Page 57 - AJWEP-v22i3
P. 57

Phytochemical and functional traits of Suaeda monoica

                  Regarding mineral composition, site S3 surpassed   and temperature can influence photosynthetic pigment
                the other sites in phosphate, sulfate, nitrate, potassium,   biosynthesis. 32,33   Therefore,  higher salinity  at site S3
                magnesium,  and calcium  content  (1.08, 20.3,      may have triggered the accumulation of carotenoids as
                3.85, 0.38, 13.57, and 0.67 meq/L, respectively).   a protective  mechanism against oxidative  stress.  The
                Sodium concentration  was highest at site S1        relatively  lower salinity  at site S1 may have favored
                (13.75 meq/L),  whereas bicarbonate  levels peaked at   Chl  synthesis.  Genetic  differences  among  S. monoica
                site S2 (3.05 meq/L). Interestingly, carbonate anion was   populations at the investigated sites could also contribute
                undetected across all study sites. Overall, soil analysis   to the observed variations,  as genetic  diversity  often
                indicated that site S3 was the most favorable for optimal   underlies differential stress responses in halophytes. 44
                crop growth due to its physical attributes, low salinity,   Previous studies have demonstrated varying Chl
                and abundance of essential nutrients required for plant   responses in halophytes under saline conditions,
                growth and development.                             with some species  showing enhanced  Chl levels  in
                                                                    correlation  with salt concentration, whereas others
                3.2. Photosynthetic pigments in S. monoica leaves   exhibit  no  significant  changes.   The increased Chl
                                                                                                 34
                The impact of the collection site on photosynthetic   content in S. monoica at site S1 in response to salinity
                pigment levels in S. monoica leaves from the study sites is   can  be  attributed  to  enhanced  energy  production
                detailed in Table 3. Statistical analysis revealed that Chl   for stress management,  growth promotion,  osmotic
                a and carotenoids exhibited highly significant increases   stress mitigation, oxidative  damage  protection,  and
                (p<0.01) in response to collection sites, whereas Chl b   overall  performance  optimization  in  high-salinity
                was significantly affected (p<0.05) by site. Leaves from   conditions. 32,33  Moreover, the heightened  carotenoid
                site S1 exhibited the highest Chl a and Chl b contents   levels at the most saline site (S3) suggest that increasing
                (0.60  and  0.37  mg/g  DM, respectively).  In  contrast,   carotenoid  concentrations  may serve as a strategy to
                those from S3 showed the highest carotenoid content   maintain Chl levels rather than diminishing them across
                (0.74 mg/g DM), which was relatively close to that of   varying salinity  levels.   This aligns with the studies
                                                                                         37
                carotenoids of leaves collected from S1 (0.71 mg/g DM).   associating  elevated  carotenoid  levels with increased
                The findings suggest that S1 fostered optimal growth   salt tolerance in some plant species. 35,38
                conditions for S. monoica due to its elevated Chl levels,
                reinforcing  the halophytic  nature of the plant, which   3.3. Osmomodulatory compounds in S. monoica
                thrives in saline environments. The results also support   roots and leaves
                the hypothesis that plants of the same species exhibit   The levels of osmomodulatory  compounds, including
                diverse responses to salinity through quantitative and   SSs, SPs, free amino  acids (FAA), and free proline
                qualitative variations in their adaptive mechanisms. 31  (FP), in S. monoica roots and leaves in response to the
                  The observed differences in photosynthetic pigment   collection sites are delineated in Table 4. Statistically,
                levels between sites could be attributed to environmental   the difference in collection sites had a highly significant
                factors and genetic variability. Environmental conditions   impact (p<0.01) on the levels of all osmoregulatory
                such as salinity, nutrient  availability, light  intensity,   molecules  measured  in  both  the  roots  and  leaves  of

                 Table 3. Photosynthetic pigments in the leaves of Suaeda monoica
                 Site                       Chlorophyll a (mg/g DM)   Chlorophyll b (mg/g DM)   Carotenoids (mg/g DM)
                 Site 1                           0.60±0.01 a               0.37±0.00 a               0.71±0.02 b
                 Site 2                           0.50±0.00 b               0.30±0.00 b               0.61±0.03 c
                 Site 3                           0.41±0.01 c               0.30±0.01 b               0.74±0.02 a
                 Source of variation
                  Fisher’s test                     100.96                     6.017                   57.576
                  Probability                       0.0000                    0.0368                   0.0001
                  Least significant difference       0.033                     0.261                   0.0339
                 Notes:  a,b,c The different letters in the same column represent significant variations at a 5% level. Sites having different letters indicate
                 significant differences in the parameters measured, whereas the same letters indicate no significant differences in the parameters
                 measured.
                 Abbreviation: DM: Dry matter.



                Volume 22 Issue 3 (2025)                        51                                 doi: 10.36922/ajwep.8523
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62