Page 116 - AJWEP-v22i3
P. 116

Nabi, et al.

                agriculture,  precision  farming,  CH ,  N O emissions,   Where CCY = Cereal crop yield; PAT = Precision
                                                    2
                                                4
                and food crop yields in Pakistan. The ARDL framework   agriculture  technology;  TEMP  = Temperature;
                integrates short- and long-term influences into a single   AGRI =  Agriculture  value-added;  CH  = Methane
                                                                                                         4
                estimating structure, even when variables have varied   emissions; N O = Nitrous oxide emissions; DAML =
                                                                                2
                integration orders (I(0) and I(1)).  Data  irregularities   Data analytics and machine learning; FAR = Farmer’s
                and structural failures are common in underdeveloped   adoption  rate;  ∆,  t,  and  ƹ  denote  difference  operator,
                countries like Pakistan; therefore, this flexibility helps   time, and error term, respectively.
                to  utilize  this  statistical  technique.  It  can  also  capture   The ARDL  bounds testing  approach  developed  by
                complicated trade-offs between agricultural innovation   Pesaran  et al.  is a robust method for co-integration
                                                                                 47
                and environmental degradation since the model definition   analysis. Superior to Johansen and Engle–Granger
                includes emissions-technology adoption interaction   tests, ARDL permits the inclusion of deterministic and
                variables. This method reinforces empirical results and   non-stationary variables along with their lagged values
                provides a framework for policymakers to balance fast   in the model.  Researchers  ascertain  co-integration  by
                technological growth with environmental damage.     employing least squares regression to assess the ARDL
                                                                    model and comparing the F-statistic with critical values.
                3.1. Econometric framework                          ARDL’s  equations  incorporate  short-  and  long-term
                The study employed  the Phillips–Perron  (PP) and   dynamics  to  depict  both  immediate  and  equilibrium
                Augmented  Dickey–Fuller  (ADF) unit  root tests  to   interactions between variables, making it the preferred
                determine  stationary  time-series  data.  These tests   method for econometric analysis, especially in complex
                determine if a time series is stationary, a trait that could   economic systems. Equation IX shows the ARDL model
                impact  data  predictability. The ADF test seeks a unit   specification with error correction term:
                root to indicate non-stationarity. Like the ADF, the PP
                test finds unit roots by carefully examining the lagged             p                 q
                variable’s  coefficient,  but  it  detects  heteroskedasticity   ln(CCY ) =  t  α  0 ∑  ϕ +  i ∆  ln(CCY ) t i−  θ +  i ∆  ln(PAT ) t i− ∑
                better.  Time-series data used in an economic model              r  i= 1           t  i= 0
                must fulfill both stationarity and consistency conditions.    +  ∑  θ  i  ln(TEMP ) t i−  +  φ ∆  i ∆  ln (n AGRI ) t i− ∑
                Equations I to VIII show the estimated ADF unit root            i= 0               i= 0
                test equations:                                                  v                w
                                                                              +   φ  i  ln(CH 4) t i − ∑  +  φ ∆  i ∆  ln( 2 )N O  t i − ∑  +
                ∆(CCY)  = ϕ + ϑ (TIME) + ζ (CCY)  + ζ ∆ (CCY) +….               i= 0             i= 0
                       t
                                                           t-1
                                                   1
                                              t-1
                +ζ ∆ (CCY) t-p-1  + ε t                       (1)              x  φ  ln(DAML ) t i − ∑  +  y  φ ∆  ∆  ln(FAR ) t i − ∑  +
                  p-1
                ∆ (PAT)  = ϕ + ϑ (TIME) + ζ (PAT)  + ζ ∆ (PAT) +….             i= 0  i            i= 0  i
                                                    1
                                                           t-1
                       t
                                               t-1
                +ζ ∆ (PAT)    + ε                             (II)            δ  1 ln(PAT +  ) t  δ  2 ln(TEMP +  ) t  δ  3 ln(AGRI) t
                  p-1
                           t-p-1
                                 t
                                                                              +  δ  4  ln(CH 4) +  t  δ  5  ln( 2 ) +  N O  t  δ  6  ln(DAML ) t
                ∆ (TEMP)  = ϕ + ϑ (TIME) + ζ (TEMP)  + ζ ∆ (TEMP)             +  δ  ln(FAR +  )  ρ  (ECT )  +  ε
                                                       1
                                                  t-1
                         t
                 +….+ζ ∆ (TEMP)       + ε                    (III)               7       t          t− 1  t
                t-1     p-1       t-p-1  t                                                                       (IX)
                                                                       Where Δ denotes difference operator.
                ∆ (AGRI)  = ϕ + ϑ (TIME) + ζ (AGRI)  + ζ ∆ (AGRI)
                                                       1
                                                  t-1
                        t
                 +….+ζ ∆ (AGRI)      + ε                     (IV)   4. Results and discussion
                t-1     p-1       t-p-1  t
                ∆ (CH )  = ϕ + ϑ (TIME) + ζ (CH )  + ζ ∆ (CH ) +….   Table 2 shows the descriptive statistics of the variables.
                                                          4 t-1
                     4 t
                                                   1
                                             4 t-1
                +ζ ∆ (CH )    + ε t                           (V)   Crop yield represents the production  of cereal  crops
                  p-1
                          4 t-p-1
                                                                    per unit of land. In our dataset, the average yield for
                ∆ (N O)  = ϕ + ϑ (TIME) + ζ (N O)  + ζ ∆ (N O) +….
                    2
                       t
                                                           t-1
                                                        2
                                                   1
                                            2
                                               t-1
                +ζ ∆ (N O) t-p-1  + ε t                      (VI)   cereal  crops is 1983.552 tons per hectare,  ranging
                                                                    from a maximum of 1429.200 tons to a minimum of
                  p-1
                        2
                ∆ (DAML)  = ϕ + ϑ (TIME) + ζ (DAML)  + ζ ∆ (DAML)   3564.900 tons. The standard deviation of 840 indicates
                         t
                                                       1
                                                  t-1
                 +….+ζ ∆ (DAML)       + ε                   (VII)   variability  in  cereal  crop  production  across  different
                t-1     p-1        t-p-1  t
                                                                    regions and time periods. Skewness and kurtosis values
                ∆ (FAR)  = ϕ + ϑ (TIME) + ζ (FAR)  + ζ ∆ (FAR) t-1 +….   of 1129.717 and 0.592 suggest a positively skewed and
                                               t-1
                                                   1
                       t
                +ζ ∆ (FAR) t-p-1  + ε t                    (VIII)   flat distribution of yield data, respectively.
                  p-1
                Volume 22 Issue 3 (2025)                       110                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025130096
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121