Page 63 - AJWEP-v22i3
P. 63

Phytochemical and functional traits of Suaeda monoica

                by analyzing the nitrogen  and phosphorus content  in   S. monoica growth habitat, roots, and leaves can shed
                its roots and leaves. Phosphorus is required for energy   light on its nutrient utilization efficiency and adaptations
                transmission, cell  division, and root development,   to saline environments, offering valuable insights into
                whereas  nitrogen  influences  protein  synthesis  and   its survival strategies.
                photosynthesis – two of the most important processes in
                plant growth. In S. monoica, nitrogen and phosphorus   3.8. Phytoremediation potential of S. monoica at
                distribution may vary between roots and leaves based   different collection sites
                on their  functions.  Roots typically  contain  higher   The  concentrations of heavy metals  in the  growth
                phosphorus concentrations, as they are vital for energy   habitat,  roots, and  leaves  of  S.  monoica  at  three
                storage and uptake from the soil. Phosphorus in leaves   different sites in Jeddah are detailed in Table 9. A highly
                could  be  lower  but  strategically  located  for  efficient   significant  (p<0.01)  difference  in  the  distribution  of
                energy utilization. Suaeda  species can modify their   heavy metals was observed between the soil, roots, and
                growth rhythm  and adjust  their  capacity  to absorb   leaves  of  S. monoica  at the sites under investigation.
                and utilize  phosphorus to adapt to nitrogen-loaded   Across all  three  sites, the soil samples  exhibited
                environments.  Furthermore,  Suaeda plays a crucial   notably higher metal concentrations, with the order of
                            64
                role  in  the  cycling  of  biogenic  elements,  especially   concentration being Al > Cd > Co > Pb > Ni > Cu > Cr
                phosphorus, by absorbing external nitrogen from both   > Zn. Specifically, soil samples from site S3 displayed
                terrestrial  sources and  the  atmosphere,  impacting  the   higher levels of Al, Cd, Co, Cr, and Ni (28.79, 24.79,
                composition  and activity  of soil microbes. 57,58,65  This   21.83, 0.30, and 2.04 mg/g DM, respectively), whereas
                reflects  the  influence  of  environmental  conditions   site S1 sample showed higher levels of Cu, Pb, and Zn
                and variations in plant nutrient uptake efficiency. The   (0.75, 3.12, and 0.28 mg/g DM, respectively).
                higher nitrogen content in the roots at site S1 could be   The roots of plants at site S1 demonstrated a greater
                caused by elevated  soil nitrogen levels  or enhanced   capacity  to accumulate  higher concentrations  of  Al,
                nitrogen  uptake  efficiency  under  saline  conditions.   Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, and Zn (0.67, 0.45, 0.09, 0.13, 2.15,
                Thus,  analyzing  nitrogen  and  phosphorus content  in   and 5.00 mg/g DM, respectively) compared to roots at


                 Table 9. Accumulation of heavy metals in the soil, root, and leaf samples of Suaeda monoica
                 Sample      Aluminium  Cadmium       Cobalt    Chromium    Copper     Nickel      Lead    Zinc (mg/g
                              (mg/g DM)  (mg/g DM)  (mg/g DM) (mg/g DM)      (mg/g     (mg/g      (mg/g       DM)
                                                                             DM)        DM)        DM)
                 Soil Site 1  15.88±0.02 c  11.57±0.17 c  13.00±1.87 c  0.19±0.07 c  0.75±0.07 a  1.02±0.00 c  3.12±0.00 a  0.28±0.00 b
                 Soil Site 2  17.21±0.02 b  16.54±0.09 b  18.58±2.17 b  0.24±0.00 b  0.05±0.00 g  1.02±0.00 c  1.01±0.00 d  0.04±0.00 e
                 Soil Site 3  28.79±0.03 a  24.79±0.27 a  21.83±1.08 a  0.30±0.01 a  0.06±0.00 f  2.04±0.05 a  1.08±0.11 cd  0.05±0.00 de
                 Root Site 1  0.67±0.01 d  0.45±0.00 e  1.01±0.07 f  0.09±0.00 e  0.13±0.00 c  0.54±0.02 f  2.15±0.01 b  5.00±0.02 a
                 Root Site 2  0.09±0.00 f  0.23±0.05 f  2.48±0.12 d  0.07±0.00 f  0.08±0.00 e  0.57±0.05 ef  1.08±0.02 c  0.10±0.00 d
                 Root Site 3  0.17±0.00 ef  0.37±0.08 e  1.97±0.17 e  0.06±0.00 f  0.09±0.00 d  0.61±0.01 e  0.09±0.01 g  0.05±0.00 de
                 Leaves Site 1  0.35±0.01 e  0.67±0.01 d  1.05±0.08 f  0.09±0.00 e  0.17±0.00 b  0.98±0.12 d  0.72±0.00 e  0.19±0.00 c
                 Leaves Site 2  0.16±0.00 f  0.62±0.00 d  2.47±0.24 d  0.07±0.00 f  0.09±0.00 d  0.42±0.02 g  0.61±0.00 f  0.07±0.00 de
                 Leaves Site 3  0.19±0.00 ef  0.45±0.06 e  1.24±0.05 f  0.12±0.00 d  0.08±0.00 e  1.24±0.83 b  0.08±0.01 g  0.02±0.00 e
                 Source of variation
                  Fisher’s test  32,756.38  65,088.23  7,888.875  785.098  7,054.767  1,424.908  3,763.301  6,743.418
                  Probability   0.0000     0.0000     0.0000      0.0000     0.0000    0.0000     0.0000     0.0000
                  Least         0.1915     0.1163     0.3034      0.0101     0.0084    0.0429     0.0514     0.0644
                  significant
                  difference
                 Notes:  a,b,c,d,e,f The different letters in the same column represent significant variations at a 5% level. Sites having different letters indicate
                 significant differences in the parameters measured, whereas the same letters indicate no significant differences in the parameters
                 measured.
                 Abbreviation: DM: Dry matter.



                Volume 22 Issue 3 (2025)                        57                                 doi: 10.36922/ajwep.8523
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68