443               0.017
                                                         Long run coefficients
                 Variables             Coefficient           Standard error           t‑Statistic         Probability
                 AGRI                    −0.028                  0.010                  2.801                0.035
                 TEMP                   −497.536                499.057                 −0.996               0.323
                 DAML                   3163.687               2299.048                 1.376                0.174
                 FAR                     67.203                 26.846                  2.5031               0.015
                 CH 4                    58.562                 28.096                  2.573                0.013
                 N O                     56.203                 30.326                  2.952                0.016
                  2
                 PAT                     0.147                   0.052                  2.826                0.035
                 Constant              21865.514               10810.553                2.022                0.048
                 Source: Author’s estimate.
                 Abbreviations: AGRI: Agriculture value-added; CH : Methane emissions; CCY: Cereal crop yield; DAML: Data analytics and machine
                                                      4
                 learning; FAR: Farmer’s adoption rate; N O: Nitrous oxide emissions; PAT: Precision agriculture technology; TEMP: Temperature.
                                              2
                importance  of policy frameworks, extension services,   emissions are indicative of more nutrient-rich soil, which
                and institutional  capacity  in technology transmission   is crucial for increasing agricultural production.  This
                                                                                                               60
                and farmer training. 57                             relationship  emphasizes  the  necessity  for  data-driven
                  The ARDL  results  indicate  a  positive  relationship   solutions and precision agriculture to strike a balance
                between CH  and N O emissions and CCYs in the short   between crop production and greenhouse gas emissions.
                           4
                                 2
                and long run.  This shows that intensive  agricultural   Precise agriculture technology can aid in the rapid
                practices increase emissions and food output. However,   enhancement of CCYs over time, boosting agricultural
                this  association  highlights  an  essential  cost-benefit   efficiency  and  sustainability.  Data  analytics,  GPS-
                analysis: agricultural intensification improves yields and   guided  devices, and  remote  sensing provide  accurate
                greenhouse gas emissions, threatening  environmental   resource  management,  site-specific  interventions,  and
                sustainability. These findings demonstrate the necessity   real-time  monitoring.   These  technologies  provide
                                                                                        61
                to include precision farming technology that maximizes   personalized  input  applications  for  crop  and  soil
                input  use  and  reduces  environmental  impacts  into   conditions, improving yields with minimal waste and
                productivity  gains  to  reduce  emissions.  Further, the   environmental  impact.  It has been demonstrated  that
                findings  reveal  that  productivity  advantages  and   long-term output and resilience can be increased through
                environmental  externalities  are  traded  off  since  more   the implementation  of strategies  informed by data
                emissions are generated in exchange for higher yields,   collected from multiple growing seasons.  In addition,
                                                                                                         30
                which are not achieved in a more sustainable manner.   precision  agriculture  may  strengthen  agricultural
                Conversely, CH  and N O emissions may enhance plant   systems, protect biodiversity, and improve soil health,
                                    2
                              4
                growth and  soil  fertility  in  some  situations.  These   enabling sustainability in agriculture.
                                                         58
                gases enhance plant growth and output and are usually   Table  6  shows  that  diagnostic  testing  confirmed
                produced by microbial  activities in the soil.  These   the ARDL model’s robustness. The Breusch–Godfrey
                                                         59

                Volume 22 Issue 3 (2025)                       113                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025130096
   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124