Page 68 - AJWEP-v22i3
P. 68

Almoshadak

                57.  Ramakrishna A,  Ravishankar  GA.  Influence  of  abiotic      doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70793-8
                   stress signals on secondary metabolites in plants. Plant   64.  Sun Z, Yu L, Hu X, Chen B. Effects of enhanced nitrogen
                   Signal Behav. 2011;6(11):1720-1731.                  load on variation and turnover of phosphorus in the plant-
                   doi: 10.4161/psb.6.11.17613                          soil system of Suaeda salsa marsh in the Yellow River
                58.  Miguel MG, Duarte J,  Figueiredo  AC, Barroso JG,   estuary, China. J Soils Sediments. 2023;23:2428-2443.
                   Pedro LG.  Thymus  carnosus  boiss.:  Effect  of      doi: 10.1007/s11368-023-03490-2
                   harvesting  period,  collection  site  and  type  of plant   65.  Hu X, Sun Z. Effects of exogenous nitrogen import on
                   material on essential oil composition. J Essent Oil Res.   variations of nutrient in decomposing litters of Suaeda
                   2005;17:422-426.                                     salsa in coastal marsh of the Yellow River estuary, China.
                   doi: 10.1080/10412905.2005.9698950                   Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28:33165-33180.
                59.  Al-Shawi  AAA,  Hameed MF,  Ali NH,  Hussein KA.      doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12926-6
                   Investigations  of phytoconstituents,  antioxidant  and   66.  Milić D, Luković J, Ninkov J, et al. Heavy metal content
                   anti-liver  cancer activities  of  Saueda monoica Forssk   in  halophytic  plants  from  inland  and  maritime  saline
                   extracted by microwave-assisted extraction. Asian Pac J   areas. Cent Eur J Biol. 2012;7:307-317.
                   Cancer Prev. 2020;21:2349-2355.                      doi: 10.2478/s11535-012-0015-6
                   doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.8.2349               67.  Mujeeb  A,  Aziz  I,  Ahmed  MZ,  Alvi  SK,  Shafiq  S.
                60.  Martelloni  L, Frasconi C, Sportelli  M, Fontanelli  M,   Comparative  assessment of heavy metal  accumulation
                   Raffaelli M, Peruzzi A. Flaming, glyphosate, hot foam   and bio-indication in coastal dune halophytes. Ecotoxicol
                   and nonanoic acid for weed control:  A  comparison.   Environ Saf. 2020;195:e110486.
                   Agronomy. 2020;10:e129.                              doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110486
                   doi: 10.3390/agronomy10010129                    68.  Li B,  Wang J,  Yao L,  et al. Halophyte  Halogeton
                61.  Chandrasekaran M,  Kannathasan K,  Venkatesalu  V.   glomeratus, a promising candidate for phytoremediation
                   Antimicrobial activity of fatty acid methyl esters of some   of heavy metal-contaminated  saline soils.  Plant Soil.
                   members of Chenopodiaceae. Z Naturforsch C J Biosci.   2019;442:323-331.
                   2008;63:331-336.                                     doi: 10.1007/s11104-019-04152-4
                   doi: 10.1515/znc-2008-5-604                      69.  Lutts S, Qin P, Han RM. Salinity influences biosorption of
                62.  Gill  SS,  Tuteja  N. Reactive  oxygen species  and   heavy metals by the roots of the halophyte plant species
                   antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop   Kosteletzkya pentacarpos. Ecol Eng. 2016;95:682-689.
                   plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010;48(12):909-930.     doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.009
                   doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016                70.  Kouhi SMM, Moudi M. Assessment of phytoremediation
                63.  Yezhelyev  MV, Gao X, Xing  Y,  Al-Hajj  A, Nie S,   potential  of native  plant  species  naturally  growing in
                   O’Regan  RM. Emerging  use of nanoparticles  in      a heavy metal-polluted  saline-sodic  soil.  Environ Sci
                   diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Lancet Oncol.   Pollut Res Int. 2020;27:10027-10038.
                   2006;7:657-667.                                      doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07578-6



































                Volume 22 Issue 3 (2025)                        62                                 doi: 10.36922/ajwep.8523
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73